Saint Théophile d'Antioche
évêque
d’Antioche au IIe siècle (✝ 181)
Il était évêque de
cette ville sous l'empereur Marc Aurèle. Païen converti, de formation grecque
et de vaste culture, il composa de nombreux ouvrages pour défendre le
christianisme. Un seul, "l'Autolyque", nous est parvenu qui n'est pas
sans nous étonner. Son destinataire supposé est un païen ignorant qui a besoin
d'être instruit. Il pense que les chrétiens mangent des enfants. Alors saint
Théophile n'hésite pas à le traiter de "minus habens".
"Commencez par soigner les yeux de votre âme en changeant de conduite,
alors vous verrez plus clair dans les choses invisibles et votre stupidité,
comme jadis la mienne, en diminuera d'autant."
Originaire d'une famille grecque des rives de l'Euphrate, il reçut une excellente éducation classique. Il se convertit à la lecture des Saintes Écritures. Élu évêque d'Antioche, il gouverna cette métropole de l'Orient en défenseur de la Foi. Nous avons de lui trois livres dédié à un païen, Autolycos. "Si tu me dis: montre-moi ton Dieu, je te répondrai: montre-moi ton âme. Dieu se montre à ceux qui ont les yeux de l'âme grand ouverts."
Commémoraison de saint Théophile, évêque d’Antioche au IIe siècle, homme de très grande érudition, qui fut le sixième après l’Apôtre saint Pierre à tenir le siège de cette Église, et qui composa un ouvrage contre Marcion pour défendre la foi orthodoxe.
Martyrologe romain
Saint Théophile d’Antioche
Évêque d’Antioche
Fête le 13 octobre
† 181
Autres mentions : 10 octobre – 6 décembre
Saint Théophile, évêque d’Antioche en Syrie, du IIe siècle, sous l’empereur
romain Marc Aurèle (161-180), est l’un des Pères de l’Église. On lui doit
notamment une Apologie.
Originaire d’une famille grecque des rives de l’Euphrate, il reçut une
excellente éducation classique. Il se convertit à la lecture des Saintes
Écritures. Élu évêque d’Antioche, il gouverna cette métropole de l’Orient en
défenseur de la Foi. Nous avons de lui trois livres dédié à un païen,
Autolycos. « Si tu me dis : montre-moi ton Dieu, je te répondrai :
montre-moi ton âme. Dieu se montre à ceux qui ont les yeux de l’âme grand
ouverts. »
SOURCE : http://www.martyretsaint.com/theophile-dantioche/
Théophile, ce prénom d'origine grecque signifie
"ami de Dieu".
Prénom magnifique, toujours donné, souvent par "Théo" qui signifie "Dieu". Il y a divers saints Théophile : Théophile d'Alexandrie en Egypte (fêté le 20 décembre), Théophile de Sébaste en Cappadoce (fêté le 10 mars) et celui que l'on appelle "le pénitent" ( 4 février).
Le 13 octobre, on célèbre saint Théophile d'Antioche. Païen, il se convertit au Christ et deviendra évêque d'Antioche (sud-est de la Turquie), sous le règne de l'empereur Marc Aurèle. Il est l'auteur d'une Apologie où il défend avec vigueur le sacrement de l'Eucharistie du Christ : oeuvre qu'il dédie à Autolycos, célèbre écrivain athée de son temps. Il meurt à Antioche vers 190.
Rédacteur: Frère Bernard Pineau, OP
Theophilus of Antioch B (RM)
Died c. 181. Saint Theophilus, a philosopher, was converted to Christianity by reading the Scriptures in an effort to attack them. He became the fifth bishop of Antioch after Saint Peter. Because Theophilus authored of many works of doctrine and apologetics, most of which have been lost, he is known as one of the Apologists of the 2nd century. An introduction his work can be found at the Wheaton College site, which also includes Theophilus to Autolycus (Benedictines, Encyclopedia).
SOURCE : http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/1013.shtml
Theophilus
Bishop of Antioch. Eusebius in his "Chronicle" places the name of Theophilus against that of Pope Soter (169-77), and that of Maximinus, Theophilus's successor, against the name of Eleutherus (177-93). This does not mean that Maximinus succeeded Theophilus in 177, but only that Theophilus and Maximinus flourished respectively in the times of Soter and Eleutherus. Lightfoot and Hort showed that Eusebius, having no such precise chronological data for the bishops of Antioch as he had for those of Rome and Alexandria, placed the names of the Antiochene bishops against those of contemporary Roman bishops (Lightfoot, "St. Ignatius", etc., II, 468 sq., and "St. Clement", etc., I, 224 sqq.). When therefore we find in the third book of Theophilus, "Ad Autolychum", that the writer was alive after the death (180) of Marcus Aurelius, it does not follow, as even writers like Harnack and Bardenhewer suppose, that Eusebius made a chronological blunder.
Sources
source : http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
To Autolycus, Book I
Chapter
1. Autolycus an Idolater and Scorner of Christians.
Chapter
2. That the Eyes of the Soul Must Be Purged Ere God Can Be Seen.
Chapter
3. Nature of God.
Chapter
4. Attributes of God.
Chapter
5. The Invisible God Perceived Through His Works.
Chapter
6. God is Known by His Works.
Chapter
7. We Shall See God When We Put on Immortality.
Chapter
8. Faith Required in All Matters.
Chapter
9. Immoralities of the Gods.
Chapter
10. Absurdities of Idolatry.
Chapter
11. The King to Be Honoured, God to Be Worshipped.
Chapter
12. Meaning of the Name Christian.
Chapter
13. The Resurrection Proved by Examples.
Chapter
14. Theophilus an Example of Conversion.
Source. Translated
by Marcus Dods. From Ante-Nicene Fathers,
Vol. 2. Edited by
Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1885.) Revised and edited for New
Advent by Kevin Knight. <http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02041.htm>.
SOURCE : http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02041.htm
SOURCE : https://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/category/patristics/eastern-fathers/theophilus-of-antioch-eastern-fathers/
Saint Théophile d'Antioche. à Autolyque (bilingue) et Commentaire de la parabole de l'économe infidèle http://remacle.org/bloodwolf/eglise/theophile/table.htm
Theophilus
Bishop of Antioch. Eusebius in his "Chronicle" places the name of Theophilus against that of Pope Soter (169-77), and that of Maximinus, Theophilus's successor, against the name of Eleutherus (177-93). This does not mean that Maximinus succeeded Theophilus in 177, but only that Theophilus and Maximinus flourished respectively in the times of Soter and Eleutherus. Lightfoot and Hort showed that Eusebius, having no such precise chronological data for the bishops of Antioch as he had for those of Rome and Alexandria, placed the names of the Antiochene bishops against those of contemporary Roman bishops (Lightfoot, "St. Ignatius", etc., II, 468 sq., and "St. Clement", etc., I, 224 sqq.). When therefore we find in the third book of Theophilus, "Ad Autolychum", that the writer was alive after the death (180) of Marcus Aurelius, it does not follow, as even writers like Harnack and Bardenhewer suppose, that Eusebius made a chronological blunder.
The "Ad
Autolychum", the only extant writing of Theophilus,
is an apology for Christianity. It consists of three books, really separate
works written at different times, and corresponds exactly to the description
given of it by Eusebius as "three elementary works"
(Church
History IV.24). The author speaks of himself as a
convert from heathenism. He treats of such subjects as the Christian idea of God, the Scripture
accounts of the origin of man
and the world as compared with pagan myths. On several occasions he refers (in
connection with the early chapters
of Genesis) to an historical
work composed by himself. Eusebius (op. cit.) speaks of refutations of Marcion and Hermogenes, and "catechetical
books". To these St. Jerome (Illustrious Men 25) adds commentaries
on Proverbs and the Gospels.
He speaks of the latter in the prologue to his own commentary
on the Gospels, and also in his epistle
"Ad Algasiam", where we learn that Theophilus
commented upon a Diatessaron
or Gospel Harmony
composed by himself ("Theophilus . . . quattuor Evangelistarum
in unum opus compingens"). A long quotation in the same epistle
is all that survives of this commentary,
for Zahn's attempt to identify
it with a Latin commentary
ascribed in some manuscripts to Theophilus
has found no supporters.
BATIFFOL,
Anciennes litteratures chrétiennes: Lit.
grecque. 101-2; ZAHN, Forschung. zur Gesch.
des N.T. Kanons, II; HARNACK, Altchrist.
Lit., 496 sq.; IDEM, Chronologie,
I, 319 sq.; BARDENHEWER-SHAHAN, Patrology
(St. Louis, 1908), 65-7. For Theophilus's teaching concerning the Eternal Word
see NEWMAN, Causes of Rise and Success of
Arianism in Tracts Theol. and Eccles.
(London, 1908), 255- 57. The Ad
Autolychum was first published by FRISIUS (Zurich, 1546); the latest ed. by
OTTO, Corp. apologet., VIII (Jena,
1961). English tr. by FLOWER (London, 1860), and in CLARKE, Ante-Nicene Library. The supposed
Commentary on the Gospels was first printed by DE LA BIGNE, Bibl. SS. Patrum, V (Paris, 1575), then by
OTTO (loc. cit.), then by ZAHN (loc. cit., 29-85). For references to literature
in this commentary see BARDENHEWER; MORIN in Revue Bénédictine, XXII, 12 sq.; and QUENTIN in Revue Bénédictine, XXIV, 107 sq. QUENTIN
gives reasons for regarding John of Jerusalem as possibly the author. For
monographs on Theophilus's doctrine see BARDENHEWER.
Bacchus, Francis Joseph. "Theophilus." The Catholic
Encyclopedia. Vol. 14. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1912. 24 Oct. 2015
<http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm>.
source : http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
To Autolycus, Book I
Chapter
1. Autolycus an Idolater and Scorner of Christians.
A fluent tongue and
an elegant style afford pleasure and such praise as vainglory delights in, to
wretched men who have been corrupted in mind;
the lover of truth does not give heed to ornamented
speeches, but examines the real matter of the speech, what
it is, and what kind it is. Since, then, my friend, you have assailed me with
empty words, boasting of your gods of wood and stone, hammered
and cast, carved and graven, which neither see nor hear, for they are idols, and the works of men's hands; and since, besides,
you call me a Christian, as if this were a damning
name to bear, I, for my part, avow that I am a Christian, and bear this name beloved of God, hoping to be serviceable to
God. For it is not the case, as you suppose, that
the name of God is hard to bear; but possibly you entertain
this opinion of God, because you are yourself yet
unserviceable to Him.
Chapter
2. That the Eyes of the Soul Must Be Purged Ere God Can Be Seen.
But if you say,
Show me yourGod, I would reply,
Show me yourself, and I will show you my God.Show, then, that the eyes of your soul are capable of seeing, and the ears of your heart able to hear; for as those who look with the eyes of the body perceive earthly objects and what concerns this life, and discriminate at the same time between things that differ, whether light or darkness, white or black, deformed or beautiful, well-proportioned and symmetrical or disproportioned and awkward, or monstrous or mutilated; and as in like manner also, by the sense of hearing, we discriminate either sharp, or deep, or sweet sounds; so the same holds good regarding the eyes of the soul and the ears of the heart, that it is by them we are able to behold God. For God is seen by those who are enabled to see Him when they have the eyes of their soul opened: for all have eyes; but in some they are overspread, and do not see the light of the sun. Yet it does not follow, because the blind do not see, that the light of the sun does not shine; but let the blind blame themselves and their own eyes. So also you, O man, have the eyes of your soul overspread by your sins and evil deeds. As a burnished mirror, so ought man to have his soul pure. When there is rust on the mirror, it is not possible that a man's face be seen in the mirror; so also when there is sin in a man, such a man cannot behold God. Do you, therefore, show me yourself, whether you are not an adulterer, or a fornicator, or a thief, or a robber, or a purloiner; whether you do not corrupt boys; whether you are not insolent, or a slanderer, or passionate, or envious, or proud, or supercilious; whether you are not a brawler, or covetous, or disobedient to parents; and whether you do not sell your children; for to those who do these things God is not manifest, unless they have first cleansed themselves from all impurity. All these things, then, involve you in darkness, as when a filmy defluxion on the eyes prevents one from beholding the light of the sun: thus also do iniquities, man, involve you in darkness, so that you cannot see God.
Chapter
3. Nature of God.
You will
say, then, to me,
Do you, who seeGod, explain to me the appearance of God. Hear, O man. The appearance of God is ineffable and indescribable, and cannot be seen by eyes of flesh. For in glory He is incomprehensible, in greatness unfathomable, in height inconceivable, in power incomparable, in wisdom unrivalled, in goodness inimitable, in kindness unutterable. For if I say He is Light, I name but His own work; if I call Him Word, I name but His sovereignty; if I call Him Mind, I speak but of His wisdom; if I say He is Spirit, I speak of His breath; if I call Him Wisdom, I speak of His offspring; if I call Him Strength, I speak of His sway; if I call Him Power, I am mentioning His activity; if Providence, I but mention His goodness; if I call Him Kingdom, I but mention His glory; if I call Him Lord, I mention His being judge; if I call Him Judge, I speak of Him as being just; if I call Him Father, I speak of all things as being from Him; if I call Him Fire, I but mention His anger. You will say, then, to me,
Is Godangry? Yes; He is angry with those who act wickedly, but He is good, and kind, and merciful, to those who love and fear Him; for He is a chastener of the godly, and father of the righteous; but he is a judge and punisher of the impious.
Chapter
4. Attributes of God.
And He is without
beginning, because He is unbegotten; and He is unchangeable, because He is immortal. And he is called God [Θεός]
on account of His having placed [τεθεικέναι] all things on security afforded by
Himself; and on account of [θέειν], for θέειν means running, and moving, and being active, and nourishing, and
foreseeing, and governing, and making all things alive. But he is Lord,
because He rules over the universe; Father, because he is before all things; Fashioner
and Maker, because He is creator and
maker of the universe; the Highest, because of His being
above all; and Almighty, because He Himself rules and
embraces all. For the heights of heaven, and the depths of
the abysses, and the ends of the earth, are in His hand, and there is no place
of His rest. For the heavens are His work, the earth is His creation,
the sea is His handiwork; man is His formation and His image; sun, moon, and
stars are His elements, made for signs, and seasons, and
days, and years, that they may serve and be slaves to man;
and all things God has made out of things that were not into
things that are, in order that through His works His greatness may be known and understood.
Chapter
5. The Invisible God Perceived Through His Works.
For as the soul in man is not seen, being invisible to men, but is perceived through the motion of the body, so God
cannot indeed be seen by human eyes, but is beheld and perceived through His providence and works. For, in like manner, as any person,
when he sees a ship on the sea rigged and in sail, and making for the
harbour, will no doubt infer that there is a pilot in her who is steering her; so we must
perceive that God is the governor [pilot]
of the whole universe, though He be not visible to the
eyes of the flesh, since He is incomprehensible. For if a man cannot look upon
the sun, though it be a very small heavenly body, on
account of its exceeding heat and power, how shall not a mortal man be much
more unable to face the glory of God, which is unutterable? For as the pomegranate,
with the rind containing it, has within it many cells and compartments
which are separated by tissues, and has also many seeds dwelling
in it, so the whole creation is contained by the spirit
of God, and the containing spirit
is along with the creation contained by the hand of God. As, therefore, the seed of the pomegranate, dwelling inside, cannot
see what is outside the rind, itself being within; so
neither can man, who along with the whole creation is
enclosed by the hand of God, behold God. Then again, an earthly king is believed to exist, even though he be not seen by all; for he
is recognised by his laws and ordinances, and authorities,
and forces, and statues; and are you unwilling that God should be recognised by His works and mighty deeds?
Chapter
6. God is Known by His Works.
Consider, O man,
His works—the timely rotation of the seasons, and the changes of
temperature; the regular march of the stars; the well-ordered course of days
and nights, and months, and years; the various beauty of seeds, and plants, and
fruits; and the various species of
quadrupeds, and birds, and reptiles, and fishes, both of the rivers and of the
sea; or consider the instinct implanted in these animals to
beget and rear offspring, not for their own profit, but for the use of man; and
the providence with which God provides nourishment for all flesh, or the subjection in which He
has ordained that all things subserve mankind. Consider, too, the flowing of sweet fountains and never-failing
rivers, and the seasonable supply of dews, and showers, and rains; the manifold
movement of the heavenly bodies, the morning star rising
and heralding the approach of the perfect luminary; and the
constellation of Pleiades, and Orion,
and Arcturus, and the orbit of the other stars that circle
through the heavens, all of which the manifold wisdom of God has
called by names of their own. He is God alone who made
light out of darkness, and brought forth light from His treasures, and formed
the chambers of the south wind, Job 9:9 and the treasure-houses
of the deep, and the bounds of the seas, and the treasuries of snows
and hail-storms, collecting the waters in the storehouses
of the deep, and the darkness in His treasures, and bringing forth the sweet,
and desirable, and pleasant light out of His treasures;
who causes the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth: He makes lightnings for the rain;who sends forth His thunder to terrify, and foretells by the lightning the peal of the thunder, that no soul may faint with the sudden shock; and who so moderates the violence of the lightning as it flashes out of heaven, that it does not consume the earth; for, if the lightning were allowed all its power, it would burn up the earth; and were the thunder allowed all its power, it would overthrow all the works that are therein.
Chapter
7. We Shall See God When We Put on Immortality.
This is my God, the Lord of all, who alone stretched out the heaven,
and established the breadth of the earth under it; who stirs the deep recesses
of the sea, and makes its waves roar; who rules its power, and stills
the tumult of its waves; who founded the earth upon the waters, and gave a spirit
to nourish it; whose breath gives light to the whole, who, if He withdraw His
breath, the whole will utterly fail. By Him you speak, O
man; His breath you breathe yet Him you know not. And this is your condition, because of the blindness of your soul, and the hardness of your heart. But, if you will, you may be healed. Entrust
yourself to the Physician, and He will couch the eyes of
your soul and of your heart. Who is the Physician?
God, who heals and makes alive through His word
and wisdom. God by His own word and wisdom made all things;
for
by His word were the heavens made, and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth.Most excellent is His wisdom. By His wisdom God founded the earth; and by knowledge He prepared the heavens; and by understanding were the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the clouds poured out their dews. If you perceive these things, O man, living chastely, and holily, and righteously, you can see God. But before all let faith and the fear of God have rule in your heart, and then shall you understand these things. When you shall have put off the mortal, and put on incorruption, then shall you see God worthily. For God will raise your flesh immortal with your soul; and then, having become immortal, you shall see the Immortal, if now you believe in Him; and then you shall know that you have spoken unjustly against Him.
Chapter
8. Faith Required in All Matters.
But you do not believe that the dead are raised. When the resurrection
shall take place, then you will believe, whether you will or no; and your faith shall be reckoned for unbelief, unless you believe now. And why do you not believe? Do you not know that faith is the leading principle in all matters? For what husbandman can reap,
unless he first trust his seed to the earth? Or who can cross
the sea, unless he first entrust himself to the boat and the pilot? And what
sick person can be healed, unless first he trust himself to
the care of the physician? And what art or knowledge can any one learn, unless he first apply and entrust himself to the
teacher? If, then, the husbandman trusts the earth, and the sailor the boat,
and the sick the physician, will you not place confidence
in God, even when you hold so many pledges at His
hand? For first He created you out of nothing, and brought
you into existence (for if your father was not, nor your mother,
much more were you yourself at one time not in being), and
formed you out of a small and moist substance, even out of
the least drop, which at one time had itself no being; and God
introduced you into this life. Moreover, you believe that the images made by men are gods, and do great
things; and can you not believe that the God who made you is able also to make
you afterwards?
Chapter
9. Immoralities of the Gods.
And, indeed, the
names of those whom you say you worship, are the names of
dead men. And these, too, who and what kind of men
were they? Is not Saturn found to be a cannibal, destroying
and devouring his own children? And if you name his son Jupiter, hear also his deeds and conduct— first, how he was suckled by a goat on Mount Ida,
and having slain it, according to the myths, and flayed it,
he made himself a coat of the hide. And his other deeds—his incest, and adultery, and lust—will be better recounted by Homer
and the rest of the poets. Why should I further speak of his sons? How Hercules
burnt himself; and about the drunk and raging Bacchus;
and of Apollo fearing and fleeing from Achilles, and
falling in love with Daphne, and being
unaware of the fate of Hyacinthus;
and of Venus wounded, and of Mars, the pest of
mortals; and of the ichor flowing from the so-called gods.
And these, indeed, are the milder kinds of legends; since
the god who is called Osiris is found to have been torn
limb from limb, whose mysteries are celebrated annually, as if he had perished, and were being found,
and sought for limb by limb. For neither is it known whether he perished, nor is it shown whether he is found. And why
should I speak of Atys mutilated, or of Adonis
wandering in the wood, and wounded by a boar while hunting; or of Æsculapius
struck by a thunderbolt; or of the fugitive Serapis chased
from Sinope to Alexandria; or of the Scythian Diana,
herself, too, a fugitive, and a homicide, and a huntress,
and a passionate lover of Endymion? Now, it is not we who
publish these things, but your own writers and poets.
Chapter
10. Absurdities of Idolatry.
Why should I
further recount the multitude of animals worshipped
by the Egyptians, both reptiles, and cattle, and wild
beasts, and birds, and river-fishes; and even wash-pots and
disgraceful noises? But if you cite the Greeks
and the other nations, they worship stones and wood, and
other kinds of material substances,— the images, as we have
just been saying, of dead men. For Phidias
is found in Pisa making for the Eleians the Olympian
Jupiter, and at Athens the Minerva of the Acropolis.
And I will inquire of you, my friend, how many Jupiters exist.
For there is, firstly, Jupiter surnamed Olympian, then
Jupiter Latiaris, and Jupiter Cassius,
and Jupiter Tonans, and Jupiter Propator, and
Jupiter Pannychius, and Jupiter Poliuchus, and Jupiter Capitolinus;
and that Jupiter, the son of Saturn, who is king of the Cretans, has a tomb in
Crete, but the rest, possibly, were not thought worthy of tombs. And if you
speak of the mother of those who are called gods, far be it from me to utter
with my lips her deeds, or the deeds of those by whom she is worshipped (for it is
unlawful for us so much as to name such things), and what vast taxes and revenues
she and her sons furnish to the king. For these are not gods, but idols, as we have already said, the works of men's hands
and unclean demons. And such may all those become who make them and put their trust in
them!
Chapter
11. The King to Be Honoured, God to Be Worshipped.
Wherefore I will
rather honour the king [than your gods], not, indeed, worshipping
him, but praying for him. But God, the living and true God, I worship, knowing that the king is made by Him. You will say, then,
to me,
Why do you not worship the king?Because he is not made to be worshipped, but to be reverenced with lawful honour, for he is not a god, but a man appointed by God, not to be worshipped, but to judge justly. For in a kind of way his government is committed to him by God: as He will not have those called kings whom He has appointed under Himself; for
kingis his title, and it is not lawful for another to use it; so neither is it lawful for any to be worshipped but God only. Wherefore, O man, you are wholly in error. Accordingly, honour the king, be subject to him, and pray for him with loyal mind; for if you do this, you do the will of God. For the law that is of God, says,
My son,fear the Lord and the king, and be not disobedient to them; for suddenly they shall take vengeance on their enemies.
Chapter
12. Meaning of the Name Christian.
And about your
laughing at me and calling me
Christian,you know not what you are saying. First, because that which is anointed is sweet and serviceable, and far from contemptible. For what ship can be serviceable and seaworthy, unless it be first caulked [anointed]? Or what castle or house is beautiful and serviceable when it has not been anointed? And what man, when he enters into this life or into the gymnasium, is not anointed with oil? And what work has either ornament or beauty unless it be anointed and burnished? Then the air and all that is under heaven is in a certain sort anointed by light and spirit; and are you unwilling to be anointed with the oil of God? Wherefore we are called Christians on this account, because we are anointed with the oil of God.
Chapter
13. The Resurrection Proved by Examples.
Then, as to your
denying that the dead are raised— for you say,
Show me even one who has been raised from the dead, that seeing I maybelieve,— first, what great thing is it if you believe when you have seen the thing done? Then, again, you believe that Hercules, who burned himself, lives; and that Æsculapius, who was struck with lightning, was raised; and do you disbelieve the things that are told you by God? But, suppose I should show you a dead man raised and alive, even this you would disbelieve. God indeed exhibits to you many proofs that you may believe Him. For consider, if you please, the dying of seasons, and days, and nights, how these also die and rise again. And what? Is there not a resurrection going on of seeds and fruits, and this, too, for the use of men? A seed of wheat, for example, or of the other grains, when it is cast into the earth, first dies and rots away, then is raised, and becomes a stalk of grain. And the nature of trees and fruit-trees,— is it not that according to the appointment of God they produce their fruits in their seasons out of what has been unseen and invisible? Moreover, sometimes also a sparrow or some of the other birds, when in drinking it has swallowed a seed of apple or fig, or something else, has come to some rocky hillock or tomb, and has left the seed in its droppings, and the seed, which was once swallowed, and has passed though so great a heat, now striking root, a tree has grown up. And all these things does the wisdom of God effect, in order to manifest even by these things, that God is able to effect the general resurrection of all men. And if you would witness a more wonderful sight, which may prove a resurrection not only of earthly but of heavenly bodies, consider the resurrection of the moon, which occurs monthly; how it wanes, dies, and rises again. Hear further, O man, of the work of resurrection going on in yourself, even though you are unaware of it. For perhaps you have sometimes fallen sick, and lost flesh, and strength, and beauty; but when you received again from God mercy and healing, you picked up again in flesh and appearance, and recovered also your strength. And as you do not know where your flesh went away and disappeared to, so neither do you know whence it grew, Or whence it came again. But you will say,
From meats and drinks changed into blood.Quite so; but this, too, is the work of God, who thus operates, and not of any other.
Chapter
14. Theophilus an Example of Conversion.
Therefore, do not
be sceptical, but believe; for I myself also used to disbelieve that this would take place, but
now, having taken these things into consideration, I believe. At the same time, I met with the sacred Scriptures
of the holy prophets, who also by the Spirit of God foretold the things that have already
happened, just as they came to pass, and the things now occurring as they are
now happening, and things future in the order in which they shall be
accomplished. Admitting, therefore, the proof which events happening as predicted afford, I do not disbelieve, but I believe, obedient to God, whom, if you please, do you also submit to, believing
Him, lest if now you continue unbelieving, you be convinced hereafter, when you
are tormented with eternal punishments; which punishments,
when they had been foretold by the prophets, the later-born poets and philosophers stole from the holy Scriptures, to make their doctrines
worthy of credit. Yet these also have spoken beforehand of the punishments that
are to light upon the profane and unbelieving, in order that none be left
without a witness, or be able to say,
We have not heard, neither have weknown. But do you also, if you please, give reverential attention to the prophetic Scriptures, and they will make your way plainer for escaping the eternal punishments, and obtaining the eternal prizes of God. For He who gave the mouth for speech, and formed the ear to hear, and made the eye to see, will examine all things, and will judge righteous judgment, rendering merited awards to each. To those who by patient continuance in well-doing Romans 2:7 seek immortality, He will give life everlasting, joy, peace, rest, and abundance of good things, which neither has eye seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man to conceive. 1 Corinthians 2:9 But to the unbelieving and despisers, who obey not the truth, but are obedient to unrighteousness, when they shall have been filled with adulteries and fornications, and filthiness, and covetousness, and unlawful idolatries, there shall be anger and wrath, tribulation and anguish, Romans 2:8-9 and at the last everlasting fire shall possess such men. Since you said,
Show me yourGod, this is my God, and I counsel you to fear Him and to trust Him.
SOURCE : http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02041.htm
Theophilus of Antioch was a Bishop in the late second
century.
Autolycus appears to be a pagan who is skeptical of Christianity.
Theophilus speaks of him as a friend, though to what extent this is rhetorical
I don’t know (1.1).
Autolycus has challenged Theophilus to show him his god. Theophilus replies, in
essence, that the blind cannot see, but that doesn’t mean that there are not
things to be seen, i.e. Autolycus’ spiritual blindness doesn’t disprove
Theophilus’ deity (1.2).
Theophilus speaks of God as “ineffable and indescribable,” showing how words
about God (e.g., fire, spirit, wisdom) speak to relatable characteristics of
God (1.3).
This is true of even the word “God,” “Father,” “Lord,” and so forth (1.4). God’s
works are how we know him (1.5). Creation
exemplifies this (1.6).
Theophilus invites Autolycus to open himself to this Creator God
(1.7).
Immediately after establishing a “natural theology” of
sorts, Theophilus challenges Autolycus to affirm the doctrine of
resurrection (1.8).
Theophilus’ deity is juxtaposes with pagan gods (1.9) and idols
(1.10).
Since God is God, and the gods and idols are not, Theophilus does not “worship the
King” (Roman) either, but advocates honoring the King as a creation of
the true God (1.11).
The title “Christian” is a pejorative for Autolycus.
Theophilus defends himself as a Christian, saying that “Christian” means
“anointed ones” (1.12).
Likewise, he defends the central Christian doctrine of resurrection by
appealing to nature, ala Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 (1.13).
Theophilus ends Book 1 by appealing to his own testimony of
how he did not believe these things, but after studying Scripture, and by the
Spirit, he has become a Christian. He ends with warning of judgment (1.14).
Book 2 begins with Theophilus recounting a former dialogue.
This book continues the discussion found in Book 1, but also apparently in
person (2.1).
Immediately he engages in the traditional attack on idols: these things were
made by humans (2.2).
Then he questions the nature of pagan deities: if gods beget children, why are
not more gods coming into existence? Why do the gods change locations (2.3)?
Theophilus attacks the various theologies of the philosophers, establishing his
own understanding of the Creator God (2.4). He
quotes writers like Homer and Hesoid to expose the folly of pagan ideas,
especially as it relates to the origins of the cosmos (2.5; 2.6). He
mocks Greek genealogies of the gods (2.7).
Sometimes the ancient philosophers and poets hinted that the truth was known,
but demonic influence forced them to perpetuate the lies (2.8).
On the other hand, the Hebrew prophets were inspired by the Spirit (2.9). These
prophets reveal one Creator God who is above his Creation (2.10).
Theophilus quotes the account of Genesis 1 and defends the mystery of God’s six
days of work as a model for human activity (2.11; 2.12). He
explains some of the oddities of this account, e.g., God beginning with the sky
or light before the sun and moon (the light is the Word of God shining, 2.13). He
interprets the Creation as providing symbolism so we can understand truth,
e.g., islands in the sea are like Churches in the world (2.14). This
is how he goes about explaining vegetation without light. He mixes Creation’s
odd coming-into-being with truisms taught by God in the process, including the
Trinity (yes, he uses the word “Trinity”, 2.15). The
same is done for Day 5 (2.16) and
Day 6 (2.17).
The creation of humanity (Genesis 1.26ff.) presents the dignity of humans (2.18).
Theophilus retells the Genesis story (2.19), the
placements of humans in Paradise (2.20), which
he describes as being a place where humans were put for their advancement (2.24), and
Adam and Eve’s deception, which he describes as “…the account given by holy
Scripture of the history of man and of Paradise (2.21).” When
God “walks” in the Garden, Theophilus explains this as being the Word, the Son,
representing the Father (2.22). He
defends God’s decision to place the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in
the Garden as God providing a means by which Adam could become mature if he
willed it (2.25).
He defends humanity’s expulsion from the Garden by arguing that God will
restore humanity to Paradise through the resurrection (2.26). For
Theophilus the oddities of Genesis can be explained, and it makes sense
literally, and it is true (2.23).
Humanity was not made mortal or immortal according to Theophilus, but with
the potential for either (2.27). He
explains God’s choice to make Eve out of Adam as God foreknowing about
polytheism, therefore he created one human to reflect himself first. Eve is
presented as the one who is deceived by Satan (2.28).
Satan was upset that Adam and Eve were living and having children so he
inspired Cain to kill Abel (2.29). He
gives an account of Cain’s family, and says these truths come from the Spirit
through Moses’ Scriptures (2.30). He
writes about the world after the Great Flood (2.31) and
the impact of Babel (2.32).
Theophilus’ reason for this history being in Scripture and not elsewhere is
that the Spirit has given the truth to Christians (2.33).
The prophets who provides these truths lived holy lives (2.34). He
discusses the precepts they proclaimed (2.35),
argues that the prophecies of Sibyl confirm (2.36), as
do the writings of some poets (2.37),
and philosophers (2.38).
Book 3 is another attempt to convince Autolycus (3.1).
Theophilus begins by rejecting Greek authors (3.2). He
finds that they present a contradictory worldview (3.3). He
denies the rumors spread about Christians: Christians share wives, commit
incest, and eating human flesh (3.4). He
responds that the philosophers teach cannibalism (3.5) and
turning these accusations back on the them (3.6). These
philosophers have differing view on the gods (3.7).
The gods are presented as immoral (3.8). In
contrast, the God of Christians is the Law-giver, who appeared first to
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (3.9). He
explains how the children of Israel went into Egypt before being delivered
through Moses (3.10);
how they were given the Law with warning of exile (3.11); how
the prophets and Gospels uphold this moral vision (3.12),
which include chaste living (3.13), loving
enemies, and being subject to authorities (3.14).
Christians are not guilty of the accusations against them according to
Theophilus, but are obedient to a high moral Law (3.15).
This work is concerned with going on the offense against received Greek
thought (3.16)
and defending Christians as being the ones who hold to the truth (3.17):
Greeks are wrong about the Great Flood (3.18);
Christians are correct (3.19).
Moses is a more ancient thinker and Christian thought goes back to him (3.20).
Contra Manetho Israel was not banished from Egypt, Israel left (the Exodus, 3.21). This
thread of being more ancient is applied to the Temple (3.22),
and the prophets (3.23),
therefore Christianity’s claim to these things goes back further than Greek
thought. Theophilus presents a chronology from Adam to Samuel (3.24) and
Saul to the Exile (3.25) in
order to establish his timeline for his claims that Christianity is more
ancient (8.26).
The book comes to an end with a Roman chronology (3.27), a
summary of the world’s major epochs (3.28), a
reiteration that Christianity is more ancient (3.29), and
an explanation of why the Greeks didn’t know about the events recorded in
Scripture (3.30).
SOURCE : https://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/category/patristics/eastern-fathers/theophilus-of-antioch-eastern-fathers/
Saint Théophile d'Antioche. à Autolyque (bilingue) et Commentaire de la parabole de l'économe infidèle http://remacle.org/bloodwolf/eglise/theophile/table.htm