samedi 13 octobre 2012

Saint ÉDOUARD III le CONFESSEUR, roi

Saint Edouard le Confesseur

Roi d'Angleterre (+ 1066)

Il fut le dernier roi à régner sur l'Angleterre avant la conquête de ce pays par les Normands de Guillaume le Conquérant. Il avait horreur du sang versé. Son peuple le chérissait. Aussi éminent par sa piété que par sa générosité, il sut se faire l'ami des petites gens et fut vite l'objet d'un culte populaire, mais il n'était pas fait pour être roi.

Après bien des querelles pour le pouvoir en Angleterre, la situation n'était pas bien claire. Les Danois avec le roi Canut régnaient sur l'est du pays, la Norvège et le Danemark. Edmond "Côte de Fer" prince d'Angleterre avait été assassiné et sa femme s'était réfugiée en Normandie. Edouard, son demi-frère, revint en Angleterre et y rétablit la couronne par sa sagesse, son humilité et sa compétence. Il cherchait toujours l'entente et la réconciliation là où c'était possible. Les expéditions danoises échouèrent. Le royaume connut une période moins troublée. Il épousa une princesse et vécurent toujours l'un et l'autre dans l'union la plus intime et la plus parfaite. Pourtant les guerres continuaient de se succéder entre Gallois et Anglais, entre les partisans d'Harold et ceux de Malcolm en Ecosse, ce qui n'empêcha pas saint Edouard de légiférer pour son royaume afin d'y établir meilleure justice et plus grande attention aux pauvres. Il résidait à Londres et à Westminster où il fit construire sa cathédrale. Il mourut quelque temps après sa dédicace.

Décédé le 5 janvier 1066, il est aussi fêté le 13 octobre, date à laquelle son corps fut transféré dans le tombeau prévu pour lui (1163).

Voir sur le site (en anglais) de l'abbaye de Westminster.

- vidéo, webTV de la CEF: le pape a offert à la reine Elisabeth en 2014 une reproduction d'un document grâce auquel le culte de Saint Edouard le Confesseur s'est étendu à l'Eglise universelle.

À Londres, en 1066, saint Édouard le Confesseur, roi d'Angleterre, qui fut très aimé de son peuple à cause de sa remarquable charité. Il assura la paix à son royaume et maintint avec soin la communion avec le Siège romain.

Martyrologe romain

SOURCE : https://nominis.cef.fr/contenus/saint/372/Saint-Edouard-le-Confesseur.html

Tapisserie de Bayeux - Scène 1 : le roi Édouard le Confesseur reçoit son beau-frère Harold Godwinson dans son palais de Winchester et lui confie une mission.

Bayeux Tapestry - Scene 1 : King Edward the Confessor, enthroned, and Harold Godwinson at Winchester. Opening scene of the Bayeux Tapestry. Circa 1051, Bayeux Tapestry Museum


Tapisserie de Bayeux - Scène 1 : le roi Édouard le Confesseur reçoit son beau-frère Harold Godwinson dans son palais de Winchester et lui confie une mission.

Bayeux Tapestry - Scene 1 : King Edward the Confessor, enthroned, and Harold Godwinson at Winchester. Opening scene of the Bayeux Tapestry. Circa 1051, Bayeux Tapestry Museum

Reconstruction of the end of the Tapestry by Jan Messent, 1997. In 1997, the embroidery artist Jan Messent completed a suggested reconstruction which depicted William accepting the surrender of English nobles at Berkhamsted in Hertfordshire, and his coronation at Westminster.

Such an ending would balance the beginning of the tapestry where King Edward is shown seated on his throne. It has been suggested that when the tapestry was displayed in Bayeux Cathedral, King Edward and King William would then appear opposite each other. SOURCE : http://anglo-saxon.archeurope.com/bayeux-tapestry-reconstruction-of-the-end/#:~:text=In%201997%2C%20the%20embroidery%20artist,shown%20seated%20on%20his%20throne

Der Teppich von Bayeux


Saint Édouard III

Roi d'Angleterre

(1002-1066)

A la suite de grands troubles qui désolaient l'Angleterre, le prince Édouard passa trente-cinq ans de sa vie en exil. Nous avons peu de détails sur cette période de son histoire. Doué d'un caractère doux, ami de la solitude, il se tenait de longues heures au pied des autels, assistait aux offices divins et aimait beaucoup à s'entretenir avec les religieux. Cependant toute l'Angleterre priait pour obtenir enfin la paix avec un prince légitime. Dieu apparut à un pieux évêque et lui montra, dans une vision, Édouard sacré roi par saint Pierre: "Voilà, lui dit-il, celui qui sera roi par ma faveur; il sera chéri du Ciel, agréable aux hommes, terrible à ses ennemis, aimable à ses sujets, très utile à l'Église de Dieu."

A peine établi sur le trône, Édouard s'appliqua à développer dans son âme toutes les vertus d'un prince vraiment chrétien. Délivré, par l'aide de Dieu, de tous les ennemis du dedans et du dehors, Édouard voulut accomplir le voeu qu'il avait fait d'aller à Rome vénérer le tombeau du Prince des Apôtres; mais il dut céder aux instances de ses sujets, qui avaient besoin de sa présence. Le Pape le délia de son voeu; le roi, en revanche, fit construire une belle église en l'honneur de saint Pierre.

Édouard est célèbre par son désintéressement et par sa charité envers les pauvres. A trois reprises différentes, il vit un des officiers de sa maison mettre la main aux trésors royaux; la troisième fois, il se contenta de lui dire: "Prenez bien garde qu'on ne vous y surprenne!" Le trésorier du palais se plaignant au roi de ces vols, celui-ci, comme s'il n'eût rien su, lui dit: "Pourquoi vous plaindre? Celui qui a pris cet argent en avait sans doute plus besoin que nous."

Édouard avait promis de ne jamais refuser l'aumône demandée au nom de Jean l'Évangéliste; un jour, un pauvre lui ayant tendu la main au nom de cet Apôtre, le roi, dépourvu d'argent, retira de sa main un riche anneau et le lui donna, pour ne pas le faire attendre. Une autre fois, à la demande d'un pauvre infirme tout perclus, il le prit sur ses épaules et le porta à l'église Saint-Pierre, où il fut guéri. Saint Jean l'Évangéliste se montra un jour à deux pèlerins anglais qui se mettaient en voyage pour les Lieux Saints; il leur remit un anneau en leur disant: "Portez cet anneau au roi; c'est lui qui me l'a donné un jour que je lui demandais l'aumône en habit de pèlerin; dites-lui que, dans six mois, je le visiterai et le mènerai avec moi à la suite de l'Agneau sans tache." Édouard mourut, en effet, six mois après.

Abbé L. Jaud, Vie des Saints pour tous les jours de l'année, Tours, Mame, 1950

SOURCE : http://magnificat.ca/cal/fr/saints/saint_edouard_iii.html


LE XIII OCTOBRE. SAINT EDOUARD LE CONFESSEUR, ROI D'ANGLETERRE.

Saluons le lis que porte à son sommet l'antique branche des rois de Westsex ! Les temps ont marché depuis ce sixième siècle où le païen Cerdik et les autres chefs de bandes, venus comme lui de la mer du Nord, jonchaient de ruines le sol de l'île des Saints. Leur mission de colère accomplie, les Anglo-Saxons furent des instruments de grâce pour la terre qu'ils avaient conquise. Baptisés par Rome, comme auparavant les Bretons qu'ils venaient de châtier, ils oublièrent moins qu'eux d'où leur venait le salut ; une éclosion de sainteté nouvelle marqua les complaisances que le ciel prenait derechef en Albion, pour la fidélité dont princes et peuples de l'heptarchie ne cessèrent point d'entourer le Siège de Pierre. L'an 800 du Seigneur, Egbert, descendant de Cerdik, visitait en pèlerin la Ville éternelle, lorsqu'une députation des West-Saxons lui offrit la couronne à ce tombeau du Prince des Apôtres au pied duquel, à l'heure même, Charlemagne restaurait l'empire. Comme Egbert devait ramener sous un sceptre unique la puissance des sept royaumes, ainsi Edouard, son dernier successeur, en résume aujourd'hui les gloires saintes.

Neveu du Martyr du même nom, Edouard s'est vu attribuer devant les hommes et devant Dieu le beau titre de Confesseur. L'Eglise, dans le récit de sa vie, relève avant tout les vertus qui lui méritèrent une appellation si glorieuse ; on ne doit pas négliger toutefois de saluer dans son règne de vingt-quatre ans l'un des plus fortunés que l'Angleterre ait connus. Alfred le Grand n'eut point de plus illustre imitateur. Les Danois, si longtemps maîtres, soumis au dedans pour toujours, au dehors contenus par la hère attitude du prince ; Macbeth, l'usurpateur du trône d'Ecosse, vaincu dans une campagne que Shakespeare a immortalisée ; et ces lois d'Edouard restées jusqu'à nos temps l'une des bases du droit britannique ; et sa munificence pour toutes les nobles entreprises, dans le même temps qu'il trouvait le secret de réduire les charges de son peuple : tout montre assez que le plus suave parfum des vertus qui firent de lui l'intime de Jean le bien-aimé, n'a rien d'incompatible en histoire avec la grandeur des rois.

Voici les lignes que lui consacre l'Eglise.

Edouard , surnommé le Confesseur, était le neveu du saint roi Edouard le Martyr, et il fut le dernier roi des Anglo-Saxons. Le Seigneur avait révélé dans une extase sa future royauté à un saint personnage du nom de Brithuald. Cependant les Danois qui dévastaient l'Angleterre le cherchant pour le faire mourir, il fut dès sa dixième année contraint de s'exiler à la cour du duc de Normandie, son oncle. Telles y parurent, au milieu de toutes les amorces des passions, l'intégrité de sa vie, l'innocence de ses mœurs, qu'il faisait l'admiration générale. On voyait dès lors éclater en lui l'extraordinaire piété qui l'attirait vers Dieu et les choses divines. D'une nature très douce, sans nulle ambition de dominer, on rapporte de lui cette parole : J'aime mieux ne régner jamais, que de recouvrer mon royaume par la violence et l'effusion du sang.

Mais les tyrans qui avaient enlevé la vie et le trône à ses frères étant morts, il fut rappelé dans sa patrie et couronné au milieu des acclamations et de l'allégresse universelle. Tous ses soins se tournèrent à effacer les traces des fureurs de l'ennemi, en commençant par la religion et les églises, réparant les unes, en élevant de nouvelles, les dotant de revenus et de privilèges ; car son premier souci était de voir refleurir le culte de Dieu qui avait grandement souffert. C'est l'affirmation de tous les auteurs que, contraint par les seigneurs de sa cour au mariage, il y garda la virginité avec son épouse, vierge comme lui. Tels étaient son amour et sa foi dans le Christ, qu'il mérita de le voir au saint Sacrifice lui souriant et resplendissant d'un éclat divin. On l'appelait communément le père des orphelins et des malheureux; car sa charité était si grande, qu'on ne le voyait jamais plus heureux que lorsqu'il avait épuisé le trésor royal pour les pauvres.

Il fut illustré du don de prophétie, et reçut des lumières d'en haut touchant l'avenir de son pays ; fait remarquable entre autres : il connut surnaturellement, à l'instant même qu'elle arriva, la mort de Suénon, roi de Danemark, englouti dans les flots comme il s'embarquait pour envahir l'Angleterre. Fervent dévot de saint Jean l'Evangéliste, il avait la coutume de ne jamais refuser ce qu'on lui demandait en son nom; comme donc, un jour, l'Apôtre lui-même, sous l'apparence d'un mendiant en haillons, lui demandait l'aumône, le roi, n'ayant pas d'argent, tira du doigt son anneau et l'offrit au Saint, qui peu après le retourna à Edouard avec l'annonce de sa mort prochaine. Le roi, prescrivant à sa propre intention des prières, mourut en effet très pieusement au jour prédit par l'Evangéliste, à savoir les nones de janvier de l'an du salut mil soixante-six. La gloire des miracles entoura sa tombe, et dans le siècle suivant, Alexandre III l'inscrivit parmi les Saints.

Toutefois le culte de sa mémoire dans l'Église universelle a été, quant à l'Office public, fixé par Innocent XI au présent jour; c'est celui où son corps, levé du tombeau après trente-six ans, fut trouvé sans corruption et répandant une suave odeur.

Vous représentez au Cycle sacré le peuple en qui Grégoire le Grand prévit l'émule des Anges ; tant de saints rois, d'illustres vierges, de grands évoques et de grands moines, qui furent sa gloire, forment aujourd'hui votre cour brillante. Où sont les insensés (1) pour lesquels, avec vous, votre race a semblé mourir ? C'est du ciel que doit se juger l'histoire. Tandis que vous et les vôtres y régirez toujours, jugeant les nations et dominant les peuples (2) ; les dynasties de vos successeurs d'ici-bas, jalousant l'Eglise, appelant de longue date le schisme et l'hérésie, se sont éteintes l'une après l'autre, stérilisées par la colère de Dieu, dans ces vaines renommées dont le livre de vie ne garde nulle trace. Combien meilleurs et plus durables apparaissent, ô Edouard, les fruits de votre virginité sainte ! Apprenez-nous à voir dans le monde présent la préparation d'un autre qui ne doit pas finir, à n'estimer les événements humains qu'en raison de leurs résultats éternels. Des yeux de l'âme, notre culte vous cherche et vous trouve en votre royale abbaye de Westminster; c'est de là que par avance nous aimons à vous contempler montant dans la gloire, au redoutable jour qui verra près de vous tant de fausses grandeurs manifester leur honte et leur néant. Bénissez-nous, prosternés de cœur à ce tombeau dont l'hérésie inquiète prétend vainement écarter la prière. Offrez à Dieu les supplications qui montent de tous les points du monde, à cette heure, pour les brebis errantes que la voix du pasteur rappelle si instamment en nos jours à l'unique bercail (JOHAN. X, 16.).

1. Sap. III, 2. — 2. Ibid.

Dom Guéranger, L'Année liturgique

SOURCE : https://www.bibliotheque-monastique.ch/bibliotheque/bibliotheque/gueranger/anneliturgique/pentecote/pentecote05/047.htm

Saint Édouard le Confesseur. Canterbury Cathedral

Choir screen of Canterbury Cathedral ; Statues of Saint Edward the Confessor in England

Canterbury Cathedral: drie van de zes koningen aan de rechterkant van het doksaal:Eduard de Belijder, Hendrik IV en Hendrik VI.

Canterbury Cathedral: Sculptures of three of the six kings on the right hand side of the choir screen (Pulptium). From left to right, Edward the Confessor, Henry IV, Henry VI

Choir screen of Canterbury Cathedral ; Statues of Saint Edward the Confessor in England


Saint Edouard le Confesseur

Mort le 5 janvier 1066 : le 13 octobre est l’anniversaire de sa translation à l’abbaye de Westminster.

Canonisé en 1161, fête en 1680.

Leçon des Matines (avant 1960)

Quatrième leçon. Édouard surnommé le Confesseur, était petit-fils de S. Édouard, roi et Martyr, et fut le dernier souverain des Anglo-Saxons. Le Seigneur fit voir dans une extase, à un homme de très grande sainteté nommé Brithuald, qu’Édouard serait roi. Il n’avait que dix ans lorsque les Danois, qui alors dévastaient l’Angleterre le cherchant pour le faire mourir, il fut contraint de s’exiler, et se réfugia chez son oncle, le duc de Normandie. Là, au milieu des séductions du vice, il fit paraître une telle intégrité de vie et une si grande innocence de mœurs, qu’il fut un sujet d’admiration pour tous. On vit même alors éclater en lui une piété admirable envers Dieu et pour les choses divines. Il était d’un caractère très doux et sans aucune ambition du pouvoir ; on rapporte de lui cette parole, qu’il aimait mieux se passer de la royauté, s’il ne pouvait l’obtenir sans carnage et effusion de sang.

cinquième leçon. Après la mort des tyrans qui avaient enlevé à ses frères la vie avec la couronne, il fut rappelé dans sa patrie et mis en possession du trône, d’après les vœux et aux applaudissements de tous. Il s’appliqua tout entier à faire disparaître les traces de ressentiments et d’inimitiés. Commençant par les choses saintes et par les églises, dont il réédifia ou restaura les unes, enrichit les autres de revenus et de faveurs, il mit ses plus grands soins à relever et faire refleurir la religion. Poussé par les grands du royaume à se marier, il conserva avec son épouse la virginité dans l’état du mariage : les écrivains sont d’accord pour l’affirmer. Il avait tant de foi et d’amour envers Jésus-Christ que plusieurs fois, pendant la célébration des saints Mystères, il mérita de le voir apparaître, le visage empreint de douceur divine. Partout on l’appelait le père des orphelins et des indigents, et jamais il n’était plus joyeux que lorsqu’il avait épuisé les trésors royaux à soulager les pauvres.

Sixième leçon. Doué du don de prophétie, il prévit surnaturellement plusieurs faits à venir concernant l’état de l’Angleterre, et, chose remarquable entre toutes, il connut par inspiration divine, au moment même où elle arrivait, la mort de Suénon, roi des Danois, qui fut submergé en s’embarquant pour aller faire invasion en Angleterre. Édouard eut pour saint Jean l’Évangéliste un culte particulier, et il avait coutume de ne rien refuser de ce qu’on sollicitait de lui en son nom. Saint Jean, sous les haillons d’un pauvre, lui ayant un jour demandé l’aumône, le roi, dépourvu d’argent, prit l’anneau qu’il portait au doigt et le lui donna ; mais peu de temps après, le saint Apôtre le lui rendit en l’avertissant de sa fin prochaine. Le roi demanda donc aussitôt des prières, et le jour des nones de janvier, jour qu’avait prédit l’Évangéliste, il mourut très saintement, l’an du Seigneur mil soixante-six. Des miracles ayant jeté sur lui de l’éclat, le Pape Alexandre III, au cours du siècle suivant, le mit au nombre des Saints. Innocent XI ordonna d’honorer sa mémoire dans toute l’Église par un Office public, et cela, au jour même où, trente-six ans après sa mort, son corps, dans la translation qu’on en fit, fut trouvé exempt de corruption et exhalant une suave odeur.

SOURCE : http://www.introibo.fr/13-10-St-Edouard-roi-et-confesseur

The Great Seal of Edward the Confessor was furnished with a counter seal, the design being nearly identical with that of the obverse. 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol. 24, pg. 540. Edward the Confessor was one of the last Anglo-Saxon kings of England and is usually regarded as the last king of the House of Wessex, ruling from 1042 to 1066.

Shën Eduard Rrëfimtari, 9 qershor 10421066. Lista e monarkëve anglezë


First Great Seal of Edward the Confessor (obverse), Samuel R. Gardiner (1829 – 1902), A Student's History of England (1915), Longmans, Green & Co., vol. 1, p. 86


Saint Édouard III

Roi d'Angleterre

(1002-1066)

Dans le Martyrologe Romain la date de la mémoire est celle de la naissance au ciel (dies natalis) : le 05 janvier. Localement, le jour de la mémoire  est le 13 octobre, date à laquelle son corps fut transféré dans le tombeau prévu pour lui (1163).

À la suite de grands troubles qui désolaient l'Angleterre, le prince Édouard passa trente-cinq ans de sa vie en exil. Nous avons peu de détails sur cette période de son histoire. Doué d'un caractère doux, ami de la solitude, il se tenait de longues heures au pied des autels, assistait aux offices divins et aimait beaucoup à s'entretenir avec les religieux. Cependant toute l'Angleterre priait pour obtenir enfin la paix avec un prince légitime. Dieu apparut à un pieux évêque et lui montra, dans une vision, Édouard sacré roi par saint Pierre : « Voilà, lui dit-Il, celui qui sera roi par ma faveur ; il sera chéri du Ciel, agréable aux hommes, terrible à ses ennemis, aimable à ses sujets, très utile à l'Église de Dieu. »

À peine établi sur le trône, Édouard s'appliqua à développer dans son âme toutes les vertus d'un prince vraiment chrétien. Délivré, par l'aide de Dieu, de tous les ennemis du dedans et du dehors, Édouard voulut accomplir le vœu qu'il avait fait d'aller à Rome vénérer le tombeau du prince des apôtres; mais il dut céder aux instances de ses sujets, qui avaient besoin de sa présence. Le pape le délia de son vœu ; le roi, en revanche, fit construire une belle église en l'honneur de saint Pierre.

Édouard est célèbre par son désintéressement et par sa charité envers les pauvres. À trois reprises différentes, il vit un des officiers de sa maison mettre la main aux trésors royaux ; la troisième fois, il se contenta de lui dire : « Prenez bien garde qu'on ne vous y surprenne ! » Le trésorier du palais se plaignant au roi de ces vols, celui-ci, comme s'il n'eût rien su, lui dit : « Pourquoi vous plaindre? Celui qui a pris cet argent en avait sans doute plus besoin que nous. »

Édouard avait promis de ne jamais refuser l'aumône demandée au nom de Jean l'Évangéliste ; un jour, un pauvre lui ayant tendu la main au nom de cet apôtre, le roi, dépourvu d'argent, retira de sa main un riche anneau et le lui donna, pour ne pas le faire attendre. Une autre fois, à la demande d'un pauvre infirme tout perclus, il le prit sur ses épaules et le porta à l'église Saint-Pierre, où il fut guéri. Saint Jean l'Évangéliste se montra un jour à deux pèlerins anglais qui se mettaient en voyage pour les lieux saints ; il leur remit un anneau en leur disant : « Portez cet anneau au roi ; c'est lui qui me l'a donné un jour que je lui demandais l'aumône en habit de pèlerin ; dites-lui que, dans six mois, je le visiterai et le mènerai avec moi à la suite de l'Agneau sans tache. »

Édouard meurt le 5 janvier 1066, en effet, six mois après.

SOURCE : https://levangileauquotidien.org/FR/display-saint/17790d63-8b20-48b7-a169-953cf85e9fbe

Anonimo inglese o francese, Edoardo il confessore, Dittico Wilton, 1395-1399, National Gallery

Saint Édouard le Confesseur. Panneau gauche du Wilton Diptych (c.1395-1399), tempera sur panneau de chêne, 53 x 37, National Gallery, Central London,

Richard II d’Angleterre avec ses saints patrons (Edmund the Martyr, Édouard le Confesseur et Jean Baptiste).

Panneau gauche du Wilton Diptych (c.1395-1399), tempera sur panneau de chêne, 53 x 37, National Gallery, Central London,

The Wilton Diptych (c. 139599), tempera on oak wood, 53 x 37, National Gallery, Central London, is a small portable diptych of two hinged panels, painted on both sides. It is an extremely rare survival of a late Medieval religious panel painting from England. The diptych was painted for King Richard II of England who is depicted kneeling before the Virgin and Child in what is known as a votive portrait. The painting is an outstanding example of the International Gothic style, and the nationality of the unknown artist is probably French or English.


Saint Edouard le Confesseur

Roi d'Angleterre (+ 1066)

Dieu donne souvent les mauvais princes dans sa colère ; mais un bon roi est aussi le présent le plus précieux qu’Il puisse faire à une nation.

" Un roi sage est le soutien du peuple ", dit la Sagesse.

Et l’Ecclésiastique :

" Tel qu’est le juge du peuple, tels sont les ministres ; tel qu’est le prince de la ville, tels sont aussi les habitants. Le roi insensé perdra son peuple ; et les villes se peupleront par la sagesse de ceux qui les gouvernent."

La vérité de ces maximes est confirmée par le bonheur qui accompagna le règne d’Edouard le Confesseur.

Le roi Ethelred II eut d’Elvige, sa première femme, Edmond, surnommé Côte de fer, qui lui succéda. Il épousa depuis Emme, fille de Richard Ier, duc de Normandie ; il en eut deux fils, Alfred et Edouard.

Le règne d’Ethelred fut malheureux parce qu’il fut faible. Les Danois, qui depuis environ soixante ans n’avaient point inquiété la Grande-Bretagne, vinrent l’attaquer de toutes parts, et y commirent d’horribles ravages. Ethelred acheta d’eux une paix honteuse, et ne rougit pas de s’engager à leur payer tous les ans un tribut considérable, qui fut levé par une taxe à laquelle on donna le nom de Danegelt.

Swein, ou Suénon, roi des Danois, fit la conquête de toute l’Angleterre peu de temps après, en 1015. Ce prince mourut la même année, laissant un fils nommé Knut ou Canut (que l’on ne confondra pas avec saint Canut III d’Odensée, roi de Danemark et martyr, petit neveu de ce Canut, dont le père fut Suénon II, et que l’on fête au 19 janvier).

Ethelred, qui s’était retiré en Normandie, revint en Angleterre, lorsqu’il eut été instruit de la mort de Suénon, et il remonta sur le trône ; mais il mourut l’année suivante, laissant encore la Mercie et quelques provinces de ses Etats entre les mains des Danois.

Edmond Côte de fer se présenta pour lui succéder. Malheureusement pour lui, il avait affaire à des ennemis puissants, et il lui fallut livrer plusieurs batailles. Enfin, les choses en vinrent au point que l’on proposa de part et d’autre un traité ; il fut conclu près de Gloucester et l’on arrêta que Canut aurait le royaume de Mercie, de Northumberland (ou Northumbrie) et d’Est-Anglie.

Peu de temps après, Edmond fut indignement assassiné par un Danois qu’il avait comblé de bienfaits. Le Danois Canut profita de cette occasion pour s’emparer de toute l’Angleterre.

Emme s’était retirée en Normandie avec ses deux fils Alfred et Edouard. Canut la demanda en mariage au duc Richard son frère, et elle lui fut accordée ; mais les deux jeunes princes restèrent en Normandie, à la cour de Richard II et de ses successeurs, Richard III, et Guillaume le Conquérant.

Canut régna dix-neuf ans en Angleterre. Il fut magnifique, libéral, brave et zélé pour la religion ; mais l’ambition ternit l’éclat de ses vertus. Il mourut en 1036, et ses États furent partagés entre ses enfants : Suénon eut la Norvège, Harold l’Angleterre, et Hardi-Cajut le Danemark.

Alfred et Edouard vinrent de Normandie à Winchester pour voir Emme leur mère. Godwin, qui commandait dans le West-Sex et qui avait contribué principalement à établir l’autorité d’Harold dans cette partie de l’Angleterre, convint avec le roi d’attirer les deux princes à la cour, dans le dessein de les faire périr secrètement. Emme, se défiant de ce qui se tramait, craignit pour ses enfants ; elle se contenta d’envoyer Alfred et garda Edouard près d’elle.

Godwin alla au devant d’Alfred et se saisit de sa personne : il le fit d’abord enfermé au château de Guilford d’où il fut conduit ensuite Ely. On lui creva les yeux, et on le mit dans un monastère où il mourut peu de jours après.

Edouard retourna promptement en Normandie et Emme se retira chez le comte de Flandres.

Après la mort d’Harold, qui arriva en 1039, Hardi-Canut vint en Angleterre avec quarante vaisseaux et s’y fit reconnaître roi. Le prince Edouard y vint aussi de Normandie, et il fut reçu par le nouveau roi avec les égards qui lui étaient dus.

Il demanda vengeance de la mort de son frère ; mais Godwin l’évita, en faisant serment qu’il n’avait point eu part dans la triste fin d’Alfred.

Hardi-Canut, prince vicieux, mourut subitement en 1041. Suénon, autre fils de Canut, existait encore et régnait en Norvège ; mais les Anglais, las de vivre sous la domination de rois étrangers et qui les traitaient avec indignité, résolurent de rétablir sur le trône leurs princes légitimes. C’était l’unique moyen qu’ils eussent de s’affranchir d’un joug pesant qu’ils portaient avec impatience depuis plus de quarante ans. D’un autre côté, les vertus d’Edouard avaient gagné les ennemis de sa famille, et tout le monde s’accordait à vouloir lui rendre la couronne de ses pères. Léofrick, comte de Mercie, Siward, comte de Northumberland, et Godwin, comte de Kent – qui était en même temps gouverneur du royaume de West-Sex, les trois hommes les plus puissants de la nation, furent les principaux auteurs de la révolution qui fit rentrer l’Angleterre sous la domination de ses véritables maîtres.

Edouard avait été formé à l’école de la vertu, et il en avait fait un bon usage. Il savait apprécier à leur juste valeur les biens de ce monde visible. Jamais il n’avait cherché de consolation ailleurs que dans la vertu et la religion. Élevé dans le palais du duc de Normandie, il avait su se préserver de la corruption des vices qui régnaient à la cour de ce prince ; il s’appliqua même à acquérir les vertus contraires dès son enfance ; il était fidèle aux pratiques que prescrit le christianisme, et il aimait à converser avec les personnes de piété. Toutes ses actions étaient extérieures portaient l’empreinte de la modestie. Il parlait peu, mais ce n’était ni par ignorance, ni par défaut de talent ; tous les historiens s’accordent en effet à dire qu’il était d’une gravité et d’une sagesse au-dessus de son âge. Son amour pour le silence venait donc d’un fond d’humilité et de la crainte de perdre le recueillement ou de tomber dans les fautes qu’entraîne ordinairement la démangeaison de parler. Son caractère était composé de l’heureux assemblage de toutes les vertus chrétiennes et morales. On distinguait cependant en lui une douceur admirable, qui avait sa source dans une humilité profonde et dans une tendre charité qui embrassait tous les hommes. Il était aisé de s’apercevoir qu’il était entièrement port à lui-même : de là cette horreur pour l’ambition et pour tout ce qui pouvait flatter les autres passions.

S’il monta sur le trône de ses ancêtres, c’est qu’il y fut appelé par la volonté de Dieu ; aussi ne se proposa-t-il d’autre but que de faire aimer la religion et de venir au secours d’un peuple malheureux. Il était si éloigné de tout sentiment d’ambition, qu’il déclara refuser la plus puissante monarchie, si, pour l’obtenir, il fallait faire couler le sang d’un seul homme. Les ennemis mêmes de la famille royale se réjouirent de le voir sur le trône. Tous se félicitaient d’avoir un saint pour roi, surtout après tant de malheurs sous le poids desquels la nation avait gémi ; ils espéraient que les maux publics et particuliers allaient être réparés par sa piété, sa justice et sa bienfaisance.

Edouard fut sacré le jour de Pâques de l’année 1042, à l’âge d’environ 40 ans.

Malgré les circonstances critiques dans lesquelles il monta sur le trône, son règne fut l’un des plus heureux qu’on eut jamais vus. Les Danois même établis en Angleterre le craignaient, l’aimaient et le respectaient. Quoiqu’ils se regardassent comme maîtres du pays en vertu d’un prétendu droit de conquête, qu’ils en eussent été maîtres pendant quarante ans, et qu’ils eussent rempli de leurs colonies les royaumes de Northumberland, de Mercie et d’Est-Anglie, on ne les vit cependant s’agiter nulle part, et depuis le temps dont nous parlons, il ne fut plus question d’eux en Angleterre.

Pontan, un de leurs historiens, calomnie les Anglais, lorsqu’il les accuse d’avoir massacré tous les étrangers sous le règne d’Edouard. Une pareille entreprise aurait été aussi dangereuse qu’injuste et barbare ; son exécution aurait sans doute fait plus d’éclat qu’un massacre arrivé sous Ethelred II, dans un temps où les Danois étaient moins puissants et moins nombreux.

Si l’on demande ce que devinrent ceux dont il s’agit, nous répondrons que s’étant mêlés avec les Anglais, ils ne firent plus bientôt qu’un même corps de peuple avec eux, à l’exception de quelques uns d’entre eux qui retournaient de temps en temps dans leur patrie.

Suénon, fils de Canut, qui régnait en Norvège, équipa une flotte pour venir attaquer l’Angleterre. Edouard mit son royaume en état de défense, et envoya en Danemark Gulinde, nièce de Canut, de peur que si elle restait en Angleterre elle ne favorisât secrètement l’invasion projetée.

Sur ces entrefaites, le roi de Danemark, appelé aussi Suénon, fit une irruption dans la Norvège et fit ainsi échouer l’expédition contre les Anglais. Peu de temps après, Suénon fut détrôné par Magnus, fils d’Olaüs le Martyr, que Canut le Grand avait dépouillé de la Norvège.

En 1046, des pirates danois se présentèrent à Sandwich, puis sur les côtes d’Essex ; mais la vigilance des principaux officiers d’Edouard les força de se retirer avant qu’ils eussent pu ravager le pays, et ils n’osèrent plus reparaître par la suite.

Edouard n’entreprit qu’une seule guerre, qui eut pour objet de rétablir Malcolm, roi d’Ecosse, et qui se termina par une victoire glorieuse. Il y eut quelques mouvements à l’intérieur du royaume, mais ils furent apaisés avec autant de promptitude que de facilité. On vit alors ce que peut un roi qui est véritablement le père de ses sujets. Tous ceux qui approchaient de sa personne essayaient de régler leur conduite sur ses exemples. On ne connaissait à sa cour ni l’ambition, ni l’amour des richesses, ni aucune de ces passions qui, malheureusement, sont si communes parmi les courtisans et qui préparent peu à peu la ruine des États. Edouard paraissait uniquement occupé du soin de rendre ses peuples heureux et d’établir une société qui favorisât le salut du plus grand nombre de ses sujets.

Il diminua les impôts et chercha tous les moyens de ne laisser personne en souffrance. Comme il n’avait point de passion à satisfaire, tous ses revenus étaient employés à récompenser ceux qui le servaient fidèlement, à soulager les pauvres, à doter les églises et les monastères. Il fit un grand nombre de fondations dont le but était de faire chanter à perpétuité les louages de Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ ; les divers établissements qu’il fit ne furent jamais à la charge du peuple. Les revenus de son domaine lui suffisaient pour toutes les bonnes œuvres qu’il entreprenait. On ne connaissait point encore les taxes, ou l’on y avait recours qu’en temps de guerre ou de nécessités pressantes. Le saint roi abolit le Danegelt.

Les grands du royaume, s’imaginant que le saint roi avait épuisé ses finances par ses aumônes, levèrent une somme considérable sur leurs vassaux sans l’en prévenir, et la lui apportèrent comme un don que lui faisaient ses peuples pour l’entretien de ses troupes, et pour les autres frais occasionnés par les dépenses publiques.

Saint Edouard, ayant appris ce qui s’était passé, remercia ses sujets de leur bonne volonté et voulut que l’on rendît l’argent à tous ceux qui avaient contribué à former la somme. Toute sa conduite annonçait qu’il était parfaitement maître de lui-même ; il avait une égalité d’âme qui ne se démentait dans aucune circonstance, sa conversation était agréable mais toujours accompagnée d’une majesté qui inspirait le respect. Il aimait, il est vrai, surtout parler à Dieu et des choses spirituelles.

Edouard avait toujours fait une estime particulière de la pureté, et il conserva cette vertu sur le trône par l’amour de la prière, par la fuite des occasions, par la pratique de l’humilité et de la mortification. Il veillait avec soin sur tous ses sens et prenait les précautions les plus sages pour se garantir de la moindre souillure. Cependant on désirait le voir marié, et il ne put résister aux instances que la noblesse et le peuple lui faisaient à cet égard.

Godwin mit tout en œuvre pour que le choix du prince se fixât sur Edithe, sa fille, qui joignait une vertu éminente à toutes les qualités du corps, de du cœur et de l’esprit. Une chose arrêtait le roi : c’est qu’il avait fait vœu de garder une chasteté perpétuelle. Il se recommanda à Dieu, puis il découvrit à celle qu’on lui proposait pour épouse l’engagement qu’il avait contracté. Edithe entra dans ses vues, et ils convinrent l’un et l’autre qu’ils vivraient dans l’état du mariage comme frère et sœur.

C’est par un effet de la calomnie que quelques écrivains ont attribué la résolution de saint Edouard à la haine qu’il aurait portée à Godwin. De tels sentiments sont incompatibles avec la haute vertu dont il faisait profession ; il était d’ailleurs incapable de traiter, avec l’injustice qu’on lui suppose, un princesse accomplie, à laquelle il s’était uni par les liens les plus sacrés.

Godwin était le sujet le plus riche et le plus puissant du royaume. Canut l’avait fait général de son armée, l’avait créé comte de Kent et lui avait fait épouser sa belle-sœur. Il fut ensuite grand trésorier de duc de West-Sex, c’est-à-dire général de toutes les armées au midi de la Mercie. Dévoré par l’ambition, il viola souvent les lois divines et humaines. Swein, le plus jeunes de ses fils, marcha sur ses traces et porta même le libertinage jusqu’aux excès les plus coupables. Edouard le punit par l’exil, mais il lui pardonna dans la suite. Godwin lui-même, s’étant rendu coupables de plusieurs crimes, fut menacé de proscription s’il ne paraissait pas devant le roi alors qu’il était à Gloucester.

Il refusa d’abord et prit la fuite ; mais il revint bientôt avec une armée pour attaquer le roi. Quelques uns de ses amis demandèrent sa grâce, et, quoique Edouard fut vainqueur, il lui pardonna et le rétablit dans son premier état.

Pendant la rébellion de Godwin, on crut nécessaire de renfermer Edithe dans un monastère de peur qu’on ne ses servit de sa dignité pour exciter les vassaux et les amis de son père. Malgré cette précaution, saint Edouard n’en était pas moins attaché à la reine, qui de son côté l’aimait tendrement, et ils vécurent toujours l’un de l’autre dans l’union la plus intime et la plus parfaite.

En 1053, le comte Godwin fut emporté par une mort subite. Harold, son fils, lui succéda dans toutes ses dignités. Il vainquit le roi des Gallois méridionaux, qui faisaient des incursions dans les États de saint Edouard. Quelques années après, ce prince fut fait prisonnier et mis à mort par le roi des Gallois septentrionaux. Celui-ci envoya la tête de son ennemi à Harold, afin qu’il la présenta à Edouard. Le saint roi, naturellement généreux, laissa ces provinces conquises par ses troupes, dans le Pays de Galles, aux deux frères du prince qui venait de périr.

En 1058, saint Edouard perdit le pieux et brave Siward. C’était lui qui, l’année précédente, avait rétabli Malcolm III sur le trône d’Ecosse, dont l’usurpateur Macbeth l’avait dépouillé. Dans cette guerre, Siward donna la plus haute idée de son courage. Quelqu’un lui ayant appris que son fils avait été tué sur le champ de bataille, il demanda s’il était blessé par devant ou par derrière ; et comme on lui assura qu’il était tombé les armes à la main et qu’il était blessé par devant, il se consola en disant qu’il avait toujours souhaiter ce genre de mort pour lui et pour son fils. Sa vertu était d’autant plus solide qu’il était d’un caractère bouillonnant et impétueux. Il fut enterré dans l’église Sainte-Marie de York.

Quelques temps après, Léofrick mourut aussi ? C’était un homme d’une piété éminente et d’une prudence consommée. Les abondantes aumônes qu’il distribua aux pauvres, les églises qu’il bâtit ou répara, le célèbre monastère qu’il fonda à Coventry, furent les monuments publics de son zèle et de sa charité ; mais il joignit encore à ses vertus une humilité profonde. Les privilèges qu’il accorda à la ville de Coventry ont rendu son nom immortel dans le pays. Saint Edouard trouvait autant de secours que de consolation dans les pieux et sages conseils de ce grand homme. Algard, fils de Léofrick, fut fait duc de Mercie ; mais il ne se montra pas digne de son père.

Saint Edouard le Confesseur s’est surtout rendu célèbre par ses lois ? Il adopta ce qu’il y avait d’utile dans celles que l’on suivait alors et fit les changements et les additions qu’il crut nécessaires. Depuis, son code devint commun à toute l’Angleterre sous le nom de Lois d’Edouard le Confesseur, titre par lequel elles sont distinguées de celles que donnèrent les rois normands. Elles font partie du droit britannique, excepté en quelques points qui depuis ont subi des changements. Les peines infligées aux coupables par ces lois ne sont point sévères, elles reconnaissent peu de crimes punissables de mort ; les amendes y sont déterminées d’une manière fixe et ne dépendent point de la volonté des juges. Elles pourvoient à la sûreté publique et assurent à chaque particulier la propriété de ce qu’il possède. On était rarement dans le cas de sévir, parce qu’on veillait à l’observation des lois et que la justice était bien administrée.

L’écrivain Gurdon de commenter :

" La sage administration du pieux roi avait autant et même plus de pouvoir sur le peuple que le texte des lois."

" Edouard le Confesseur, ce grand et sage législateur, régnait dans le cœur de ses sujets. L’amour, l’harmonie, l’intelligence qu’il y avait entre lui et l’assemblée générale de la nation, produisirent un bonheur qui devint la mesure de celui que le peuple désirait les siècles suivants. Les barons anglais et normands en appelaient à la loi et au gouvernement d’Edouard."

On a vu peu de princes qui se soient montrés aussi zélés qu’Edouard pour le bonheur de leurs peuples. Il prenait spécialement les malheureux sous sa protection, faisait observer les lois, et voulait que la justice fut rendue avec autant de d’intégrité que de promptitude. Guillaume le Bâtard, duc de Normandie, fut lui-même le témoin des vertus et de la sagesse de son parent, lorsqu’en 1052 il vint le voir en Angleterre.

Saint Edouard, pendant son exil en Normandie, avait fait vœu d’aller visiter le tombeau de saint Pierre à Rome, si Dieu mettait fin aux malheurs de sa famille. Lorsqu’il se fut solidement établi sur le trône, il prépara de riches offrandes pour l’autel du Prince des Apôtres, et disposa tout pour se mettre en état de passer en Italie. Ayant convoqué ensuite l’assemblée générale de la nation, il y déclara l’engagement qu’il avait contracté, et fit sentir l’obligation où il était de témoigner à Dieu sa reconnaissance. Il proposa ensuite les moyens qui lui paraissaient les plus propres à faire fleurir le commerce et à maintenir la paix ; il finit par mettre ses sujets sous la protection du Ciel. Les principaux de l’assemblée alléguèrent les raisons les plus fortes pour le dissuader de l’exécution de son dessein. Après avoir loué sa piété, ils lui représentèrent avec larmes les dangers auxquels l’État serait exposé ; qu’on aurait à craindre tout à la fois les ennemis du dedans et du dehors ; qu’ils s’imaginaient déjà voir toutes les calamités tomber sur le royaume.

Edouard fut si touché de leurs raisons et de leurs prières, qu’il promit, avant de rien entreprendre, de consulter Léon IX, qui occupait alors la chaire de Pierre. Il envoya à Rome, pour ce sujet, Aëlred, archevêque d’York, Herman, évêque de Winchester, et deux abbés. Le Pape, persuadé que le roi ne pouvait quitter ses États sans exposer son peuple à de grands dangers, le dispensa de l’accomplissement de son vœu ; mais ce fut à condition qu’il distribuerait aux pauvres l’argent qu’il aurait dépensé en venant à Rome, et qu’il bâtirait ou doterait un monastère en l’honneur de saint Pierre.

Sébert, roi des Est-Angles, avait fondé la cathédrale de Saint-Paul de Londres. Quelques auteurs lui ont aussi attribué la fondation d’un monastère en l’honneur de saint Pierre, qui était hors les murs et au couchant de la ville. On dit que ce monastère occupait l’emplacement d’un ancien temple d’Apollon, qu’un tremblement de terre avait renversé : mais le silence de saint Bède le Vénérable fait croire qu’il fut bâti quelques années plus tard par quelque particulier et qu’il était peu de chose dans son origine. On l’appelait Torney. Des Danois l’ayant détruit, le roi Edgard le fit reconstruire. Saint Edouard, après l’avoir réparé, y fit des donations considérables ; il voulut encore qu’il fut honoré d’exemptions et de privilèges ; ce qu’il obtint du pape Nicolas II en 1059. On lui donna le nom de Westminster, à cause de sa situation. Il est devenu fort célèbre depuis par le sacre des rois et par la sépulture des grands hommes du royaume. C’était l’abbaye la plus riche de toute l’Angleterre lorsqu’on y détruisit tous les monastères.

Saint Edouard faisait sa résidence à Winchester, à Windsor et à Londres, mais plus communément à Islip, dans la province d’Oxford, où il était né. Anciennement les seigneurs du royaume demeuraient à la campagne et vivaient parmi leurs vassaux ; ils n’allaient à la cour qu’aux grandes fêtes et dans quelques occasions extraordinaires. La fête de Noël était une des principales où la noblesse se rendait auprès du roi. Saint Edouard la choisit pour la dédicace de la nouvelle église de Westminster, afin que la cérémonie s’en fît avec plus de solennité. Les personnes les plus qualifiées du royaume y assistèrent. Le roi signa l’acte de fondation, et y fit insérer à la fin de terribles imprécations contre ceux qui oseraient violer les privilèges de son monastère.

Plusieurs historiens rapportent divers miracles opérés par saint Edouard. Un lépreux le pria instamment de le porter sur son dos royal dans l’église de Saint-Pierre, disant que ce saint avait promis qu’il guérirait par ce moyen. Ce bon prince se prêta à cette cérémonie rebutante et obtint ainsi la guérison du malade. Par le signe de la croix, il guérit une femme d’une tumeur chancreuse reconnue incurable. Trois aveugles ont recouvré la vue en s’appliquant l’eau dont le prince s’était servi pour se laver les mains. Saint Edouard mérita un jour de voir Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ pendant le saint sacrifice de la messe et de recevoir visiblement sa bénédiction.

Après le Prince des Apôtres, celui des saints auquel saint Edouard avait le plus de dévotion était saint Jean l’Évangéliste, ce parfait modèle de la pureté et de la charité.

Voici à ce sujet une histoire charmante.

Saint Edouard ne refusait jamais l’aumône qu’on lui demandait au nom de saint Jean l’Évangéliste. Un jour, n’ayant rien autre chose, il donne son anneau à un étranger qui le priait au nom de saint Jean. Quelque temps après, deux Anglais qui allaient à Jérusalem visiter le Saint Sépulcre, s’égarèrent un soir et se trouvèrent surpris par la nuit. Comme ils ne savaient plus que devenir, un vénérable vieillard les remit dans leur chemin, les conduisit à la ville, et leur dit qu’il était le disciple bien-aimé de Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ ; qu’il chérissait singulièrement leur prince, Edouard, à cause de sa chasteté, et qu’il les assisterait aussi dans tout leur voyage à sa considération. Ensuite il leur remit entre les mains la bague que ce prince avait donnée au pauvre pèlerin pour l’amour de lui, les assurant que c’était lui-même déguisé en pauvre qui l’avait reçue. Il les chargea de la lui rapporter à leur retour en Angleterre et de dire au saint roi qu’il viendrait le chercher au bout de six mois pour le mener avec lui à l’Agneau sans tâche.

Le roi reçut de ces deux pèlerins sa bague et les promesses de saint Jean en fondant en larmes et en louant Dieu pour une faveur si insigne.

S’étant trouvé mal à la cérémonie de dédicace de l’église de Westminster dont nous avons parlé plus haut, il n’y assista pas moins jusqu’à la fin ; mais fut obligé de se mettre au lit à l’issue de la cérémonie. Il ne pensa plus dès lors qu’à se préparer à la mort par des actes fervents de piété et par la réception des sacrements ? Tous les seigneurs de sa cour témoignaient la douleur la plus vive. Voyant la reine fondre en larmes, saint Edouard lui dit :

" Ne pleurez plus ; je ne mourrai point, mais je vivrai ; j’espère en quittant cette terre de mort entrer dans la terre des vivants pour y jouir du bonheur des saints."

Il la recommanda ensuite à Harold et à d’autres seigneurs, et il leur déclara qu’elle était resté e vierge. Il expira tranquillement le 5 janvier 1066, dans la 64e année de son âge et après un règne de 23 ans.

SOURCE : http://jubilatedeo.centerblog.net/6125273-Saint-Edouard-le-Confesseur?ii=1

Saint-Édouard. Baie 02 de l'église Saint-Ouen de Saint-Ouen-la-Rouërie (35).

Saint-Édouard. Baie 02 de l'église Saint-Ouen de Saint-Ouen-la-Rouërie (35).

Saint-Édouard. Baie 02 de l'église Saint-Ouen de Saint-Ouen-la-Rouërie (35).


Qui est Saint Édouard le Confesseur, honoré chaque 13 octobre ?

Chaque 13 octobre, l’Église catholique célèbre Saint Édouard le Confesseur, une figure majeure du christianisme médiéval et de l’histoire anglaise. Roi pieux, homme de paix et souverain visionnaire, Édouard le Confesseur demeure l’un des rares rois d’Angleterre canonisés. Sa vie, empreinte d’humilité et de dévotion, marque une transition entre l’Angleterre anglo-saxonne et la conquête normande. Mais qui était vraiment Saint Édouard ? Pourquoi le célèbre-t-on chaque 13 octobre ? Et que représente aujourd’hui son héritage spirituel ?

Un roi devenu saint : origines et jeunesse d’Édouard

Les racines d’un futur roi

Édouard naît vers 1003 à Islip, près d’Oxford, dans une Angleterre déchirée entre invasions vikings et luttes internes. Il est le fils du roi Æthelred II le Malavisé et d’Emma de Normandie, une princesse issue de la puissante famille ducale normande. Cette double origine — anglo-saxonne par son père et normande par sa mère — jouera un rôle clé dans l’histoire du royaume.

Dès son enfance, Édouard est témoin du chaos politique : les Danois envahissent l’Angleterre et, en 1013, sa famille est contrainte à l’exil en Normandie. C’est là qu’il grandit, entouré de moines, profondément influencé par la culture religieuse et la piété du monde franc.

Un roi pieux au destin inattendu

Le retour en Angleterre

En 1041, après la mort de son demi-frère Harthacanute, Édouard est rappelé d’exil pour régner sur un royaume divisé. Il est couronné roi d’Angleterre à Winchester en 1043, devenant ainsi Édouard III le Confesseur (à ne pas confondre avec Édouard III de la dynastie Plantagenêt, au XIVᵉ siècle).

Un roi de paix dans un monde de guerre

Contrairement à beaucoup de ses prédécesseurs, Édouard n’est pas un guerrier. Son règne se distingue par une recherche constante de paix et de justice. Il tente d’unifier le royaume, apaise les tensions entre les nobles anglo-saxons et les Normands, et s’efforce de gouverner selon les principes de la foi chrétienne.

Ses contemporains le décrivent comme un homme doux, patient et profondément religieux. On raconte qu’il passait de longues heures en prière et qu’il assistait quotidiennement à la messe. Son règne marque une accalmie après des décennies de violence.

LIRE AUSSI :  Sainte Hedwige de Silésie : la sainte du 16 octobre

Le « Confesseur » : un titre rare et symbolique

Que signifie “confesseur” ?

Dans la tradition chrétienne, le mot “confesseur” ne désigne pas un prêtre qui reçoit les confessions, mais un saint ayant confessé sa foi avec courage et persévérance, sans pour autant avoir subi le martyre.
Ainsi, Édouard est appelé le Confesseur car il a témoigné de sa foi tout au long de sa vie, en l’incarnant dans ses actions, son gouvernement et sa charité, sans mourir pour elle.

Une piété exemplaire

Édouard vivait dans une ascèse personnelle remarquable : il observait la chasteté, priait souvent pour son peuple et se montrait généreux envers les pauvres. On rapporte qu’il aurait guéri des malades en les touchant — un geste devenu plus tard la tradition du “toucher royal” pratiquée par les rois d’Angleterre et de France.

Cette réputation de sainteté, déjà vivante de son vivant, ne fera que croître après sa mort.

Le mariage d’Édouard et la question de sa succession

Un mariage sans héritier

En 1045, Édouard épouse Édith, fille du puissant comte Godwin de Wessex. Ce mariage vise avant tout à renforcer l’unité politique du royaume. Cependant, le couple n’aura pas d’enfant. Certains chroniqueurs affirment qu’Édouard aurait choisi de vivre dans la continence, fidèle à son vœu de chasteté. D’autres estiment simplement que le couple est resté stérile.

Cette absence d’héritier direct sera l’une des causes de la crise de succession qui suivra sa mort et mènera à la célèbre bataille de Hastings (1066).

Westminster : le joyau spirituel d’Édouard

Le rêve d’un roi bâtisseur

Édouard le Confesseur est aussi connu pour avoir fondé et fait reconstruire l’abbaye de Westminster, sur les bords de la Tamise. Ce lieu, qu’il consacre à saint Pierre, devient un symbole spirituel et politique majeur de l’Angleterre.

Achevée peu avant sa mort, l’abbaye de Westminster est consacrée en décembre 1065. Elle servira de nécropole royale et de lieu de couronnement pour presque tous les souverains anglais depuis Guillaume le Conquérant jusqu’à nos jours.

Un héritage architectural et religieux

L’édifice d’Édouard, bien que reconstruit au XIIIᵉ siècle en style gothique, demeure au cœur de la mémoire nationale britannique. Son tombeau, situé derrière le grand autel, est devenu un lieu de pèlerinage dès le Moyen Âge.

LIRE AUSSI :  Qui est Saint Grégoire Ier et pourquoi le fête-t-on le 3 septembre ?

Mort et canonisation du saint roi

La mort d’un roi paisible

Saint Édouard meurt le 5 janvier 1066, peu après la dédicace de son abbaye. Selon la légende, il aurait eu une vision céleste juste avant de rendre son dernier souffle, promettant la paix éternelle à l’Angleterre.

Son décès ouvre une période de bouleversements : Harold Godwinson, son beau-frère, lui succède, mais son trône sera bientôt contesté par Guillaume le Conquérant, duc de Normandie — un lointain parent d’Édouard par sa mère Emma.

Une canonisation exceptionnelle

La canonisation d’Édouard est prononcée en 1161 par le pape Alexandre III, près d’un siècle après sa mort. Il devient ainsi le dernier roi d’Angleterre canonisé. Son culte se répand rapidement, surtout à Westminster, où son tombeau attire des milliers de pèlerins.

Le 13 octobre 1163, sa dépouille est solennellement transférée dans un nouveau reliquaire : cette date devient le jour officiel de sa fête.

Le culte de Saint Édouard à travers les siècles

Un symbole de royauté chrétienne

Pendant des siècles, Saint Édouard incarne l’idéal du roi chrétien : juste, pacifique, proche du peuple et fidèle à Dieu. Son modèle inspire de nombreux souverains européens, y compris en France, où des églises lui sont dédiées.

Il devient le patron de la monarchie anglaise avant que saint Georges ne prenne cette place au XIVᵉ siècle.

Néanmoins, son souvenir reste profondément lié à Westminster : c’est là qu’ont lieu les couronnements, dans la continuité de son œuvre spirituelle.

Un modèle de sainteté royale

La figure de Saint Édouard rappelle que la sainteté n’est pas réservée aux moines ou aux martyrs : elle peut se vivre au cœur du pouvoir. En gouvernant selon la foi, il montre qu’un roi peut être serviteur avant d’être maître.

Saint Édouard aujourd’hui : une mémoire vivante

En Angleterre et dans le monde

De nos jours, Saint Édouard le Confesseur reste un patron secondaire de l’Angleterre. Son effigie figure encore sur des blasons et vitraux. Des paroisses, des écoles et des hôpitaux portent son nom, non seulement au Royaume-Uni, mais aussi au Canada, en Irlande, et dans plusieurs pays du Commonwealth.

LIRE AUSSI :  28 août : qui était vraiment Saint Augustin ?

En France

Bien que peu connu du grand public français, Saint Édouard est célébré chaque 13 octobre dans le calendrier liturgique. Dans certaines paroisses, notamment celles portant son nom, des messes spéciales lui rendent hommage.

Sa fête rappelle le lien historique et spirituel profond entre la France et l’Angleterre : sa mère étant normande, il incarne cette double identité franco-anglaise qui a marqué le Moyen Âge.

Les représentations et symboles de Saint Édouard

Iconographie

Dans l’art chrétien, Édouard est souvent représenté vêtu d’un manteau royal, tenant un anneau ou un sceptre, et portant une couronne.

L’anneau symbolise la charité et la fidélité : selon une légende célèbre, Édouard aurait donné son anneau à un mendiant, qui se révéla être saint Jean l’Évangéliste déguisé.

Ses attributs

Couronne : sa royauté juste et humble.

Anneau : symbole de son amour pour Dieu et pour les pauvres.

Abbaye de Westminster : son œuvre majeure et son sanctuaire éternel.

Que nous enseigne Saint Édouard le Confesseur ?

Un modèle de gouvernance spirituelle

Dans un monde souvent dominé par la recherche du pouvoir, Édouard nous rappelle que la vraie autorité vient du service. Il a exercé son rôle de roi avec humilité, préférant la paix à la conquête, la justice à la richesse.

Un message toujours actuel

En célébrant Saint Édouard, l’Église et les fidèles se souviennent qu’il est possible d’être puissant sans être orgueilleux, riche sans être avide, et roi sans cesser d’être serviteur.

Son exemple invite chacun, quelle que soit sa position, à vivre sa foi au quotidien avec intégrité et compassion.

Conclusion

Saint Édouard le Confesseur, roi d’Angleterre canonisé, demeure une figure inspirante de l’histoire chrétienne. Son règne pacifique, sa dévotion, son sens du devoir et sa charité ont marqué durablement l’âme anglaise.
Chaque 13 octobre, sa fête rappelle que la sainteté peut se manifester dans la simplicité d’un cœur fidèle, même au sommet du pouvoir.

Son héritage, inscrit à jamais dans la pierre de Westminster, continue d’unir foi et histoire, rappelant que gouverner, c’est avant tout servir avec justice et amour.

SOURCE : https://www.hymne-nationale.com/saint-edouard-confesseur/


A painting of St. Edward the Confessor, reigned 1042-1066 as king of England. Gave the throne to William the Conqueror but had the throne stolen by Harold Goodwinson making William invade England and starting Norman rule over England.


Saint Edward the Confessor

Memorial

5 January

13 October (translation of his relics)

Profile

Born a prince, the son of King Ethelred II and Queen Emma; half-brother to King Edmund Ironside and King Hardicanute. When his father was unseated by Danish invasion. Edward and his brother were sent to Denmark to be quietly killed, but the officer in charge took pity on the boys, and sent them to Sweden, and from there they went to the King of Hungary to be raised and educated. Edward’s interests were in things religious. When grown, the brothers moved to Normandy and waited their chance to return to England.

In 1035 Edward and Alfred tried to regain the crown of England, but they were turned back, Alfred was killed, and Edward returned to Normandy. He returned to England again in 1042, and was chosen king by acclamation, ascending the throne on 3 April. Edward gained a reputation as just and worthy of the kingship, and the people of England supported him.

During his reign Edward repulsed invasion, helped restore the King of Scotland to his throne, remitted unjust taxes, and was noted for his generosity to the poor and strangers, and for his piety and love of God. He married to satisfy his people, but he and the queen remained chaste. Reported to have the power to heal by touch. Built churches, including Westminster Abbey.

Born

1003 at Islip, OxfordEngland

Died

5 January 1066 of natural causes

interred at the Abbey of Saint Thomas Becket

body incorrupt

Canonized

1161 by Pope Alexander III

Patronage

difficult marriages

English royal family

kings

separated spouses

SestriereItaly

England (former tradition)

WestminsterEnglandarchdiocese of

Representation

carrying a sick man on his shoulders

curing a leper

elderly king offering a ring or coin to Saint John who is disguised as a beggar

Storefront

hand painted medals

Additional Information

Book of Saints, by Father Lawrence George Lovasik, S.V.D.

Book of Saints, by the Monks of Ramsgate

Catholic Encyclopedia, by G E Phillips

Eileen Taylor: A Saint Who Was A King

Golden Legend

Lives of the Saints, by Father Alban Butler

Lives of the Saints, by Father Francis Xavier Weninger

Lives of the Saints, by Sabine Baring-Gould

Menology of England and Wales

New Catholic Dictionary

New Student’s Reference Work

Our Island Saints, by Amy Steedman

Pictorial Lives of the Saints

Saints of the Day, by Katherine Rabenstein

Short Lives of the Saints, by Eleanor Cecilia Donnelly

True Historical Stories for Catholic Children, by Josephine Portuondo

books

Our Sunday Visitor’s Encyclopedia of Saints

Oxford Dictionary of Saints, by David Hugh Farmer

Saints and Their Attributes, by Helen Roeder

other sites in english

A Clerk of Oxford

BBC: Ancient Royal Tomb Discovered

BBC History

Catholic Culture

Catholic Herald

Catholic Ireland

Catholic News Agency

Catholic Online

Christian Iconography

Cradio

English Monarchs

Find A Grave

Independent Catholic News

Little Pictorial Lives of the Saints

New Liturgical Movement

Philip Kosloski

Professor Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira

Regina Magazine

Saints for Sinner

Salve Maria Regina

uCatholic

Vatican News

Wikipedia

images

Santi e Beati

Wikimedia Commons

video

YouTube PlayList

webseiten auf deutsch

Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon

Wikipedia

sitios en español

Martirologio Romano2001 edición

Santopedia

Wikipedia

sites en français

La fête des prénoms

Wikipedia

fonti in italiano

Santi e Beati

Wikipedia

websites in nederlandse

Heiligen 3s

nettsteder i norsk

Den katolske kirke

MLA Citation

“Saint Edward the Confessor“. CatholicSaints.Info. 28 February 2024. Web. 4 December 2025. <https://catholicsaints.info/saint-edward-the-confessor/>

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/saint-edward-the-confessor/


Book of Saints – Edward the Confessor

Article

EDWARD THE CONFESSOR (Saint) King (October 13) (11th century) The son of Ethelred the Unready, born A.D. 1004, and brought up in exile on account of the Danish occupation of England. He was crowned King of England on the restoration of the Anglo-Saxon line (A.D. 1042). A just ruler and in all things considerate of the interests of his subjects, he yet, by the continuous proofs of affection he gave to the Normans, who had befriended him in his youth, stirred up a feeling against him among the high nobles. Foremost among these was the powerful Earl Godwin, whose daughter, Edith, he had espoused. But the Commoners were for “Good King Edward,” and for centuries idolised his memory. His armies were successful in wars with the Scots and Welsh, while peace was maintained within his own dominions. His remission of the odious tax called the Dane-Gelt, and the wise laws he enacted, endeared him to his people, and his care for the interests of religion was of lasting good to them. He died January 5, A.D. 1060, and his body was enshrined in Westminster Abbey, built or rather restored by him, where it yet remains. His festival is kept by the Church on October 13, the anniversary of the Translation at Westminster of his relics.

MLA Citation

Monks of Ramsgate. “Edward the Confessor”. Book of Saints1921. CatholicSaints.Info. 22 November 2012. Web. 4 December 2025. <http://catholicsaints.info/book-of-saints-edward-the-confessor/>

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/book-of-saints-edward-the-confessor/

Matthew Paris (1200–1259), Harold and Tostig fighting at King Edward's feast, Cambridge University Library, MS Ee.3.59 p. 44, in Haskins Society Journal Volume 2, 1990 p. 245


St. Edward the Confessor

Feastday: October 13

Edward the Confessor was the son of King Ethelred III and his Norman wife, Emma, daughter of Duke Richard I of Normandy. He was born at Islip, England, and sent to Normandy with his mother in the year 1013 when the Danes under Sweyn and his son Canute invaded England. Canute remained in England and the year after Ethelred's death in 1016, married Emma, who had returned to England, and became King of England. Edward remained in Normandy, was brought up a Norman, and in 1042, on the death of his half-brother, Hardicanute, son of Canute and Emma, and largely through the support of the powerful Earl Godwin, he was acclaimed king of England. In 1044, he married Godwin's daughter Edith. His reign was a peaceful one characterized by his good rule and remission of odious taxes, but also by the struggle, partly caused by his natural inclination to favor the Normans, between Godwin and his Saxon supporters and the Norman barons, including Robert of Jumieges, whom Edward had brought with him when he returned to England and whom he named Archbishop of Canterbury in 1051. In the same year, Edward banished Godwin, who took refuge in Flanders but returned the following year with a fleet ready to lead a rebellion. Armed revolt was avoided when the two men met and settled their differences; among them was the Archbishop of Canterbury, which was resolved when Edward replaced Robert with Stigand, and Robert returned to Normandy. Edward's difficulties continued after Godwin's death in 1053 with Godwin's two sons: Harold who had his eye on the throne since Edward was childless, and Tostig, Earl of Northumbria. Tostig was driven from Northumbria by a revolt in 1065 and banished to Europe by Edward, who named Harold his successor. After this Edward became more interested in religious affairs and built St. Peter's Abbey at Westminster, the site of the present Abbey, where he is buried. His piety gained him the surname "the Confessor". He died in London on January 5, and he was canonized in 1161 by Pope Alexander III. His feast day is October 13.

SOURCE : https://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=223

St Edward the Confessor, detail. The statue of the Saint sits over the porch on the south side of the RC church.


Edward the Confessor, King (RM)

Born at Islip (near Oxford) c. 1004; died January 5, 1066; canonized 1161. Edward was the son of Ethelbert the Unready (or Ethelred III), king of the English, and Emma, sister of Duke Richard I of Normandy. After Edward's father was defeated by the Danes under Sweyn and his son Canute, Edward and his mother fled to Normandy in 1013. Canute remained in England and in 1016 married Emma, who had returned to England after Ethelred's death.

Edward spent his life from age ten until 1041 in exile in Normandy, returning to England only when Canute the Great died. The following year he succeeded to the throne with the support of Earl Godwin, when his half-brother Hardicanute died.

His elder brother Alfred, had been brutally murdered by Godwin, Earl of Kent. Nevertheless, for reasons of state, in 1044 Edward married Godwin's daughter Edith, who turned out to be the opposite of her father.

Edward's reign was outwardly peaceful and he was a peace-loving man; but he had to contend with the ambitious and powerful Godwin's opposition and other grave difficulties (rivalry between Norman and Saxon courtiers), and he did so with a determination that hardly supports the common picture of Edward as a tame and ineffectual ruler. His was a good ruler and remitted odious taxes.

His anonymous contemporary biographer gives a convincing portrait of him in his old age that has obscured the evidence concerning his middle life. The chronicler as that though physically tall and strong, Edward was unambitious and somewhat lacking in energy, and it seems that his character and temperament were more suited to the cloister than to the throne.

When Robert, the former abbot of Jumieges whom he had brought with him from Normandy and had promoted to the archbishop of Canterbury in 1051, declared Godwin to be an outlaw, Edward did little to support him. Godwin took refuge in Flanders but returned the following year with a fleet ready to lead a rebellion. Armed revolt was avoided when the two men met and settled their differences; among them was the archbishop Robert returned to France and was replaced by Stigand. After Godwin's death in 1053, his son Tostig, earl of Northumbria, led an unsuccessful revolt and was exiled by Edward to the continent. On the other hand a chronicler speaks of 'the king's just and religious administration' and to the people he was 'good King Edward.'

The belief that Edward was a saint was supported by his general reputation for religious devotion and for generosity to the poor and infirm, by the relation of a number of miracles and, too, by the assertion that he and his wife were so ascetic as always to have lived together as brother and sister. Edward and Edith were certainly childless; but that this was due to life-long voluntary abstinence is unlikely in the circumstances of their marriage and is not supported by adequate evidence.

Frugal in his own life, he was generous to monasteries and churches and gave freely to the poor. In commutation of a vow that he had made to undertake a pilgrimage to Rome he rebuilt the abbey at Westminster, where his relics still rest behind the high altar.

According to legend, as Saint Edward was returning from Mass one day, he gave his ring as an alms to Saint John the Baptist, who appeared to him as a poor pilgrim. Twenty-four years later, two English pilgrims returning from the Holy Land met another pilgrim who introduced himself to them as Saint John. Through them he sent word to King Edward that he thanked him for his alms. Through the pilgrims he promised the king that in six months Edward should be with him forever. The message brought joy to the royal heart.

As predicted, Saint Edward died at Westminster on January 5, 1066. He was succeeded by Harold, the son of Godwin, whose brief reign ended with the Battle of Hastings. "Weep not," said Edward to his queen as he lay on his deathbed, "I shall not die but shall live. Departing from the land of the dying, I hope to see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living" (Appleton, Attwater, Barlow, Encyclopedia, Tabor)

His emblem is a finger ring, which he is sometimes shown handing to a pilgrim (Roeder). King Edward is generally shown in royal robes, holding a sceptre surmounted with a dove (Tabor).

SOURCE : http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/1013.shtml

Saint Édouard le Confesseur, Vitrail de l'église Saint-Hilaire à Cantenay-Épinard (49).

Edward the Confessor on stained-glass windows


St. Edward the Confessor

St. Edward the Confessor was the son of King Ethelred III and his Norman wife, Emma, daughter of Duke Richard I of Normandy. He was born at Islip, England, and sent to Normandy with his mother in the year 1013 when the Danes under Sweyn and his son Canute invaded England. Canute remained in England and the year after Ethelred’s death in 1016, married Emma, who had returned to England, and became King of England. Edward remained in Normandy, was brought up a Norman, and in 1042, on the death of his half-brother, Hardicanute, son of Canute and Emma, and largely through the support of the powerful Earl Godwin, he was acclaimed king of England.

In 1044, he married Godwin’s daughter Edith. His reign was a peaceful one characterized by his good rule and remission of odious taxes, but also by the struggle, partly caused by his natural inclination to favor the Normans, between Godwin and his Saxon supporters and the Norman barons, including Robert of Jumieges, whom Edward had brought with him when he returned to England and whom he named Archbishop of Canterbury in 1051. In the same year, Edward banished Godwin, who took refuge in Flanders but returned the following year with a fleet ready to lead a rebellion.

Armed revolt was avoided when the two men met and settled their differences; among them was the Archbishop of Canterbury, which was resolved when Edward replaced Robert with Stigand, and Robert returned to Normandy. Edward’s difficulties continued after Godwin’s death in 1053 with Godwin’s two sons: Harold who had his eye on the throne since Edward was childless, and Tostig, Earl of Northumbria. Tostig was driven from Northumbria by a revolt in 1065 and banished to Europe by Edward, who named Harold his successor.

After this Edward became more interested in religious affairs and built St. Peter’s Abbey at Westminster, the site of the present Abbey, where he is buried. His piety gained him the surname “the Confessor”. He died in London on January 5, and he was canonized in 1161 by Pope Alexander III. His feast day is October 13.

SOURCE : http://www.ucatholic.com/saints/saint-edward-the-confessor/


Page from a Abbreviatio (abridgement) of Domesday Book, circa 1240. Above King Edward the Confessor and Earl Leofric of Mercia see the face of Christ appear in the Eucharist wafer and below the return of a ring given to a beggar who was John the Baptist in disguise. The National Archives UK @ Flickr Commons


Book of Saints – Saint Edward

Article

January 5

Edward was raised to the throne of England at the age of forty years, twenty-seven of which he had passed in exile. He and his wife, Edith, lived a saintly life.

Edward was generous to the poor. He used to stand at his palace gate, speaking kindly to the poor beggars and the sick who crowded about him.

No matter how busy he was, he would be present at Mass daily. He built and enriched churches. Westminster Abbey was his last work.

One of the noblemen at his palace wrote: “Edward was a man by choice devoted to God, living the life of an angel in ruling his kingdom, and therefore was directed by God. He was so gentle that he would not say an unkind word even to the meanest person.”

Edward died on 5 January 1065. In 1611 he was canonized. His incorrupt body was taken to the shrine of the Abbey by Saint Thomas Becket.

MLA Citation

Father Lawrence George Lovasik, S.V.D.. “Saint Edward”. Book of Saints. CatholicSaints.Info. 8 January 2019. Web. 4 December 2025. <https://catholicsaints.info/book-of-saints-saint-edward/>

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/book-of-saints-saint-edward/

Edward the Confessor, detail of the left light of the second south aisle window of All Saints Church, Danehill, East Sussex. It was made in 1892 by the Kempe studio.

All Saints Church, Danehill ; Stained-glass windows by Charles Eamer Kempe ; Stained-glass windows in East Sussex


Menology of England and Wales – Saint Edward, King, Confessor, 1066

Article

Saint Edward the Confessor, whose memory is still dear and venerated throughout the nation which he ruled, though born in England, was from early childhood brought up in Normandy, but without a mother’s care and affection. All this she reserved for the children of her second husband, King Canute, the Dane, the foreign occupant of the throne of her first husband, the English King, Ethelred. Unexpectedly, and against his will, Edward was called in middle age to assume the crown and the burden of rule, for which his education and previous life had not prepared him. By nature he was endowed with few of the qualities which go to make a great sovereign. He indeed possessed a regal dignity and grace of manner and person, set off by blitheness of temper and true kindliness of heart; he was a model of purity of life and unaffected piety, chaste and mild. His power lay not in strength, but essentially in goodness, and by virtue of this goodness he was enabled without bloodshed to impose peace on warring factions, and keep in check high and unscrupulous ambitions, to secure fidelity at home and respect abroad. In the course of his reign of twenty-four years, the love of him entered into the heart of his people. He became to them the good King Edward, the peaceful King, whose memory was so dear, that to have trifled with his simplicity and sincerity seemed in their eyes little less than a crime. His contemporaries had no doubt that he possessed even in his lifetime the gift of miracles, some of which are recorded by one who knew him well. The Abbey of Westminster, which he refounded, and where his relics still repose, bears testimony alike to Edward’s devotion to Saint Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and to the veneration of the English people, until the change of religion, for the Saint, who was the last of their Kings of the ancient race. He was canonized by Pope Alexander III in the year 1161. The festival of Saint Edward is now observed throughout the Church on the 13th October, the day of his solemn translation.

MLA Citation

Father Richard Stanton. “Saint Edward, King, Confessor, 1066”. Menology of England and Wales1887. CatholicSaints.Info. 15 April 2015. Web. 4 December 2025. <https://catholicsaints.info/menology-of-england-and-wales-saint-edward-king-confessor-1066/>

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/menology-of-england-and-wales-saint-edward-king-confessor-1066/

Pierre de Langtoft, ou Piers Langtoft (mort vers 1307), Sanctus Edwardus (Edward the Confessor), standing with a sceptre and a book. British Library,

Chronicle of England (c.1307-c.1327) - BL Royal MS 20 A II ; Edward the Confessor in miniature


New Catholic Dictionary – Saint Edward the Confessor

Article

(10031066) King of England. He was the son of Ethelred II and Queen Emma and half-brother to Kings Edmund Ironside and Hardicanute. Upon the election of Canute to the throne of England, when Edward was only ten years of age, he went with his brother Alfred and his mother to live at the court of his uncle, the duke of Normandy. There he received a pious education, his chief interests being ecclesiastical. After Canute’s death, 1035, Edward and his brother were persuaded to return to England in order to secure the crown. However, the expedition was not successful, for Canute’s illegitimate son Harold had already seized control. Alfred was killed and Edward was forced to return to Normandy. He returned to England again, 1042, after the death of Hardicanute, and by popular acclaim, ascended the throne. His reign was remarkable only as a period of peace. He was completely under the control of Earl Godwin of Wessex, and in 1045, married Edith, the earl’s daughter, but, having taken a vow of chastity, he did not live with her. His only warlike enterprises were the repulsion of a Welsh invasion and the assistance which he gave to Malcolm III of Scotland against Macbeth. He remitted the burdensome tax, “Danegelt,” made wise and just laws, and rebuilt Westminster Abbey. He was the first English king to “touch for the king’s evil,” curing many of scrofulous taint. His mildness and sanctity made him the idol of the people. Represented curing a leper, and carrying a sick man on his shoulders. Canonized, 1161; buried in Westminster Abbey. Feast, Roman Calendar, 13 October; in England also 5 January.

MLA Citation

“Saint Edward the Confessor”. New Catholic Dictionary. CatholicSaints.Info. 10 August 2017. Web. 4 December 2025. <https://catholicsaints.info/new-catholic-dictionary-saint-edward-the-confessor/>

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/new-catholic-dictionary-saint-edward-the-confessor/

A sculpture of Edward the Confessor on the exterior of the library at Stow-on-the-Wold in Gloucestershire.


St. Edward the Confessor

King of England, born in 1003; died 5 January, 1066. He was the son of Ethelred II and Emma, daughter of Duke Richard of Normandy, being thus half-brother to King Edmund Ironside, Ethelred's son by his first wife, and to King Hardicanute, Emma's son by her second marriage with Canute. When hardly ten years old he was sent with his brother Alfred into Normandy to be brought up at the court of the duke his uncle, the Danes having gained the mastery in England. Thus he spent the best years of his life in exile, the crown having been settled by Canute, with Emma's consent, upon his own offspring by her. Early misfortune thus taught Edward the folly of ambition, and he grew up in innocence, delighting chiefly in assisting at Mass and the church offices, and in association with religious, whilst not disdaining the pleasures of the chase, or recreations suited to his station. Upon Canute's death in 1035 his illegitimate son, Harold, seized the throne, Hardicanute being then in Denmark, and Edward and his brother Alfred were persuaded to make an attempt to gain the crown, which resulted in the cruel death of Alfred who had fallen into Harold's hands, whilst Edward was obliged to return to Normandy. On Hardicanute's sudden death in 1042, Edward was called by acclamation to the throne at the age of about forty, being welcomed even by the Danish settlers owing to his gentle saintly character. His reign was one of almost unbroken peace, the threatened invasion of Canute's son, Sweyn of Norway, being averted by the opportune attack on him by Sweyn of Denmark; and the internal difficulties occasioned by the ambition of Earl Godwin and his sons being settled without bloodshed by Edward's own gentleness and prudence. He undertook no wars except to repel an inroad of the Welsh, and to assist Malcolm III of Scotland against Macbeth, the usurper of his throne. Being devoid of personal ambition, Edward's one aim was the welfare of his people. He remitted the odious "Danegelt", which had needlessly continued to be levied; and though profuse in alms to the poor and for religious purposes, he made his own royal patrimony suffice without imposing taxes. Such was the contentment caused by "the good St. Edward's laws", that their enactment was repeatedly demanded by later generations, when they felt themselves oppressed.

Yielding to the entreaty of his nobles, he accepted as his consort the virtuous Editha, Earl Godwin's daughter. Having, however, made a vow of chastity, he first required her agreement to live with him only as a sister. As he could not leave his kingdom without injury to his people, the making of a pilgrimage to St. Peter's tomb, to which he had bound himself, was commuted by the pope into the rebuilding at Westminster of St. Peter's abbey, the dedication of which took place but a week before his death, and in which he was buried. St. Edward was the first King of England to touch for the "king's evil", many sufferers from the disease were cured by him. He was canonized by Alexander III in 1161. His feast is kept on the 13th of October, his incorrupt body having been solemnly translated on that day in 1163 by St. Thomas of Canterbury in the presence of King Henry II.

Phillips, George. "St. Edward the Confessor." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. 14 Oct. 2015 <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05322a.htm>.

Transcription. This article was transcribed for New Advent by Ann Waterman.

Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. May 1, 1909. Remy Lafort, Censor. Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.

Copyright © 2020 by Kevin Knight. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

SOURCE : http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05322a.htm

Shrine of Edward the Confessor. Edward the Confessor Chapel Westminster Abbey London England

Shrine of Edward the Confessor. Edward the Confessor Chapel Westminster Abbey London England


October 13

St. Edward, King and Confessor

From William of Malmesbury, (de Reg. Angl. 2, c. 13,) whom Sir H. Saville calls the best historian of our nation, and who wrote in 1140; Matthew of Westminster, or whoever compiled the Flores Hist. Angl. from Matthew Paris, &c.; the life of St. Edward, C. written by St. Aëlred, abbot of Rieval, who died in 1166, of which work the most complete and accurate edition is that of Roger Twysden, (inter 10 Angl. Scriptores, Londini, an. 1652, t. 1, p. 370.) An accurate account of his death is given by Sulcard, a monk of Westminster, in the reign of the Conqueror, who wrote, by order of his abbot, Vitalis, a short history, (De Constructione Westmonasterii,) of which two beautiful MS. copies were lent me from the Cotton Library, and the archives of Westminster. See also Ingulphus, published by Gale, Brompton by Twysden, Knyghton, ibid. Hoveden and Matt. Paris, ad an. 1066. Harpsfield, Sæc. xi. c. 3. Likewise the historians of Normandy, Odericus Vitalis in Hist. Normann. Gulielmus Pictav. de Gestis Gul. Ducis, &c. The Letter of Innocent II. on the Canoniz. of St. Edw. an. 1138, ap. Wilk. Conc. Br. t. 1, p. 419; the bull of Alexander III. ibid. p. 434; that of Greg. IX. in 1227; and Rymer’s Fœdera, t. 1, p. 297.

A.D. 1066.

GOD often gives bad princes in his wrath; but in a good king he bestoweth a great public blessing on a nation. A wise king is the upholding of his people. 1 As the judge of the people is himself, so are his officers: and what manner of man the ruler of the city is, such also are they that dwell therein. An unwise king destroyeth his people; but through the prudence of them that are in authority, the city shall be inhabited. 2 The happiness of the reign of St. Edward the Confessor is itself a panegyric of his virtue. This prince was son of King Ethelred II. who left by Elgiva, his first wife, Edmund Ironside, who was his successor; and, by his second wife, Emma, daughter to Richard I. and sister to Richard II. the third and fourth Dukes of Normandy, he had Alfred and Edward. In his unhappy and weak reign, the Danes, who from the time of King Athelstan had, for about sixty years, left this island unmolested, committed in all parts of it most horrible ravages. To redeem the country from these vexations, Ethelred engaged to pay them a tax, called Danegelt, of forty thousand pounds a-year, which was raised at the rate of twelve pence upon each hide of land, or as much as could be tilled with one plough in a year. Swein or Sweno, King of the Danes, conquered all England soon after, in 1015; but died the same year, leaving here his son Knute or Canute. Ethelred, who had fled into Normandy, returned upon his death and recovered his kingdom; but, dying in 1016, left Mercia and some other parts in the hands of the Danes. Edmund Ironside, after several battles, came to an agreement, which was concluded in the isle Alney, in the Severn, near Gloucester, by which he consented to divide the kingdom with Canute, yielding up to him the kingdoms of Mercia, Northumberland, and the East-Angles. Shortly after, he was treacherously assassinated by the contrivance of Edric Strean, a Dane, Count of Mercia, on whom he had bestowed the greatest favours, and by whom he had been before often betrayed.

Canute took this opportunity to seize the whole kingdom, and ordered the late king’s two infant sons, Edmund and Edward, to be conveyed into Denmark, there to be privately made away with. The officer who conducted them was moved to compassion, and carried them into Sweden, where the king sent them to his cousin Solomon, king of Hungary. When they were grown up, Solomon gave in marriage to Edmund one of his own daughters, and to Edward his sister-in-law Agatha. Emma was retired with her two sons, Alfred and Edward, into Normandy. Canute demanded her of her brother, Duke Richard, in marriage, and his request was agreed to. But the two princes remained in Normandy, where Richard II. was succeeded, 1026, by his son Richard III. He reigned only one year, and by his death his brother Robert became duke of Normandy, who, at his death left no other issue than a bastard, known afterwards by the name of William the Conqueror. Canute reigned in England nineteen years, and was magnificent, liberal, valiant, and religious, though no virtues could excuse his ambition. Dying in 1036, he left Norway to his eldest son, Sweno, England to his son Harold, and Denmark to his son Hardicanute, whom he had by Emma. The two Saxon princes, Alfred and Edward, came over from Normandy to see their mother at Winchester. Godwin, duke or general of West-Sex, who had been the chief instrument in establishing Harold’s interest in that part of England, agreed with the king that the two princes should be invited to court, in order to be secretly made away with. Emma was startled at this message, which was sent to them at Winchester, and was apprehensive of a snare; she therefore contrived to send only Alfred, and, upon some pretences, to keep Edward with her. Godwin met Alfred at Guilford, where the young prince was seized, put first into the castle, and thence conducted to Ely, where his eyes were pulled out: he was shut up in a monastery, and died a few days after. Edward made haste back into Normandy, and Emma retired to the Count of Flanders, and lived at Bruges. King Harold dying in winter, 1039, her son Hardicanute landed in England with forty Danish ships, and was acknowledged king. Prince Edward came from Normandy, and was received by him with honour. At his request Count Godwin was brought to his trial for the murder of Prince Alfred; but was acquitted upon his making oath that he was not privy to his death. Hardicanute, an unworthy prince, died suddenly at the marriage entertainment of a certain Dane at Lambeth, in the third year of his reign, 1041. Sweno, another son of Canutus, was still living, and king of Norway; but the oppressions which the English had groaned under for many years, inspired them with a vigorous resolution of restoring the crown to their own princes. The calamities of the most furious war, and the want of power to make any   resistance, had obliged them to bear the Danish yoke forty-four years. But they were harassed beyond expression under three or rather four Danish kings (including Sweno) with continual cruel exactions; and so great was the tyranny of these masters, that if any Englishman met any Dane upon a bridge, he durst not go over it till the Dane had passed first; and whoever did not respectfully salute a Dane on the road, was severely punished on the spot. On the other side, the virtues of Prince Edward silenced even the enemies of his family, and the voice of the whole kingdom was unanimous in demanding that he should be placed upon the throne of his ancestors. Leofric, earl of Mercia, Siward, earl of Northumberland, and Godwin, earl of Kent and governor of the whole kingdom of West-Sex, were the leading men in this resolution, and were the most powerful persons in the nation. 3

St. Edward was nursed in the wholesome school of adversity, the mistress of all virtues to those who make a right use of it. The heart of the young prince seemed almost naturally weaned from the world by an early feeling experience of its falsehood, deceitfulness, and miseries. This also led him to seek comfort in the only true channel; which is virtue and the divine love. Though educated in the palace of the Duke of Normandy, he was always an enemy to vanity, pleasure, and pride; so diligently did he fortify his mind against the contagion of a court in which these vices reigned. The arms by which he triumphed over them were, at the same time, the means by which he grounded his heart in the rooted habits of the contrary virtues. From his infancy it was his delight to pray much, to assist as often as possible at the divine sacrifice of the altar, to visit churches and monasteries, and converse with the most holy and perfect among the servants of God. He was modest in his comportment, and sparing in his words; not out of ignorance or slowness of parts, for all historians assure us, that in wisdom and gravity he much surpassed his years; but out of sincere humility, love of recollection, and just apprehension of the snares and dangers of too great forwardness and volubility of speech. His character from his youth was the aggregate of all Christian and moral virtues; but that which particularly distinguished him was an incomparable mildness and   sweetness of temper; the fruit of the most sincere humility, and tender universal charity. By this test of genuine virtue, and mark of the spirit of our divine Redeemer, it manifestly appeared how perfectly the saint was dead to himself. Ambition could find no place in a heart crucified to the world, and to all the false interests of the passions. He had learned in the school of Christ how empty, how false all worldly honours are, how heavy their burden is, and how grievous the charge that attends them. If, where a person has no other aim in them but what is directed to the honour of God, and the utility of others, they may be lawful and holy; it is a certain principle in morality that it is a most fatal and criminal passion for a person to rest in them, or to love them for themselves, or to seek or please himself in them. A man must be grounded in perfect humility, and has need of an extraordinary strength and grace to bear the weight of honour, and not suffer his heart to cleave to it. The height of dignity exposes souls to great dangers, as the highest trees are assailed by the greatest storms. So that a much greater virtue is required to command than to obey; and a Christian ought to learn from the example which Christ has set us, that it is often the safest way to endeavour to fly such posts; and that no one ought to receive a place of honour, without being well assured that it is the will of God that calls him to it, and without being resolved to live upon that pinnacle always in fear and trembling, by having constantly the weight of his obligations, and the fear of the divine judgments before his eyes. Those who open a door to any secret ambition in their hearts, are justly abandoned by God, who says of them: The kings have reigned, but not by me: they have been princes, and I knew it not. 4 St. Edward was called to the crown by the right door, and placed by God on the throne of his ancestors, and had no views but to the advancement of the divine honour, and to the comfort and relief of a distressed people. So far was he from the least spark of ambition, that he declared he would by no means accept the greatest monarchy, if it were to cost the blood of a single man. The very enemies of the royal family rejoiced to see Edward seated on the throne. All were most desirous, after so much tyranny, wars, and bloodshed, to have a saint for king, in whom piety, justice, universal benevolence, and goodness would reign, and direct all public councils. With the incredible joy of the whole kingdom he was anointed and crowned on Easter day in 1042, being about forty years old.

Though he ascended the throne in the most difficult times of distraction and commotions, both foreign and domestic, and by his piety and simplicity might seem fitter for a cloister than such a crown, yet never was any reign more happy. The very Danes that were settled in England, loved, respected, and feared his name; and to him it was owing, that though they had looked upon England as their own by a pretended right of conquest, and though they were so numerous as to be able to hold the whole nation in the most barbarous subjection for forty years past, and filled the kingdoms of Northumberland, Mercia, and the East-Angles with their colonies, yet they made not the least opposition or disturbance, and from that time were never more mentioned in England. It is certain, from the silence of all our historians, that no massacre was made of them by the English in the reign of St. Edward, as Pontanus, the Danish historian pretends. Such an attempt could not but have been as dangerous as it would have been barbarous and unjust, and must have made a much greater noise than that which happened under Ethelred II. when their power and numbers were much less. Nor is it to be doubted but, mingling with the English, they became incorporated with them; except some who might, from time to time, return into their own country. Sweno, king of Norway, son of Canute the Great, equipped a fleet to invade England. Edward put his kingdom in a good posture to repulse him, and sent Gulinda, a niece of Canute’s, into Denmark, lest, by staying in England, she might favour the invasion. In the mean time another Sweno, king of Denmark, made an irruption into Norway, which obliged the Norwegian to lay aside his expedition against England; and he was soon after dethroned by Magnus, the son of Olaus the Martyr, whom Canute the Great had stripped of Norway. In 1046, certain Danish pirates, in twenty-five vessels, landed first at Sandwich, then on the coasts of Essex; but the vigilance of Godwin, Leofric, and Siward obliged them to leave this island in peace; nor did they ever return again. This happened a little above two hundred years after their first invasion, in the reign of Egbert, about the year 830. 5

The only war the saint ever undertook was to restore Malcolm, king of Scotland, to which a glorious victory immediately put an end; and we have seen that the only attempt which was ever formed against him by the Danes failed of itself. At home Earl Godwin, and some other ambitious spirits, complained he kept several Normans, whom he had brought over with him, about his person. But the holy king with great prudence brought them to reason, or obliged them to leave his dominions for a time, without bloodshed; so that the little clouds which began to gather in his time, were immediately scattered without embroiling the state. A sensible proof how formidable the affection of a whole people renders a prince, and how great a happiness it is to a nation when a king who is truly the father of his subjects, reigns in their hearts. The example of St. Edward’s virtues had a powerful influence over many that were about his person in teaching them to curb their passions. It is frequently the ambition of sovereigns which awakens that of their subjects; and a love of riches sharpens a violent love of vanity and luxury, and produces pride, which passions break forth in various vices, which weaken, undermine, and destroy a state. No prince ever gave stronger or more constant proofs than St. Edward of a heart entirely free from that canker. He seemed to have no other desire than to see his people happy, and to ease their burdens; and no prince seems ever to have surpassed him in his compassion for the necessities of others. Having no inordinate passions to feed, he knew no other use of money than to answer the obligations of justice, to recompense the services of those that deserved well of the state, and to extend his liberality to monasteries and churches, and, above all, to the poor. He delighted much in religious foundations, by which the divine service and praises might be perpetuated on earth to the end of time; but he would never think of plundering his people to raise these public structures, or to satisfy his profuse alms. His own royal patrimony sufficed for all. At that time kings had their estates; taxes were not raised except in time of war or on other extraordinary emergencies. 6 St. Edward never found himself under any necessity of having recourse to such burdensome methods. He remitted the Danegelt, which in his father’s time had been paid to the Danish fleet, and had been ever after paid into the royal exchequer. On a certain occasion the lords of the kingdom understanding that the king’s exchequer had been exhausted by his excessive alms, raised upon their vassals a large sum, unknown to him, and one Christmas begged his majesty to accept that free present of his grateful subjects to clothe his soldiers, and defray other public expenses. St. Edward, surprised to see such a heap of money gathered into his exchequer, returned his thanks to his affectionate subjects, but expressed a great abhorrence of what he called a pillaging of the poor, and commanded that it should be returned every farthing to those that had given it. His great alms and actions of pious liberality showed what the sole retrenching of luxury and superfluity may do. His whole deportment showed how much he was master of himself. He was never morose, never appeared transported with anger, puffed up with vanity, or fond of pleasure. His conversation was agreeable, and accompanied with a certain majesty; and he delighted much to speak of God and spiritual things.

St. Edward had conceived from his youth the greatest esteem and love for the precious treasure of purity, and preserved this virtue both in mind and body without stain. St. Aëlred testifies, that, in his youth, through the warmth of his constitution, the subtle artifices of the devil, and the liberties of a court in which he lived a stranger, he sustained violent assaults; but resisted this enemy so manfully, that in all his battles he was gloriously triumphant. Humility, a life of prayer and mortification, a diligent flight of all dangerous occasions, and the practice of all manner of good works were the weapons by which he diligently armed himself against these temptations. Bearing always in mind that, A man’s enemies are those of his own household, he chastised his body by an abstemious life in the midst of dainties; for to pamper it on such occasions is as if, when a house is on fire, a man should throw dry wood on the flames. He watched all the avenues of his soul, keeping his eyes and his other senses under the strictest restraint, and an habitual government, that they should never steal any unguarded glances or other dangerous liberties; and he shunned all superfluous converse with persons of the other sex, from which at least the secret corners of the heart contract something which impairs that perfection of purity, by which the affections are entirely shut up against all creatures, and rendered fit to invite the embraces of the heavenly spouse. His triumph seemed, by rooted victorious habits both of purity and of humility, and those other virtues by which it is preserved, to be become easy and secure, when, being placed on the throne, he was entreated both by his nobility and people to take a royal consort. Earl Godwin, whose immoderate power and wealth seemed to raise him above the level of his fellow-subjects, moved every engine to make the choice fall upon his daughter Edgitha, a lady totally unlike her father, being most remarkably virtuous and abstemious; for beauty, understanding, and all accomplishments, she was the miracle of her sex. Edward seeing that reading, studying, and devotion were her whole delight, hoped she would be easily engaged to become his wife upon condition always to live in holy virginity, in imitation of the mother of God and St. Joseph; it not being in his power otherwise to marry, he having long ago consecrated himself to God by a vow of perpetual chastity, as St. Aëlred assures us. The good king earnestly recommended the matter to God, joining much fasting and almsdeeds to devout prayer, before he disclosed his purpose to the virgin. She readily assented to his religious desire, so that, being joined together in holy wedlock, they always lived as brother and sister, and their example was afterwards imitated by St. Henry and St. Elzear. To ascribe this resolution of St. Edward to an aversion to earl Godwin, is a slander repugnant to the original writers of St. Edward’s history, and to the character of his virtue, with which so strange a resentment, and so unjust a treatment of a virtuous lady whom he had made his queen, would have been very inconsistent. Godwin was the richest and greatest subject in the realm; Canute had made him general of his army, and earl of Kent, and had given him in marriage, not his sister, as Tyrrel and some others mistake, but his sister-in-law, or the sister of count Ulpho, his brother-in-law, as Pontanus calls her. He was afterwards high-treasurer, and duke of West-Sex, that is, general of the army in all the provinces that lay south of Mercia, then called West-Sex. That part of his estate in Kent which was overflowed by the sea, retains from him the name of Godwin sands. An unbounded ambition made him often trample on the most sacred laws, divine and human. Swein, his youngest son, being convicted of having offered violence to a nun, was banished by St. Edward into Denmark, but pardoned some years after. Godwin, for repeated disobedience and treasons, was himself outlawed, unless he appeared according to a summons sent him before the king at Gloucester, who had assembled there an army under the earls Leofric and Siward. Godwin refused to stand his trial, and returning from Flanders, whither he had first fled, marched with an armed force towards the king. But Edward, whose army was much superior in strength, through the mediation of certain friends, pardoned him in 1053, and restored him to his estates and dignity. During the rebellion of Godwin it was judged necessary that the queen his daughter should be confined in the nunnery of Warewell, lest her dignity might be made use of to encourage or give countenance to the vassals and friends of the earl. 7 Notwithstanding this precaution of state prudence, from the regard which St. Edward showed to his queen even after the death of earl Godwin, and when the king lay at the point of death, it is evident that they had for each other the most affectionate and sincere esteem, and tender chaste love.

Many actions of kings, in public trials and certain affairs of state, are rather the actions of their counsel than their own. This is sometimes necessary that no room be left to suspect that scandalous public crimes are by an unjust connivance passed over with impunity, or that any essential part of the duties and protection which a prince owes his people, is neglected. This accounts, in some measure, for the good king’s behaviour towards his mother, in the famous trial which she underwent. The fact is related by Brompton, 8 Knyghton, 9 Harpsfield, and others, though no mention is made of it by Ingulphus or any others who lived nearest the time. Certain wicked men who desired to engross alone the confidence of the king, and the entire administration of the government, set their wits to work to invent some wicked plot for ruining the queen-mother in the opinion of the king. Ambition puts on every shape to obtain its ends, and often suffers more for the devil than would gain a high crown in heaven. These courtiers could play the hypocrites, and had no hopes of surprising the religious king but under some pretence of piety. Queen Emma often saw Alwin, the pious bishop of Winchester, by whose advice she governed her conscience. She was therefore accused of having had criminal conversation with him. Her chastity must have been very perfect and very wary, that calumny itself could find no other but so holy a man to fasten upon. Robert, archbishop of Canterbury, formerly abbot of Jumiege, whom Edward had brought over with him from Normandy, was drawn into a persuasion of her guilt. Her enemies loaded her, moreover, with invectives and accusations for having consented, not only to marry Canute, the enemy of her former husband’s family, but also to have favoured Hardicanute, to the prejudice of the right of her children by her first husband, and of the whole Saxon line, to whose exclusion from all share in the kingdom she consented in the articles of this second marriage, agreeing that the crown of all England should be settled on her issue by Canute; though Canute himself altered this settlement by will, so far as to leave only Denmark to Hardicanute, and England to Harold, whom he had by a former wife or concubine: for he looked upon his possession of England as founded in the right of conquest. The law of nations allows this to give a title when it is in itself just, or the fruit of a just and necessary war, which a prince undertakes after all other ways of doing justice to his people and crown had been tried and failed, and which he always carried on in the dispositions of peace the moment he could obtain the just rights he was obliged to pursue by that violent method. But Canute’s possession, especially of West-Sex, (under which name was then comprised also Sussex and whatever lying on the south side of the Thames was, by Canute’s partition, left to the English Saxons) was an unjust usurpation; and, for Emma voluntarily to concur to the exclusion of the rightful heirs, was an inexcusable and unnatural step, for which only her repentance could atone. To this charge, however, Edward seemed altogether insensible; and perhaps never was any man more remarkably so, even toward strangers, with regard to private or personal injuries. The accusation of sacrilege and incontinency disturbed him, and filled him with horror and grief beyond measure, being, on the one side, unwilling to believe so atrocious a crime, and, on the other, afraid of conniving at such a scandal. He therefore suffered the bishops to take cognizance of the cause in an assembly which they held at Winchester; and, in the mean time, the bishop was confined in that city, and Emma in the royal nunnery of Warewell in Hampshire. In the synod several bishops wished, to the king’s great satisfaction, that the cause might be dropped: but the archbishop of Canterbury insisted so warmly on the enormity of the scandal, and the necessity and obligation of penance and a public reparation, that the synod was worked up to the severest resolutions. The injured queen could only have recourse to God, like another Susanna, against the malice of her perjured accusers, and, in proof of her innocence, trusting in him who is the protector of the oppressed, offered herself to the trial of Ordeal. 10 Accordingly, after the night had been spent in imploring the divine protection through the intercession of St. Swithin, Queen Emma walked blindfold and barefoot over nine red-hot ploughshares, laid in St. Swithin’s church in Winchester, without receiving the least hurt, so that when she was gone over them she asked how far she was from her purgation? Upon which her eyes were uncovered, and looking behind her upon the ploughshares which she had passed over, she burst into praises of God for her wonderful deliverance. 11 The king, who, anxious for the event, had not ceased all this while earnestly to recommend it to God, seeing this testimony of heaven in favour of the innocence of his dear mother, full of gratitude to her deliverer, cast himself at her feet, begged pardon for his fault of credulity, and in satisfaction received the discipline from two bishops who were present. In acknowledgment for this miraculous favour he bestowed on the church of St. Swithin at Winchester, the isle of Portland and three manors: queen Emma gave to it nine manors, and bishop Alwyn nine others according to the number of ploughshares, which were kept as a memorial in that monastery. The archbishop Robert returned to Normandy, and retired to his monastery of Jumiege, after having, first, in penance, performed a pilgrimage to St. Peter’s tomb at Rome. The king commanded all his mother’s goods and estates which had been seized, to be restored to her. She afterwards died at Winchester in 1052.

The following year was remarkable for the death of Earl Godwin, who fell down dead whilst he was at supper with the king at Winchester, 12 or, according to Brompton, 13 at Windsor, in 1053. Ralph of Disse, Brompton, and others say, that, thinking the king still harboured a suspicion of his having been the contriver of his brother Alfred’s death, he wished that if he was guilty he might never swallow a morsel of meat which he was putting into his mouth; and that he was choked with it. This circumstance, however, is not mentioned by Ingulf, who wrote soon after. Harold succeeded his father Godwin in the earldom of Kent, and in his other dignities. 14 Griffith, prince of South Wales, having made inroads into Herefordshire, the king ordered Harold to curb him, which he executed. This Griffith some years after was taken prisoner, and put to death by Griffith-ap-Shewelyn, King or Prince of North Wales, who sent his head to Harold, and presents to King Edward, who was so generous as to bestow the kingdom of the former which his troops had conquered, on the late prince’s two brothers, Blechgent and Rithwalag, who swore allegiance to Edward. 15 In 1058 the king suffered a great loss by the death of the pious and most valiant Earl Siward. So great was this soldier’s passion for arms that in his agony he regretted as a misfortune his dying on his bed like a cow, and calling for his armour, expired as soon as he had it on. The year before, by the king’s orders, he had led an army into Scotland, with which he discomfited the usurper Macbeth, and restored Malcolm III. to the throne. In this war, upon receiving news that his son was killed in the battle against Macbeth, he only asked whether he was wounded before or behind, and being assured that he fell fighting valiantly, and was wounded before, he comforted himself, saying, he wished not a more glorious death for his son or himself. 16 It is rare for so strong an inclination to arms to be under the influence and direction of virtue; which, however, was the character of this brave soldier. He was buried in the monastery of Saint Mary at York. 17 The earldom of Northumberland was given first to Tosti, a son of the late Earl Godwin; and he being soon after banished for his oppressions and crimes, to Morkard, a grandson of Leofric, Earl of Mercia or Chester. The death of Siward was followed by that of Leofric, who was the most prudent and religious counsellor of St. Edward, being for his wisdom, the Nestor of his age, and by his piety a perfect model of Christian perfection. His immense charities to the poor, the great number of churches which he repaired or built, and the great monastery which he founded at Coventry, were public monuments of his zeal and beneficence, which virtues were proved genuine by his sincere humility and devotion. The exemptions and privileges which his pious and charitable lady Godiva obtained of him for the city of Coventry, have commended their memory to the latest posterity in those parts. 18 In the pious and wise counsels of this great man, St. Edward, who most frequently resided at Islip, found his greatest comfort and support. His son Alfgar was made Duke of Mercia, but fell short of his father’s reputation.

The laws framed by St. Edward were the fruit of his wisdom, and that of his counsellors. Under the heptarchy King Ethelbert in 602, and King Wihtred in 696, published laws, or dooms for the kingdom of Kent; Ina in 693 for West-Sex, and Offa, about the year 790, for the Mercians. 19 After the union of the heptarchy, from these former laws Alfred formed a new short code in 877: Athelstan, Edmund, Edgar, and Ethelred did the like. Canute added several new laws. Guthrun, the Danish king, who was baptized, and made an alliance with King Alfred, published with him laws for the Danes who then ruled the East-Angles and Northumbrians. Edward the Confessor reduced all these laws into one body, with amendments and additions; which code from this time became common to all England, under the name of Edward the Confessor’s Laws, by which title they are distinguished from the posterior laws of the Norman kings; they are still in force as part of the common law of England, unless in things altered by later statutes: 20 they consisted in short positive precepts, in which judges kept close to the words of the law, being not reasoned away either by the judges or advocates, says Mr. Gurdon. In them punishments were very mild; scarcely any crimes were capital, and amercements and fines were certain, determined by the laws, not inflicted at the will and pleasure of the judges. The public peace and tranquillity were maintained, and every one’s private property secured; not by the rigour of the laws, but by the severity and diligence with which they were executed, and justice administered. Whence Mr. Gurdon says: 21 This king’s religious and just administration was as much or more valued by the people than the text of the laws.” It is the remark of the same ingenious author in another place: 22 “Edward the Confessor, that great and good legislator, reigned in the hearts of his people. The love, harmony, and good agreement between him and the great council of the nation, 23 produced such a happiness as to be the measure of the people’s desires in all succeeding reigns; the law and government of King Edward being petitioned for, and strenuously contended for, by the English and Norman barons.” The saint’s historians relate, as an instance of his extreme lenity and goodness, that as he seemed one day asleep in his chamber, he saw a servant boy come twice and steal a considerable quantity of money out of a great sum which Hugoline, the keeper of his privy purse, had left exposed: and that when the boy came a third time, he only bade him take care, for Hugoline was coming, who, if he caught him, would have him severely whipped, and he would lose his booty. When Hugoline came in, and burst into a rage for the loss, the king bade him be easy, for the person who had taken the money wanted it more than they did. Some moderns censure this action. But we must observe that the king, doubtless, took all care that the thief should be made sensible of his sin, and did not imagine he would return to the theft; also that he regarded it merely as a personal injury which he was always ready to forgive; and that this single private instance of such a pardon was not imprudent, or would have any influence on the administration of public justice. Saints are always inclined to pardon personal injuries; and in these cases easily persuade themselves that lenity may be used without offending against prudence. No prince seems to have understood better than St. Edward what he owed to the protection of his people, to the laws, and to public justice; in administering which, he walked in the steps of the great King Alfred, and proposed to himself as a model his severity in inspecting into the conduct of his judges. William the Bastard, Duke of Normandy, came into England, to pay a visit to the king his cousin in 1052, the year before Godwin’s death. 24

St. Edward during his exile in Normandy had made a vow to perform a pilgrimage to St. Peter’s tomb at Rome, if God should be pleased ever to put an end to the misfortunes of his family. When he was settled on the throne he began to prepare suitable gifts and offerings to make to the altar of the apostle, and to put things in order for his journey. For this purpose he held a great council, in which he declared his vow, and the obligation he lay under of returning thanks in the best manner he was able to the divine clemency, propounded the best methods to be taken for securing commerce and the public peace, and affectionately commended all his dear subjects to the divine mercy and protection. The whole assembly of the governors and chief men of the provinces made strong expostulations against his design. They commended his devotion, but with tears represented to him that the kingdom would be left exposed to domestic divisions and to foreign enemies; and had already before their eyes slaughters, civil wars, armies of fierce Danes, and every other calamity. The king was moved by their entreaties and reasons, and consented that the matter should be referred to Leo IX. who then sat in St. Peter’s chair. Aëlred, Archbishop of York, and Herman, Bishop of Winchester, with two abbots, were despatched to Rome on this errand.

The pope, considering the impossibility of the king’s leaving his dominions exposed to such grievous dangers and calamities, dispensed with his vow upon condition that, by way of commutation, he should give to the poor the sum he would have expended in his journey, and should moreover build or repair and endow a monastery in honour of St. Peter. King Edward having received this brief, after due deliberation, pitched upon a spot where to erect this royal abbey. Sebert, king of the East-Angles, nephew to St. Ethelbert, upon his conversion, founded the cathedral of St. Paul’s in London, and also, according to Sulcard, without the walls on the west of that city, a monastery in honour of St. Peter, called Thorney, where a temple of Apollo is said to have stood in the time of the Romans, and to have been thrown down by an earthquake. But, from the silence of Bede, Mr. Widmore thinks this little monastery was built something later, and by some private person. It is first mentioned in a charter of King Offa, in 785. This monastery was called Thorney, and being destroyed by the Danes, was restored by King Edgar. St. Edward, invited by the situation and other circumstances, repaired and endowed the same in a most magnificent manner out of his own patrimony, and obtained of Pope Nicholas II. the most ample exemptions and privileges for it dated in 1059. 25 From its situation it was called Westminster, and is famous for the coronation of our kings, and the burial of great persons, and was, at the dissolution, the richest abbey in England. William of Malmesbury, 26 St. Aëlred, Brompton, and others relate, that St. Edward, whilst he resided in a palace near this church, cured an Irishman named Gillemichel, who was entirely a cripple, and was covered with running sores. The king carried him on his back, and set him down sound, though Sulcard takes no notice of this miracle. The same historians mention, that a certain woman had a swelling in her neck, under her chin, full of corruption and exhaling a noisome smell. Being admonished in a dream, she addressed herself to the king for his blessing. St. Edward washed the ulcerous sore and blessed it with the sign of the cross; after which the sore burst, and cleansed itself, and the patient was healed. Malmesbury adds, that it was the constant report of such as well knew the life of Edward, that he had healed many of the same disease whilst he lived in Normandy. Hence was derived the custom of our kings touching for the cure of that species of scrophulous tumour called the king’s-evil. Peter of Blois, in 1180, wrote in a letter from the court of Henry II. that the king had touched persons in this manner. 27 In the records of the Tower it appears, that in 1272, Edward I. gave gold medals to those whom he had touched for this distemper, as Mr. Becket acknowledges. Queen Elizabeth laid aside the sign of the cross in the ceremony, in which she was imitated by the three succeeding kings, though they all continued the practice; and Charles I. in 1650, by a pompous proclamation, invited all who stood in need of it, to repair to him, that they might be made partakers of the heavenly gift. 28King Edward resided sometimes at Winchester, sometimes at Windsor or at London; but most ordinarily at Islip, in Oxfordshire, where he was born. 29 Formerly noblemen lived on their estates amidst their tenants and vassals, and only repaired to court on certain great festivals, or when called by the king upon extraordinary occasions. Christmas being one of the chief feasts on which the nobility waited on the king, St. Edward, when the buildings were finished, chose that solemnity for the dedication of the new church at Westminster. The ceremony was performed with great devotion and the utmost pomp, the bishop and nobility of the whole kingdom assisting thereat, as Sulcard testifies. The king signed the charter of the foundation, and of the immunities and privileges granted to this church, to which were annexed the most dreadful spiritual comminations against those who should ever presume to infringe the same. 30 Next to the prince of the apostles this holy king had a singular devotion to St. John Evangelist, the great model of holy purity and divine charity; and it is related in his life, that he was forewarned by that glorious Evangelist of his approaching dissolution, in recompense of his religious devotion, in never refusing any just and reasonable request that was made him for the sake, or in the name of that saint. The pious king, by his munificent foundation hoped to erect a standing monument of his zeal for the divine honour, and of his devotion to the holy apostle St. Peter, and to establish a seminary of terrestrial angels, by whom a perpetual holocaust of divine praise and love might be paid to God with chaste affections disengaged from the world, and all earthly things, for all succeeding ages, when he should be no longer on earth to praise God here himself: also by the fervour of many pious servants of God he desired to supply the defects and imperfection of his own devotion in the divine love and service. At the same time he renewed with the utmost fervour the entire oblation, which he had never failed all his life continually to make of his heart, and of all that he had or was to the divine glory, begging he might be made, through the divine mercy, an eternal sacrifice of love. In these dispositions, he sung with holy Simeon: Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace. Being taken ill before the ceremony of the dedication was over, he hastened the same and continued to assist at it to the end. He then betook himself to his bed, and by the most perfect exercises of devotion and the sacraments of the church, prepared himself for his passage to eternity. In his last moments, seeing his nobles all bathed in tears round his bed, and his affectionate and virtuous queen sobbing more vehemently and weeping more bitterly than the rest, he said to her with great tenderness: “Weep not, my dear daughter; I shall not die, but shall live. Departing from the land of the dying, I hope to see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living.” 31 Commending her to her brother Harold, and certain other lords, he declared he left her an untouched virgin. 32 He calmly expired on the 5th of January, in 1066, having reigned twenty-three years, six months, and twenty-seven days, in the sixty-fourth year of his age. Never was king more sincerely or more justly regretted by his subjects; and to see the happiness of the good Confessor’s reign revived, was the constant and highest object of all the temporal wishes of their posterity for many succeeding ages. William the Conqueror, who ascended the throne in October the same year St. Edward died, caused his coffin to be enclosed in a rich case of gold and silver. His queen Edgitha survived the saint many years. Ingulf, a learned Norman monk, whom the Conqueror made abbot of Croyland, and who was intimately acquainted with her, very much extols her learning, humility, invincible meekness, and extensive goodness towards all ranks. 33 All our historians give her the same great and amiable character. Whence Speed calls her a lady of incomparable piety. When she lay on her death-bed, she assured upon oath many that were present, that she had lived with the king Edward only as sister, and died a maid. 34 By the Conqueror’s order she was buried by St. Edward, and her coffin was covered with plates of silver and gold. 35 In 1102, the body of St. Edward was found entire, the limbs flexible, and the clothes fresh. Soon after a certain Norman, whose name was Ralph, and who was an entire cripple, recovered the use of his limbs by praying at his tomb, and six blind men were restored in like manner to their sight; which miracles, with some others, being duly proved, the saint was canonized by Alexander III. in 1161, 36 and his festival began to be kept on the 5th of January. Two years after, a solemn translation of his body (which was found incorrupt, and in the same condition as formerly) was performed by St. Thomas, archbishop of Canterbury, in presence of King Henry II. and many persons of distinction on the 13th of October; on which day his principal festival is now kept. The national council of Oxford, 1222, commanded his feast to be kept in England a holyday. Out of respect to the memory of St. Edward, the kings of England to this day, at their coronation, receive his crown, and put on his dalmatic and maniple, as a part of the royal robes, though even the crown has been since changed, and now only bears St. Edward’s name, being made in imitation of his. 37

St. Edward was a saint in the midst of a court, and in a degenerate age. Such an example must convince us, that for any to impute their want of a Christian spirit and virtue to the circumstances of their state or situation, is a false and foolish pretence: a proof of which is, that if these were changed, they would still remain the same persons. The fault lies altogether in their own sloth and passions. One who is truly in earnest, makes dangers and difficulties a motive of greater vigilance, application, and fervour, and even converts them into the means of his greater sanctification. Temperance and mortification may be practised, the spirit of true devotion acquired, and all virtues exercised by the divine grace, even in an heroic degree, where a desire and resolution does not fall short. From obstacles and contradictions themselves the greatest advantages may be reaped: by them patience, meekness, humility, and charity are perfected, and the soul is continually awaked, and quickened, into a lively sense of her duty to God.

Note 1. Wisd. vi. 26. [back]

Note 2. Ecclus. x. 2, 3. [back]

Note 3. Edward, the son of Edmund Ironside, nephew to St. Edward the Confessor, was the next heir of the Saxon line; whence some modern English condemn the accession of the Confessor, who certainly could derive no right from the unjust Danish conquest, as Bedford, or whoever was the author of the book entitled Hereditary Rights, &c., pretends. But it is evident from Mr. Earberry (Occasional Historian, n. 4,) that during the reign of the English Saxons, when the next heir was esteemed by the states unfit in dangerous or difficult times, the king’s thanes advanced another son or brother of the deceased king, so as never to take one that was not of his family. Often, if the heir was a minor, an uncle was made king; and, upon the uncle’s death, though he left issue, the crown reverted to the former heir, or his children, as the very inspection of a table of their succession shows. (See Mr. Squire’s Diss. on the English Saxon Government, an. 1753.) Cerdic, founder of the kingdom of the West-Saxons, in 495, from whom the Confessor descended, was the tenth from Woden, according to the Saxon Chronicle, published by Bishop Gibson, from an original copy which formerly belonged to the abbey of Peterborough, was given by Archbishop Laud to the Bodleian library at Oxford, and is more correct than the copies in the Cotton library, and at Cambridge, made use of by Wheloc. This most valuable chronicle derives also the pedigrees of Hengist and his successors in Kent, and of the kings of Mercia and Northumberland, from

Woden, whom Bede calls the father of the royal Saxon lineage in England, or of the chief kings in the heptarchy; he must have preceded the reign of Dioclesian. Some take him to have been the great god of this name honoured by the Saxons; others a mighty king who bore the name of that false god. That the regal succession in the heptarchy was hereditary, and when interrupted, again restored, is manifest from the above chronicle. The Norman carried so high his claim of conquest, as to set himself above all established laws and rights, and to exclude his son Robert from the crown; but the succession was deemed hereditary, after Stephen at least. The unanimous sense and approbation of the whole nation, and of all foreign states, in the succession of St. Edward, demonstrates the legality of the proceedings by which he was called to the crown; which no one, either at home or abroad, ever thought of calling in question; so clear was the law or custom in that case. The posture of affairs then required that the throne should be immediately filled before a Dane should step into it. Edward Atheling was absent at a great distance, and unequal to the difficulties of the state; nor could matters be brought to bear that his arrival could be waited for. St. Edward afterwards sent for him with his whole family, in 1054, and treated him as his heir; and after that prince’s death, behaved towards his son Edgar in the same manner, who was also styled by him Atheling or Adeling. The Greek title Clyto, or Illustrious, given to the prince royal by our ancestors, was by them changed into the Saxon word Atheling, from Adel, Noble, the termination ing signified a person’s descent, as Malmesbury takes notice. (l. 1, de Reg. c. 3.) Thus Edgaring was the son of Edgar; and in France, Meroving and Carloving, son of Meroveus and Charles.

The spelling of our saint’s name was altered upon his accession to the throne; till that time it is constantly spelled in the Saxon Chronicle Eadward, even two years before; but in 1042, Edward, which is observable also in his coins; though Eadmund and Eadward are found in later MSS. This is one of the arguments by which Bishop Gibson (pref.) shows this chronicle to have been one of the public registers which were written by persons deputed to record all transactions of the times, and preserved in the royal monasteries, as the Scoti-chronicon informs us. The Saxon Chronicle ends in 1154. On it see Nicolson’s English Historical Library, p. 114. [back]

Note 4. Ose. viii. 4. [back]

Note 5. For this deliverance from the Danes the festival of Hoctide or Houghtide, is thought to have formerly been kept in England as a day of rejoicing on the 8th of June, or on the Wednesday on which Hardicanute died. It was celebrated with dancing and drawing cords across the highway, to stop people till they paid some money. See John Rouse, De Regibus Angliæ ed. Hearne. [back]

Note 6. Impositions of taxes were made regular in the reigns of Edward III. in England, and Philip of Valois in France. See in the ingenious History of Taxes the gradual progress that has been made in them. The great estates of the crown have been, for the greatest part,   alienated. [back]

Note 7. From this circumstance some moderns falsely pretend that the king had an aversion to his queen. Whereas the historians who wrote nearest that time, assure us that he always treated her as queen, and with the highest regard and tenderness, no way imputing to her the crimes of her father. This short removal of her person from court was an action of state prudence, the circumstances of which cannot be known at this distance of time; nor can we judge better of it than from the known characters of those who were the authors of it. No sooner was her father pardoned but she was recalled to court, and all respect shown her, as formerly. Had there been any coldness between her and the king he would have certainly treated her otherwise. He pardoned the father perhaps as much on her account as out of motives of clemency. Leofric and Siward were an overmatch for Godwin in power, and the weakness of his efforts in this rebellion shows his attempt to have been no less rash than wicked, in which his own vassals would probably have forsaken him. Leofric and Siward were both persons eminent for virtue and prudence, the former, one of the wisest, most munificent, and religious statesmen, the latter, one of the bravest and most experienced soldiers this island ever produced. When Swein or Sueno, Godwin’s son, had offered violence to a nun in 1046, the father’s power was not sufficient to protect him; though, after he had been long an exile in Denmark, the father being supported by the joint supplications of Leofric and others that were at the head of affairs, obtained his pardon. But, for a murder of Count Beorn, his kinsman, he was afterwards obliged to go on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, and from Milan thither barefoot. He died in Lycia on his return, in 1052. [back]

Note 8. Chron. inter 10 Scriptor. [back]

Note 9. De Eventibus Angliæ, ib. t. 2, p. 2329. [back]

Note 10. Ordeal is derived from the Saxon Or, Great, and Deal, Judgment. (See John Stiernhook, l, 1, de Jure Sueonum Vetusto, c. 8; Hicks, Dissertatio Epistol. p. 149; also Spelman and Du Cange’s Glossaries, both in the new edit.) This trial was instituted to come at the truth of facts not sufficiently proved. First, the person accused purged himself by oath, if the judge and accuser admitted him to oath, and thought this satisfactory; sometimes this oath was confirmed by twelve others called Compurgators, who swore they believed it true. In trials where the oath was not admitted, the great purgation was ordered: this was of three sorts: the first, by red-hot iron (which the person accused held in his hand or walked over barefoot); the second by boiling water, into which a person dipped his hand as far as the wrist or elbow to take out a stone; the third, by cold water, or swimming persons, which practice was chiefly used in pretending to discover wizards and witches; and whereas it was originally employed only by judges, it became in the reigns of James I. and the two Charles’s, in frequent use among the common people. (See the notes on Hudibras, and Hutcheson against Witchcraft.) By the MS. history of miracles performed at the shrine of St. Thomas of Canterbury, written in the reign of Henry II. it appears that the king’s foresters and other officers and country judges, at that time frequently made use of this trial of water in examining criminals. On the prayers, fasts, &c. that preceded and accompanied the administration of Ordeal trials, see various forms transcribed from Textus Roffens, in the end of the Fasciculus Rerum, published by Mr. Brown. Such trials are allowed by the laws of King Edgar, c. 24, 62, and his successors to the end of the Conqueror’s reign; though Agobard, the learned archbishop of Lyons, who died in 840, and is honoured at Lyons among the saints on the 6th of June, wrote a book Against the Judgments of God, wherein he proves such trials to be tempting God, and contrary to his law, and to the precepts of charity. See his works published by Baluze. (t. 1, p. 301.) These trials were condemned by the council of Worms in 829. See on them Baluze, (Capitul. Regum Franc. t. 2, pp. 639, 654; Goldast. Constit. Imper. t. 2, p. 301,) and chiefly Dom Bernard Pez. (Anecdotorum Thesaurus Novus, Augustæ Vindelic, an. 1721, t. 2, part 2, pp. 635, 648.) Alexander II. formerly the Conqueror’s own ghostly father, absolutely forbade them by a decree extant. (Causa 2, quæst. 5, c. 7.) A council at Mentz, in 847, having enjoined the ordeal of plough-shares to suspected servants, Pope Stephen V. condemned it in an epistle to the Bishop of Mentz. (Causa 2, quæst. 5, c. 20.) All such trials were before condemned by St. Gregory the Great. (Cap. Mennam. c. 2, qu. 5.) Such practices, for which there is no warrant of a divine institution, or promise of a supernatural interposition, are superstitious and tempting God. They sprung up among the northern nations, but were condemned by the see of Rome whenever any notice of them reached it. The first legal prohibition of Ordeal, mentioned by Sir H. Spelman in England, is in a letter from King Henry III. to his justices itinerant in the north, in the third year of his reign: some great lawyers say it was suppressed by act of parliament that year. (See Johnson’s English Canons, an. 1065.) A purgation by oath was called in law Legal Purgation; that of Ordeal Vulgar Purgation. (See Gonzales in Decretales.) Where these trials prevailed by the sanction of certain particular bishops, examples are recorded of God favouring the simplicity and piety of some persons with a miraculous protection of the innocent. Of this, amongst others, a remarkable instance is recorded in the monk Peter, surnamed Igneus, at Florence, in 1067. See Macquer, Fleury, &c. l. 61, n. 27, p. 183, t. 13.)

Purgations by single combats of the accuser and the accused person were instituted by the Burgundians, introduced in England by the Conqueror, and continued later than Henry III. though always condemned at Rome. See Gerdil. Tr. des Combats Singuliers, c. 11, 71. 167. [back]

Note 11. Brompton, Knyghton, Tho. Rudborne, &c. See Harpsfield, Parker, in vit. Roberti archiep. Alford ad an. 1047. [back]

Note 12. Ralph of Disse, in chron. p. 476, &c. [back]

Note 13. P. 944. [back]

Note 14. Such dignities were at that time titles of high offices and governments. The Roman emperors had in their courts, besides several great officers of the state, certain select noblemen who were called the Companions of the Emperor, Comites imperatoris. Suetonius mentions them as early as the reign of Tiberius. Constantine the Great, having formed the government of the empire upon a new model, gave to many officers of his court the title of Count, as the Count of the privy purse, of the stable, &c. also to many governors abroad, as the Count of the East. &c. Those who had the command of the armies in a certain country were called dukes or generals, as the Duke of Egypt. Pepin, Charlemagne, and all the other Carlovignian princes, gave these titles, though at first very rarely, to some whom they vested with a limited and dependent kind of sovereignty in some country. Thus Charlemagne created a duke of Bavaria. Feudatory laws were unknown to the world till framed by the Lombards in Italy, the first authors of feudatory lands and principalities. Pepin and Charlemagne began to introduce something of them in Germany and France, where they were afterwards exceedingly multiplied in the reigns of weak princes, and by various accidents. The emperor Otho I. instituted the title of count, duke, &c. which till then had denoted high posts of command and jurisdiction, to be frequently borne merely as badges of honour, and to be hereditary in illustrious families: which example was immediately copied in France and other kingdoms.

In England, the Saxon title and office of ealderman of a country was changed in the ninth age into the Danish title of Earl: which office was of its own nature merely civil; the military governor or general of the army was called by the Saxons, Heartogh; which title is given to Hengist, &c. in the Saxon Chronicle, and was afterwards exchanged for that of duke. On these earls or viceroys sometimes a kind of limited sovereignty was conferred. Such was bestowed by Alfred on his son-in-law Ethelred, Ealderman or earl of Mercia, as William of Malmesbury testifies. A homage being reserved to the king, these provinces were still regarded as members or districts of the kingdom, though such earls were a kind of petty kings. Under our Norman kings such sovereign earldoms or duchies were distinguished amongst us by the epithet of Palatines.

The kings of France of the third race made several governments hereditary under the title of Counties, &c. reserving to the crown some homage or acknowledgment as for fiefs. The Normans introduced hereditary titles of honour in England, substituting barons instead of king’s thanes, who long held capital estates and vassalages in fee. Earls and dukes frequently retained long after this some jurisdiction in the counties which gave them their honours. I have had in my possession an original MS. ordinance of John Talbot, earl of Shrewsbury, in which, by an act which is called perpetual, he commands that every musician who shall play on any instrument within the limits of his county of Salop, shall pay a small sum to a certain chapel of our Lady, under pain of forfeiting their instruments, with other ordinances of the like nature. This pious and excellent nobleman was killed at Northampton fighting for Henry VI. in 1460, and was buried in St. Mary’s chapel in the church of St. Cuthbert at Worksop, as is mentioned by Rob. Glover (in Geneal. istorum Comitum) and Thoreton in his Nottinghamshire. See Selden, On Titles of Honour, Op. vol. 2. Also, Janus Anglorum, On English Distinctions of Honour, vol. 3, and Spelman’s Glossary, ed. noviss.

The title of Dominus appeared at first so insolent and haughty that Augustus and Tiberius would not allow it to be given them. Caligula first assumed it. Shortly after it was given, not only to emperors, but likewise to all governors and courtiers. In France it was long given only to kings; and the epithet of Senior to noblemen, equivalent to the English Ealderman. From Dominus was derived Dam, which in France was long used only of God and the king. At length it became common to all noblemen: but for some ages has been reserved to the female sex. From Senior came Seigneur, Sieur, Sire, and Messire. In the reigns of Lewis XII. and Francis I. in France Sire was a vulgar title; whence our English Sir. Sire since that time has been appropriated to the French kings. The Franks for many ages took no titles but the names of their manors or residence, as of Herstal, &c. See Glatigny, Œuvres Posthumes.—Discours sur les Titres d’Honneur. Paris, 1757. [back]

Note 15. See Echard’s Hist. of Engl. t. 1, p. 122, and Percy Enderbie’s British and Welch History, p. 215. [back]

Note 16. Brompton in Chron. [back]

Note 17. Ibid. [back]

Note 18. See Brompton in Chron. and Dugdale’s Warwickshire by Lye. [back]

Note 19. See these laws extant in Sir H. Spelman’s Concilia Brit. in Lambard, Saxon Leg. more correct in Wilkins, Conc. M. Britann. See also Hicks, Diss. Epist. Wheloc, and Johnson’s Canons. [back]

Note 20. The laws of Edward the Confessor were with great solemnity confirmed by William the Conqueror in the fourth year of his reign. (Conc. t. 9, p. 1020, 1024.) These are comprised in twenty-two articles. It appears by the partiality shown to the Normans that certain clauses were added by him. Ingulf, at the end of his history of Croyland, has inserted fifty other laws of the Confessor, merely civil, which are published by Selden. (Not. in Eadmer, Hist. Novor. p. 116, 123.) These were also ratified by the Conqueror, who, as Eadmer testifies, (Hist. Novor. l. 1, p. 29,) afterwards introduced in England many Norman laws, though they are not now to be distinguished from those of his successors. Sir Thomas Craig, in his celebrated Jus Feudale, observes that the principal statutes of the English law are borrowed from the usages of France, and principally of Normandy. (See Journ. des Scav. 1716, p. 634.) The Conqueror caused those of the Confessor to be translated into French, in which language he would have causes pleaded. For the Normans were at that time become French both by their language and manners.

The great survey of all the lands, castles, &c. in England was made by the Conqueror in the eighteenth or twentieth year of his reign, and two authentic copies drawn, one of which was lodged in the archives at Westminster, the other at Winchester cathedral, as Tho. Rudborne informs us. (Angl. sacra, t. 1, p. 259.) This register or survey, called by the English The Red Book, or more frequently Dooms-day Book, often quotes the usages and survey of Edward the Confessor, as appears from the curious and interesting extract of English Saxon customs copied from this MS. by Mr. Gale. (Angl. Script. 15, t. 2, p. 759.) Alfred first made a general survey, but this only comprised Shires, Hundreds, and Tenths or Tythings. The survey of the Confessor perhaps was of this nature. That of the Conqueror was made with the utmost rigour and such minute accuracy, that there was not a hyde of land, (about sixty-four acres) the yearly revenue or rent whereof, and the name of the proprietors which were not enregistered, with the meadows, arable land, forests, rivers, number of cattle, and of the inhabitants in towns and villages, &c. [back]

Note 21. History of the Parliament, t. 1, p. 47. [back]

Note 22. Ib. p. 37. [back]

Note 23. The Wittena-Gemot or Mycel Synod, that is, Council of the Wites, or Great Council, was the assembly of the States of the Nation. How far its authority extended, or of what persons it was composed, is much controverted. Its name, derived from the Wites, seems only to imply the great thanes or lords and governors; yet Ina, Egbert, Alfred, Edgar, Canute, &c. in their charters and laws mention the permission, approbation, and consent of the people; which some take for an argument in favour of the commons having had a share in the great assembly of the nation. The Conqueror had certainly no council by which he could be controlled in anything. Nevertheless the ancient statutes concerning the holding the parliament in England, ascribed in the preface to Edward the Confessor, are there said to have been corrected and approved by the Conqueror. In them is regulated the manner of assembling this court in twenty-five articles; but it seems not to be doubted but several of them are added in posterior reigns after the Conqueror. They are extant in D’Achery’s Spicilegium, t. 12, p. 557. Though the name of Parliament was new and French, this court was looked upon in the wars of the barons as a restoration of the great council of the nation under the English Saxons, though doubtless the form was considerably altered. And the little mention that is made of this Wittena-Gemot in the Saxon Chronicle, seems to indicate that its transactions were not then so famous. As to the other chief English Saxon courts, the Shire-Gemot or Folk-Mote was held twice a year to determine the causes of the county. In it the bishop and the ealderman presided; in the absence of the former, an ecclesiastical deputy of the latter, the high sheriff, held their places. The Conqueror excused the bishops from assisting at this court; but they had their own court for ecclesiastical matters. Every thane of the first class had a court, in which he determined matters relating to his vassals. This was the original of the Court Baron under the Normans, though causes which were formerly tried here, for near three hundred years, are reserved to the king’s courts; and those which were judged by the ealderman, or earl, or his sheriff, &c. are long since determined by itinerant royal judges. The king presided in his own court, and in his absence the chancellor: to this lay appeals from all Shire-Gemots, &c. In this court Alfred condemned to death forty-four judges of inferior courts, convicted of neglect in the administration of justice; though mild in his laws he was rigid in their execution. To this council of the king succeeded the court of King’s Bench, and Common Pleas. See Lambard, On the laws of the ancient English, Selden, Spelman, Somner, Drake, and particularly Squires. [back]

Note 24. The Norman historians pretend that St. Edward, some say on that occasion, others before he was king, promised to settle upon him the kingdom of England; others say, he gave it him by will. But the whole seems a Norman fiction to abate the national prejudices against the Conqueror. Why was no such will or promise ever produced? How could Edward pretend to make an unprecedented alteration in the settlement: and this without so much as laying it before the council of the nation? On the Contrary, he certainly called over his nephew Edward as his heir, in 1057, and thought of no other till Edward’s death, which happened the same year, as our best historians agree. After his death he treated Edgar with the greatest affection and distinction with no other view; gave him the title of Etheling or Edeling, appropriated to the heir of the crown, or at least to princes of the blood, says Speed. Brompton writes that “he loved Edgar as if he had been his own son, and thought to leave him the heir of England.” (inter 10 Scriptor. p. 946.) The manner in which the same author mentions the disappointment of Edgar, and those who favoured his just cause by the usurpation of Harold, and again by the conquest of the Norman, evinces the same. (p. 957, 961.) St. Aëlred (alias Ethelred) shows clearly this to have been the intention of St. Edward. (l. de Geneal. Regum Angliæ inter 10 Scriptor. t. 1, p. 366.) The same may be clearly proved from Turgot, (who lived then in England, was afterwards bishop of St. Andrew’s in Scotland, and died at Durham in 1115,) also from Fordun, and even from the inconsistent authors who seem to give most credit to this idle pretension of the Norman, who himself relied on no other title than that of conquest. Harold indeed, when at sea he was driven accidentally on the coast of France, and was conducted to the duke, promised him his interest to set the crown on his head. Whence the   guilt of perjury was complicated with his usurpation. [back]

Note 25. Westminster Abbey was last of all rebuilt in the reign of Henry III. (Widmore, p. 9 and 42.) Sir Christopher Wren complains, that the Norman architects, who had been accustomed to work the soft Caen stone, chose here soft stone, like that of Rigate in Surry, which takes in water, and when frozen, scales off; whereas good stone, like that of Burford in Oxfordshire, gathers a crust, and defends itself. Hence these walls are much decayed and the stones fall off in great scales. Even in Henry the Seventh’s chapel, almost the finest Gothic piece of architecture in the world, the tender Caen stone is already eaten by the weather. For the vicissitude of heat and cold, drought and moisture, rots materials; whereas timber will bear constant moisture or cold; otherwise Venice and Amsterdam would fall. See Mr. Widmore’s History of Westminster Abbey in 1751: also his inquiry into the first foundation. This monastery was converted by Henry VIII. into a collegiate church of canons, and in 1541 into an episcopal see, Thomas Thurley being the short-lived only bishop. Queen Mary restored this abbey to the monks: Queen Elizabeth, in 1560, made it a collegiate church, with a dean and twelve prebendaries, besides a great school, with forty king’s or queen’s scholars. See Dugdale’s Monastic. t. 1, p. 55. Stow’s Survey of London and Westminster, from p. 497 to 525. Also Maitland, Tanner’s Notitia Monastic. Widmore’s History of Westminster Abbey, in 1751. On the profanations committed by the fanatics in this church, see Appendix to the Antiquities of Westminster Abbey, p. 6.

King Edward the Confessor also bestowed several estates on the episcopal see of Exeter, which he erected, or rather translated from Crediton and Cornwall, which two sees he united; and upon the death of Lewin, who was bishop of them both, he nominated Leofric first bishop of Exeter, in 1044, that these churches might not be exposed to the insults of pirates. See part of this king’s charter for the erection of this see in Leland’s Itinerary, t. 3, p. 49, 51, 53. [back]Note 26. L. 2, de Reg. c. 13. [back]

Note 27. Petr. Bles. ep. 150, ad Clericos, Aulæ regiæ, p. 235, n. 6. See Alford, Annal. ad an. 1062. [back]

Note 28. That the kings of France cure the Strumæ or King’s evil, by their touch with the sign of the cross, is confidently affirmed by the bold critic Dr. Thiers, (Tr. des Superstitions, l. 6, c. 4, p. 106,) though he calls the like notion of the seventh son a vulgar error, (ib. p. 107,) which is confirmed by the author of the Remarks, (ib.) in the Dutch edition. Guibert of Nogent, in 1100, (l. 1, de Pignor. Sanct. c. 1, p. 331,) tells us, that King Lewis the Big cured the Strumæ by his touch with the sign of the cross, which it seems he had often seen him do. He adds, that this king’s father, Philip, lost that privilege by his crimes; and that he knows that the King of England attempted nothing of that kind. But herein a foreigner may have been mistaken. William of Nangis says, that St. Lewis first used the sign of the cross in touching such diseased persons; but it appears from Guibert that he only restored the use of it. Pope Boniface VIII. in his bull for the canonization of St. Lewis, says: “Among other miracles, he conferred the benefit of health upon those that were afflicted with the king’s-evil.” Philip of Valois cured fourteen hundred of these patients. Francis I. touched for this distemper at Bologna, in presence of the pope, in 1515, and whilst he was prisoner in Spain. No one pretends that all that are touched are cured; for several are touched more than once, as F. Le Brun remarks, who maintains this privilege to be miraculous. (Hist. Critique des Superstitions, l. 4.) Patritius Armachanus, (that is, Jansenius of Ipres,) in his furious invective against the French, entitled Mars Gallicus, acknowledges this privilege in their kings. In England, the learned Bradwardin confidently ascribes this privilege to Edward III. (De Causa Dei, fol. 39.) Since the revolution, only Queen Anne has touched for this distemper. Brompton, in 1198, is said to be the first author who openly derives this gift from St. Edward the Confessor. [back]

Note 29. Mr. Hearne, our most learned and inquisitive antiquarian, in his edition of Leland’s Itinerary, takes notice that the palace of St. Edward at Islip stood on the north-east side, in a place still called Court Close, where the remains of a moat, though filled up, are still visible. At some distance stood his chapel, still in being, though employed to a profane use. The font in which St. Edward was baptized at Islip, is shown in the gardens of the late Sir George Brown, at Kiddington. [back]

Note 30. The learned Dr. Hickes (in Dissert. epist. p. 64,) pretends that Edward the Confessor was the first king of England who used a seal in his charters, such as we find in his charter given to Westminster Abbey, kept among the archives of that church, and on one of his diplomas shown in the monastery of St. Denys near Paris. This is the origin of the broad seal in England. Montfaucon exhibits three or four rough seals found on some of the charters of the Merovingian kings, the oldest of which is one of Theodoric I. (Antiq. de la Monarchie Françoise, t. 1, p. 191.) The ancient kings of Persia and Media had their seals. (Dan. vi. 17xiv. 13, 16; Esther iii. 10.) They are also mentioned by profane authors. The Benedictins in their new French Diplomatique (t. 4, p. 100, &c.) present us the prints of the heads or seals of all the ancient kings of France, from Childeric, father of Clovis; of the German emperors and kings from Charlemagne, especially from St. Henry II. in the eleventh century, in imitation of the emperors of Constantinople; of the kings of Denmark,   Bohemia, Hungary, &c. from the twelfth century. These authors prove against Hickes, Dugdale, (in his Antiq. of Warwickshire,) &c. that seals were used by the kings of England before St. Edward, Ethelbert, Edgar, St. Dunstan, even Offa during the heptarchy. St. Edward brought the more frequent use of the royal seal from France; yet he often gave charters attested by the subscription of many illustrious witnesses, with a cross to each name, without any royal seal; which was the ancient custom, and continued sometimes to be used even after the Conquest. Menage and the editors of the new Latin Glossary of Du Cange, (t. 6, p. 487,) by a gross mistake attribute to the Conqueror the first use of the royal seal in England. He only made it more solemn and common. Ingulphus, (p. 901,) the Annals of Burton, (p. 246,) &c. are to be understood that seals were not used by particulars before the Conquest: but they do not comprise the court: hence we learn the sense of that common assertion of our historians and lawyers that St. Edward was the first institutor of the broad seal.

At first kings used for their seal their own image on horseback: afterwards great men used their arms, when these became settled and hereditary. About the time of Edward III. seals became common among all the gentry. Nisbet and Mackenzie observe that they served in deeds without the subscription of any name till this was ordered in Scotland by James V. in 1540; and about the same time in England. See Bigland’s Observations on Parochial Registers, p. 81. [back]Note 31. Brompton in Chronic. p. 950. [back]

Note 32. St. Edward, in his last illness, gave a ring which he wore to the Abbot of Westminster, as William Caxton, in the reign of Henry VI. relates in his MS. Chronicle of England. It is said, in the life of the saint, to have been brought to the king by a pilgrim, as an assurance of his death being at hand, given in a vision by St. John Evangelist, though this circumstance was unknown to Sulcard. This ring of St. Edward’s was kept some time in Westminster Abbey, as a relic of the saint, and applied for curing the falling-sickness. In imitation of this, the succeeding kings were accustomed to bless rings on Good-Friday against the the cramp and the falling-sickness, till the change of religion. See Polydore Virgil, (Hist. l. 8,) Harpsfield. (Sæc. 11, c. 3.) The late king at arms, the learned and ingenious Mr. Anstis, (Rules of the Gart. t. 2, p. 223,) proves the custom of our kings blessing these rings on Good-Friday from John of Ipres, in the reign of Edward III. and from several MS. accounts of the comptrollers of the king’s household. In the chapel of Havering (so called from having this ring) in the parish of Horn-Church, near Rumford, in Essex, (once a hunting seat of the king’s,) was kept till the dissolution of abbeys, the ring given by the pilgrim to St. Edward; which Mr. Weaver says he saw represented in a window of Rumford church. The miracles chiefly produced for the canonization of St. Edward, were wrought after his death, but long before the reign of Henry II., not then trumped up to serve that occasion. [back]

Note 33. P. 895. [back]

Note 34. Malmesb. l. 2, Reg. c. 19. [back]

Note 35. Underneath St. Edward’s chapel was buried, without any monument or inscription, Maud, the most holy Queen of England, daughter to St. Margaret, and wife to Henry I. and mother to the Empress Maud, married to the Emperor Henry V. and mother of our Henry II. Queen Maud walked to church every day in Lent bare-foot and bare-legged, wearing a garment of sackcloth; she likewise washed and kissed the feet of the poorest persons, and gave them alms. The priory of Christ Church without Aldgate, and the hospital of St. Giles in the Fields were founded by her. [back]

Note 36. See Baron. ad eum ann. Alford, Annal. t. 4, p. 101. [back]

Note 37. Watts in Glossario M. Parisii, p. 282, and the Account of the Regalia. [back]

Rev. Alban Butler (1711–73).  Volume X: October. The Lives of the Saints.  1866.

SOURCE : http://www.bartleby.com/210/10/131.html

Jules Arnout, Reliekschrijn van Eduard de Belijder in de Westminster Abbeylithographie, Paris, Imp. Lemercier

Jules Arnout, Reliquaire du Roi Edouard le Confesseur, Abbaye Westminsterlithographie, Paris, Imp. Lemercier

Jules Arnout, Relics of Kind Edward the Confessor, Westminster Abbeylithographie, Paris, Imp. Lemercier


Golden Legend – Saint Edward the Confessor

Here followeth the Life of Saint Edward, King and Confessor

In old time the realm of England was greatly troubled with the Danes, so that in many kings’ days there could no peace be made, but continually war. And the Danes prevailed against England, and they brought it under their subjection, for their cruelty and tyranny was so great that, without sparing of anything, they burnt and destroyed.

But at the last it pleased Almighty God that this tyranny should cease, and sent of his grace unto this realm of England a peaceable king named Edgar, in whose birth angels sang that peace should be in his time, and so in his days was no war in England. Saint Edward, king and martyr, his son, reigned not long after him, for his stepmother did do slay him in his young age, because her son Ethelred should reign, and Saint Dunstan baptized Ethelred, and said because he defiled the fontstone that, he should live in great trouble, and so he did, for the Danes warred all his time. And this Ethelred wedded Earl Godwin’s daughter, on whom he gat Edmond Ironside. And after the death of that queen, he wedded the daughter of Richard, duke of Normandy, which hight Emma, by whom he had two sons, Alfred and Edward, which was a saint and confessor, of whom we purpose to speak. When king Ethelred was fallen in age, he made a parliament which of his two sons should be kings after him. And then by the provision of God it was concluded that Edward, which was not then born in his mother’s belly, should be king, and excluded Edmond Ironside and Alfred, which were the king’s older sons. And when the king had consented thereto, a general oath was made to perform the same in time coming. And after, when this child was born, all the land enjoyed in his birth, hoping to be greatly relieved by him. Yet always the cruelty of the Danes was so great, which the king so much doubted, that he sent the queen and his two sons Alfred and Edward, into Normandy, and took his oldest son Edmond with him to battle, to fight against the Danes. The sorrow was then great in England, for much people turned to the Danes against their own king, and without pity did burn and slay their own country with the Danes, among whom was slain Alphage, archbishop of Canterbury at Greenwich, and many other good men. And some bishops, priests, and men of religion, fled into secret places and deserts, where they devoutly prayed unto Almighty God for to have very peace in this land, but this war continued all the life of Ethelred, according to the prophecy of Saint Dunstan.

And after Ethelred, reigned Edmond Ironside his son, in full great trouble, for in his days no man durst trust other, ne open his courage to his neighbour, for that time each man appeached other of treason, to the intent that he might have his good. And they that were not of power to overcome their neighbours, turned unto the Danes against their own neighbours, and so, by the help of the Danes, they fulfilled their cursed purpose, and so there was much extortion, and much people slain in divers places, in houses, fields and ways, that the people unnethe durst bury them. Also in that time was great tyranny, murder, oppressing of women, as wives, widows, and maidens against their wills. And in this persecution Englishmen were nigh destroyed, and great desolation was in holy church, for monasteries, churches, and houses of religion were burnt and destroyed, which caused many to flee into wilderness, among whom the good bishop of Winchester, Brightwold, fled into the abbey of Glastonbury, where he daily prayed unto Almighty God for peace of this realm of England.

Our blessed Lord, seeing his meekness, showed to him a vision by which he was greatly comforted. For in a night, as he was in his oratory, he fell in a sweet slumber, and saw the glorious apostle Saint Peter with bright shining clothes appearing in a high place of dignity, and with him a seemly young man richly arrayed in clothing of a king, whom Saint Peter did consecrate and anoint into a king, and commending his chastity greatly, and his clean living. And it was showed to this bishop many years tofore, that this Edward should reign in this land, and the bishop, being abashed of this vision, desired of Saint Peter to know the vision thereof, to whom Saint Peter said the estate of this realm, and told that the fury and woodness of the Danes should cease soon after, and said that all this punishment was for the sins of the people, and God should purvey for a peaceable king, which shall finish all the woodness of his enemies the Danes. In whose time shall be plenty of peace, both to the church and to the land, and great abundance of corn and fruit. And this realm shall be prosperous in all things, and the people shall be of such conditions that other lands shall both love and dread them. The king’s name shall be Edward, which shall rule all manner things to the pleasing of God, and shall end his life in the love of our Lord graciously. And when this holy bishop awoke, he kneeled down and made his prayers with shedding of tears, and though that peace was not yet reformed, nevertheless he thanked Almighty God that he was certain that, by God’s grace, he should see it in his days, wherefore he went about and preached to the people for to do penance, and our Lord should show to us mercy, and give to us peace and all things plenteous. And in this war was the king slain by treason, and he was buried at Glastonbury. Then both his sons were brought to King Canute the Dane, to do with them what he would, and when he saw them he might not for pity slay them, but sent them over the sea to be slain there, so that he might reign in England peaceably when the rightful blood was destroyed. Notwithstanding, they were preserved and kept alive, and were conveyed to the emperor of Rome, the which kept them till Saint Edward was made king of England, and then he married the oldest of them to a cousin of his, because of the love that they had to King Edward, which was uncle to them. Then had King Canute the rule of England by strong hand, all law and good rule set aside. For in his days was full much trouble and robbery with other great oppressions and importable charges among the commonalty. For he dreaded no man except the two sons of the king, that were then with the emperor, wherefor his council would that he should wed the mother of them named Emma, to make the more alliance between them. And soon after, Alfred came to England for to speak with his mother, and anon as he was come over the sea into this land Earl Godwin came and welcomed him, and anon after slew him by treason, ere he came to the presence of his mother. For whose death Saint Edward made great sorrow. And while this holy child Saint Edward was in Normandy, he used a full good life, haunting ofttimes holy church, and loved and conversed many times with the company of holy religious men, and especially among holy monks. And used to pray and say in this manner: O good Lord, I have none help but thee only, my friends be gone from me, and they be become mine adversaries. My father is dead and my brethren be slain, my mother is wedded to my most enemy, and I am left alone, and daily they seek the means to slay me, but to thee, Lord, I am left poor. I beseech thee, Lord, to help me that am a fatherless child, for thou sometime helpedst marvellously Edwin and Oswald, which were exiled and ordained for to die. Thou defendedst them not only from death, but also thou, Lord, restoredst them again to their own kingdoms. O good Lord, I beseech thee and pray thee to keep me safe, and bring me into the kingdom of my father. Thou shalt be my God, and Saint Peter the apostle my patron, the relics of whom, by the grace of God, I purpose to visit and to honour in the same place where they now rest, if thou, Lord, send to me life, health, opportunity and space.

And when King Canute had reigned in England twenty years, having two sons by the said Emma, that is to wit, Harold and Hardicanute, he died, and when his first son had reigned four years, he exiled his own mother, and died soon after. And after him reigned his brother a little time, and died also, as our Lord had ordained, and then was England delivered from the grievous tribute and thraldom of the Danes. And then the lords and the commons of England remembered the oath that they made in the parliament, which sware that Edward, which was then in his mother’s womb, should be their king, and anon sent into Normandy for this holy child Edward. And the lords and the commons received him with great gladness, and then the archbishop of Canterbury and the archbishop of York, with other bishops, did consecrate him, anointed and crowned him king of England. O good Lord! what joy and gladness was then in England. For when the old felicity of this land was almost despaired, then it was kindled again by the coming of this blessed king Saint Edward. Then had the commons rest and peace, and the lords and gentlemen rest and honour, and then holy church received all her liberties again. Then was the sun lifted up, and the moon set in his order, that is to say, priests shined in wisdom and in holiness. The monasteries flourished in devotion by holy religion. The clerks gave light and prospered in their offices to the pleasure of God. The common people were content and were joyful in their degree, and in this king’s days there was no venom that might then corrupt the earth with pestilence, and in the sea none outrageous tempests, and the land plenteous of all manner of fruits; and in the clergy nothing inordinate; and among the common people was no grudging. And the renomee and fame of this holy king Saint Edward sprang so marvellously about to other nations, in such wise that all christian kings desired to have peace with him. The king of France, which was nigh of his kin, made with him a general peace, so that it might be said of him as it was said of Solomon: All the kings of the earth desired to see his face, and to hear his wisdom; except only Denmark, which yet conspired against this realm of England. And what fell thereof, it shall be declared hereafter more openly, for this holy king Edward was ever full of meekness and of virtue, and never lifted up by vain glory, but ever he remembered the words of our Lord that saith: I have set thee prince of the people, but be not therefore lifted up in vain glory, but be thou among them as one of them.

He was among his household men equal and familiar, among priests meek and debonair, to his people amiable and cheerful, to wretches and needy men full of compassion and large of almsgiving. He was also much devout in the service of God, and diligent to repair and re-edify churches that were destroyed by the Danes. And in judgment full discreet, considering no man’s person, but only the weight of his cause, as well to the rich as to the poor, and he had riches enough, and his treasure seemed common to all poor men. His words were sad and discreet and meddled with mirth, speaking oft of Jesu Christ the second person in the Trinity, and of our blessed Lady his mother. And sometime he spake sharply, as he saw need, correcting trespassers, gentle and sweet to good men. He was never elate, ne enhanced in pride, ne dishonest by gluttony. He would not be compelled by wrath, ne incline for gift.

He despised riches, and was never sorry for loss of worldly goods and riches, ne the more glad for winning thereof, in such wise that all men marvelled of the sadness of him. And about the king were divers covetous men, which said to the king how his treasure wasted fast, and if the Danes came again he had not wherewith to defend him. Wherefore they counselled him to raise an aid among his commons, like as King Canute had done divers times. An aid was then except the danegeld, and they counselled to do in like wise. And he said: Nay, and he would not agree thereto, notwithstanding they daily cried upon him. And when he saw them so importunate and showed so great perils, then at the last he said to them to prove them, Let us see how ye will do. And when they heard that of his own mouth they were right glad, and sent out commissions for to gather it, and spared no country, but made them pay in the largest wise. And when this money was levied and brought in to the king’s treasury, then they brought the king thither for to see it. The king then standing afar from it, saw the devil in likeness of an ape, sitting upon the treasure, and said: What have ye done? and what money have ye brought to me? Forsooth, there shall not one penny be spent to my use, but I charge you for to deliver to each man his money again, but thereto they were much loth, and said that they might spend it in deeds of charity. Then the king said: God forbid that I should spend the goods of other men, for what alms should I make with the goods of poor commons and labourers ? See ye not how the devil sitteth upon the heap of money, and maketh great joy that he hath taken us in his snare? Wherefore I charge you on pain of death that ye deliver this money again there as ye had it, every penny. Then they obeyed the king, and repaid it unto them of whom they had received it, and durst never after move the king to such matters, ne in none other like, so that all the days of Saint Edward was neither task ne taillage levied among his commons, which was a great joy to the realm.

In a time the king was sick, lying in his bed, and there stood in his chamber a chest open, full of gold and silver, and a clerk came in, supposing the king had slept, and took out of it a certain sum of money, and went his way. And soon after he came again and would have taken more; then the king said: Forsooth, now thou art unwise to come again, for thou hadst sufficiently enough tofore, therefore beware, for if the treasurer come and find thee thou art like to die therefor, wherefore if thou love thy life flee fast away with that thou hast. And anon after came the treasurer and found how of the treasure was borne away a great part, and sought and enquired diligently for the thief that stole it. And the king seeing the great trouble and sorrow of the treasurer demanded him the cause of his heaviness. And when he had told it to the king, the king said to him: Sorrow no more, for peradventure he that hath it hath more need to it than we, and so the thief escaped and was not pursued.

After, when all things were quiet in the realm, the council of the land assembled for to treat for a marriage for the king, at which thing, when it was moved, he was greatly abashed, dreading to lose the treasure of his virginity, which was kept in a frail and brittle vessel; and what he should do or say he wist not. For, if he should obstinately deny it, he dreaded lest his vow of chastity should be openly known, and if he consented thereto he dreaded to lose his chastity, wherefore he commended himself only to God, saying these words: O good Lord, thou deliveredst sometime three children from the flame of fire in the chimney and furnace of the Chaldees, and, by the Lord, Joseph escaped with his chastity from the wife of Potiphar, she holding his mantle, and yet by thy mercy he escaped, and, good Lord, by thy virtue Susanna was delivered from the death to the which the old unchaste priests had damned her to; and by thy might, Lord, Judith escaped when she had slain Holofernes, and reserved her from defouling, and escaped without hurt; and above all other thou hast preserved thy blessed mother, most best and sweetest lady, she being both wife and virgin; then behold on me thy servant, and son of thine handmaid, that I am in great dread. I lift up my heart to thee, beseeching thee that art my Lord, and thy mother, my sweetest Lady, to help me now in this most need, that I may so receive the sacrament of wedlock that I fall not in peril of my chastity. And with this condition in his heart, he consented to matrimony.

Then was all the council right glad, and searched for a virgin that were according to his estate. And among all the virgins of the land Edith, daughter of Earl Godwin, was found most according to him by her virtuous conditions. And her father made great means to the king’s council for to accomplish this marriage, by which he might come in the king’s conceit. And by his wisdom, for his great might and power, he had his intent. And when the marriage was solemnised and accomplished by the holy sacrament, he and the queen vowed to live together chaste secretly, that no man knew it but God alone. There was between them a loving spousehood without bodily knowing of deed, chaste embracing without defloration of virginity. There was between them verily chaste love, without fleshly touching and knowing. Afterward, some of the realm grudged, saying he had taken a wife by compulsion against his will of an unkind lineage, and would not know his wife because he would not bring forth more tyrants. And thus none knew the very truth of his chaste life whilst he lived, but the very cleanness of his mind was sufficient witness of his chastity.

It happened on a Whitsunday, as the king was crowned at Westminster in his estate, and kneeling, made his prayers devoutly for the tranquillity and peace of his land before the altar of the blessed Trinity, at the elevation of the blessed sacrament he fell in a soft and demure laughing, so that the lords that were there present awaiting on him marvelled greatly, but durst say nothing to him till the service was done. Then one, that was hardier than another, demanded of him the cause of his laughing, and then he told to him how the Danes had assembled in great power of people against the realm of England, and were entering into their ships; and as the king of Denmark would have entered into the ship, suddenly his strength was taken from him, and so fell into the sea between two ships and was drowned, by whose death the people of Denmark, and also of England, were delivered from sin and peril. They, hearing this, marvelled greatly, and sent into Denmark to know the truth. And when the messengers returned, they reported that it was true as the king had said, and that the king of Denmark was drowned that same time that Saint Edward laughed.

After this, the noble Saint Edward remembered his vow and promise to visit Saint Peter at Rome, which he made in Normandy, wherefore he let call his commons and his lords to a council tofore him, whereof he communed with them how and in what manner he might depart, and of the governance of the realm in his absence, what people should be convenient for to accompany him, and what money should suffice him and his meiny. And when the lords and commons heard this, they were full heavy and sorrowful that he should depart from them, and he seeing their heaviness comforted them, and said how that our Lord had sent to them peace, and by his good grace should continue the same in his absence. Yet, notwithstanding, the people required him to send unto the pope to be assoiled of his vow, or else delay it till another time. And the king, seeing the sorrow and lamentation of his people, which wept and wrung their hands, and as people amazed without a defender and keeper, comforted them and granted to abide still with them, and ordained certain bishops for to go to Rome and to ask of our holy father counsel, how he might be assoiled of this avow that he had made to visit Saint Peter. And the archbishop of York, and bishop of Winchester, and two abbots, with divers clerks and laymen, went to Rome, and when they came to Rome, the pope had made that time a great congregation of clerks of divers great matters belonging to holy church, and when the pope wist of their coming, he was right glad and sent for them, and the pope bade them tell the cause of their coming. And anon, silence was made, and they exposed the cause of their coming, and recited the avow and the desire of King Edward, the peril of the realm, the trouble, the dread of the people, the breaking of the peace, the clamour of the poor commons, the jeopardy of the king in his absence, and the piteous destruction which the Danes had late made by their cruelty; and also declared the great devotion he had to visit the holy apostles Peter and Paul. Then the pope and the clergy marvelled greatly, and gave laud and praising unto Almighty God that he had sent so devout and virtuous a prince in the angle of the world to maintain by his wisdom the christian faith, and how dreadful he was to offend against the holy church. And when the pope understood how his people loved him, and how sorrowful they would be of his departing, he marvelled greatly, and thought verily that he was greatly beloved of God and was with him in all his works, for he saw in him the meekness of David, the chastity of Joseph, and the riches of Solomon, and yet he set nought thereby. Then the pope, considering the great perils that might ensue by his departing, dispensed with him, and assoiled him of his avow, of which he sent to him a bull under lead, and enjoined him in penance to give the goods that he should have spent in his pilgrimage, to deeds of charity, and to re-edify some church of Saint Peter, and endow it with sufficient livelihood. And then the messengers received the pope’s blessing, and returned into England, and came unto the king at Westminster. And when the king understood how he was assoiled of his avow, and how they had sped, he was glad, and thanked Almighty God and our holy father the pope.

There was a holy man, a recluse in the diocese of Worcester, which knew nothing of the council assembled upon the governance of the land, ne of the avow of the king, ne of the message sent to Rome, to whom Saint Peter appeared in a night, and said to him how King Edward had sent to Rome to be assoiled of the avow that he made when he was beyond the sea, and he hath great conscience because his council would not suffer him to accompany it in going in his proper person to Rome, wherefore thou shalt write to him in my name and give him knowledge that he is assoiled by mine authority from the bond of his avow, and how he shall have, in commandment of the pope for his penance, to give such goods as he hath ordained for his expenses, to poor men, and to make a new abbey in the honour of Saint Peter, or to repair an old one, and to endow it sufficiently, and write to him that, by the same token that he chose me sometime to be his patron in Normandy, that he repair the abbey called Thorney in the west of the city of London, which sometime I hallowed myself. And let him set therein monks of good conversation, for from that place shall be a ladder stretching in to heaven, and angels descending and ascending, bearing up to heaven to our Lord the prayers of meek and devout men. And to him that ascendeth by that ladder, I shall open the gates of heaven, like as our Lord hath enjoined me by mine office, and I shall loose them that be bound, and receive them that be unbound. All this that thou hast herd of me, thou shalt write it, and send it to King Edward, which then was many a mile thence. And the messenger that came from this anker or recluse came to the presence of the king the same time that the bishops came from Rome. And when the king had received the letters that came from Rome with great reverence and read them, he thanked God that he was so clearly released of the bond of his avow. And then he commanded the letters of the recluse to be read. And when they were read, and he saw they were according to the letters that came from Rome, he humbly thanked God and Saint Peter his patron, and incontinent disposed him to fulfil his penance, and began to repair the abbey that he was assigned to repair by the glorious apostle Saint Peter, and gave largely alms to poor people, and franchised all England of the tribute that was used yearly to be paid to the Danes for evermore.

On a time when King Edward was at Westminster, there came to him a cripple, born in Ireland, which was named Giles Michell. And this cripple had no feet, but went upon his hands and knees, having in either hand a little stool to go with. His legs were both bent backward and cleaved to his thighs, and his toes grew fast to his buttocks. This cripple entered boldly into the king’s palace, and came to the king’s chamber door. And one Hulin, the king’s chamberlain, demanded him sharply what he did there. To whom the cripple said: Let me not, I pray you, for I must needs speak to the king, for I have been out of this land six times to visit the holy relics of the holy apostle Saint Peter, to the intent to be healed, and Saint Peter denied me not, but bade me go into England and let the king bear me on his back into the church of Saint Peter, and then I shall be made perfectly whole. Which thing was told to the king by the same Hulin, and anon the king had pity on the poor man, and disdained not, but took him on his shoulders and bare him, whom the cripple beclipped with his foul and scabby hands and arms, and so, in the bearing, his sinews loosed and were reached out. And of kernels and botches of his face, and of scurvies, there ran great plenty of blood and matter on the king’s clothes, which was told to the king, and also that he was all whole, but the king took none heed thereto, but bare him to the high altar, and there he was set down on his feet, and was made perfectly whole to ride or go whither he would, but the king would in no wise have this miracle ascribed to him, but gave to him a reward and bade him to go to Rome and thank God and his holy apostle Saint Peter.

In that time King Ethelbert, which reigned in Kent, and Sigbert in Middlesex, were converted to the faith of Christ by Saint Austin. Which Ethelbert made in London, within the city, a noble and royal church in the honour of Saint Paul, in which Saint Austin ordained Saint Mellitus to be bishop of that city. Which king was not satisfied with that good deed, but thought and also did do make another church in the west end of the city, which then was called Thorney, and now is named Westminster, which church he prayed Mellitus for to hailow in the honour of Saint Peter, and the night before that he had purposed to hallow it, Saint Peter appeared to a fisher in Thames, and bade him set him over from Stangate to Westminster, and he prayed the fisher to abide him there till he came again, and he would well reward him for his labour. And soon after the fisher saw Saint Peter enter into the church with a great light, which light endured as long as he was in the church. And a certain space after, he returned to the fisher asking him if he had any meat to eat, and the fisher was so greatly abashed of the light that issued out of the church with him, that he durst not speak to him. To whom Saint Peter said: Brotber, dread thee not, I am a man as thou art; hast thou any fish? And he said: Nay, for I have awaited on you all this night while ye have been in the church. And then they entered into the boat, and Saint Peter commanded him to cast out his net. And when he had so done, there came so great a multitude of great fishes into his net, that unnethe they might draw up the net for breaking. And when they were come to land Saint Peter divided the fishes, and bade the fisher bear the greatest unto Mellitus, bishop of London, and deliver it to him, and tell to him that I have hallowed the church of Westminster this night, and say to him that he say mass therein to-morrow, and if he will not believe it, say to him, when he cometh he shall find there tokens sufficient, and I shall be patron of that church, and visit it ofttimes, and bear in the sight of Almighty God the prayers and devotions of true christian people that pray in that place, and take thou the remnant of the fish for thy labour. And this said, Saint Peter vanished away. Then the fisher marvelled greatly of the sight that he had seen, and early by the morrow he went to the bishop Mellitus, of London, and delivered to him the fish that Saint Peter had sent to him, and told to him, by order, like as Saint Peter had given him charge, and as ye have heard tofore. But the bishop would not believe him till he came to Westminster and saw the tokens for to put him out of doubt. And when he had opened the church door he found a cross made of sand from that one side of the church unto that other, with a. b. c. Ietters of grewe, and he found also twelve crosses made on the walls in divers places of the church, and the ends of twelve candles almost burnt out, and also he saw the places that were anointed with holy oil, which were yet moist and appeared newly done. Then the bishop believed this thing verily, and said mass that same day in the church, and there preached to the people a glorious sermon, and declared the great miracle openly. Wherefore the people gave laud and praisings to God and to his glorious apostle Saint Peter. And then Saint Edward understood that this church was of old time hallowed by Saint Peter, and how Saint Peter had commanded him to repair the same church, as the letter of the recluse maketh mention. So then ever after he had full great devotion to the same place. And he did do cast down the old work, and did do build it up new, and endowed that monastery worshipfully with livelihood and jewels. And at that time pope Leo was dead and pope Nicholas was after him. And then the king, to give relation to him of his penance, enjoined by Leo his predecessor, to re-edify a monastery of the glorious apostle Saint Peter, and sent Alfred, the archbishop of York, to Rome with other clerks to inform the pope that he had accomplished his penance, that is to wit, both distributed his goods to poor men, and also repaired a monastery of Saint Peter, and how he had by revelation what place he should repair, praying him to ratify and confirm the same, which pope Leo had done tofore him. Then pope Nicholas, considering the great devotion and true intent of this christian king, Saint Edward, confirmed the bull of absolution, and ratified the foundation and the statutes of the monastery, and gave thereto great and large privileges, that whosoever presumed to take away any movable or immovable goods, or would take any man by force or strength out of that church or of the precinct of the same, should be accursed by the authority of Peter and Paul to be damned with Judas, in hell everlastingly to lie in pain. Then the messengers returned again from Rome with letters of confirmation. And when the king saw the great benevolence of our holy father the pope, and his favour and gentleness, giving to him, by writing, more privileges and freedom than he desired, then he was full of gladness and joy, and thanked Almighty God of all his gifts.

On a time when the king was in the church of Saint Peter at Westminster, and was disposed in great devotion, as his custom was, to hear mass, Earl Leofric kneeled behind the king and saw with his bodily eyes our Lord Jesu Christ between the priest‘s hands, appearing in the likeness of a glorious child or beauteous person, which blessed the king with his right hand. And the king, which was greatly comforted with the sight, bowed down his head, and with great devotion and meekness received the blessing of our Lord. Then the earl arose to tell the king, supposing that the king had not seen it, but he knew the earl’s intent and bade him stand still, for that thou seest I see, and him I honour. And when mass was done they talked together of their vision, and they were marvellously refreshed with the gifts of the Holy Ghost, and might not well speak for joy and weeping. Then the king commanded Leofric that this vision should never be uttered ne openly known till the time that they should die. And when Leofric should depart hence, he told it in confession to his ghostly father, and made it to be written, and that writing was laid in a chest among other relics. And many years after, when they were both dead, the writing was found and read. And then the holiness of the king was known, and his meekness showed, which would not it should be showed by their life for vain glory.

There was a young woman given in marriage to a noble man, and not long after she had twain misfortunes. First she was barren, and also there arose under her cheek many foul botches and kernels full of corrupt humours, which engendered foul worms, and made her flesh to stink, so that she was abominable and hateful to her husband, and to all her friends. And when she could not be healed by no medicine, then she put all her hope and trust in Almighty God, and with many a bitter tear, both day and night besought and prayed him to deliver her from that reproof and disease, or else to take her out of this world. And when she had thus long continued in prayer, she was commanded by a voice in her sleep that she should go to the holy King Edward, and if he would wash her face with his hands, she should be all whole. And when she awoke she avowed to seek the king in his palace, and then she came thither, and made means that the king might have knowledge of her dream. And when the king understood it, he called her to him and said: If God will that I should wash thy face, I will not refuse it, and called after water, and with his own hands he washed her face, and wrung out the worms and all the foul blood out of her face, and bade her tarry there three or four days till the skin might cover again her visage, and thank thou God for thy deliverance. And when she was made perfectly whole, and her visage fair and beauteous, then she fell down at the king’s feet. and thanked him humbly of her deliverance, but he forbade her for to give any praising to him therefor, but bade her to give laud and praising to God therefor, for he is the doer, not I. Then she prayed the king that he would pray to God for her that she might have a child by her husband, for she had been long barren. And the king promised her so to do. And then she returned joyously home to her husband, and soon after conceived and had a child, whereof she thanked God that she was healed of both her diseases.

Saint Paul writeth that the Holy Ghost giveth graces diversely; to some he giveth wisdom, to some conning, and to some grace to heal and to cure sick people. But this blessed king Saint Edward had a special grace above others in giving sight to blind men. There was a blind man well known, which heard a voice in his sleep, that if he might have of the water that the king washed his hands in, and wash his eyes therewith, he should have his sight again. Then the next day after, this blind man went in to the king’s palace, and told his vision to the king’s chamberlain, and the chamberlain told it to the king. Then the king said that it might be well an illusion or a dream which is not always true, for it hath not been seen that foul water of a sinner’s hands should give sight to blind men. Then said the chamberlain that many times dreams have been found true, as the dreams of Joseph, Pharaoh, Daniel, and many others. Then the king in great humility went into the church on a solemn day with a basin of water, and commanded the blind man to be brought to him. And as the king washed the face of the blind man, his eyes were opened and he had his sight, and stood all abashed looking on the people, as he had newly come into this world. And then the people wept for joy to see the holiness of the king. And then he was demanded if he might see clearly, and he said: Yea, forsooth, and the king kneeled down before the altar saying this verse with great dread and meekness: Non nobis domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam, that is to say: Not to us, Lord, not to us, but unto thy name be given glory.

After this, the holiness and fame of Saint Edward sprang about so that, a citizen of Lincoln, which had been blind three years, came to the king’s palace to have of the water that the king had washed his hands in, for he believed that it would heal him. And as he had gotten of that water by one of the king’s officers, he washed his face and eyes therewith, and anon he was restored to his sight and was perfectly made whole, and so joyfully returned home, magnifying God and Saint Edward that he had his sight again.

In a time there were gathered together certain workman to hew down trees to the King’s palace at Bruham. And after their labour, they laid them down to sleep in the shadow, and a young man of that fellowship that hight Wilwin, when he should rise, he opened his eyes and might not see. He washed his face and rubbed his eyes, but he might nothing see, wherefore he was full of heaviness. Then one of his fellows led him home to his house and he abode so blind eighteen years. And at the last, a worshipful woman came to visit and comfort him. And when she knew how he was made blind, she bade him be of good cheer, and said if he would visit sixty churches with good devotion, and then to have the water that the king had washed his hands in and wash his eyes withal, he should have his sight again. Then he was greatly comforted, and gat him a guide, and went and visited three score churches with great devotion, and came to the king’s palace and cried for help, and they that heard him bade him cease of his crying, but for all that he cried more and more. And when the king understood it, he called him to him and said: Why should I not set my hands to help this poor man, though I be unworthy, if it please God to relieve him and to give to him his sight? And because he would not be found disobedient to God ne presumptuous, he took water and washed his eyes full meekly, and anon he was restored to his sight, and saw as clearly as ever he did.

Also there was a fair miracle of three blind men, and the fourth had but one eye, which came to the king’s palace, and then came one of the king’s servants, which had pity on them, and he gat of the water that the king had washed his hands in when he had healed that other blind man, and he brought this water to the gate, and told these four men how the king a little before had healed a blind man with the same water, and said to them, if they would wash their eyes with good devotion, they might be healed by God’s grace with the same water. And then they kneeled down with great devotion and prayed this man to wash their eyes therewith. And then he made a cross with the water upon each of their eyes, and besought Almighty God to open their eyes, and they all there received their perfect sight, and returned in giving laud and praising God of their sight given to them by the merits of Saint Edward.

As the king on a time sat at the table with the queen and her father Earl Godwin, and saw how Harold and Tosti, the two sons of Godwin, played tofore the king, but at the last the game turned into earnest, and they began to fight. And Harold took his brother by the hair, and threw him to the earth and fell upon him in great anger, and would have strangled him but if he had been let. Then the king demanded Godwin if he understood anything thereby, and he said: Nay, forsooth. Then the king said: Ye shall see when they come to man’s age that, one of them shall slay that other if he can. And Harold, which is the stronger, shall put that other out of his land. Then shall his brother Tosti come again with the king of Norway, and hold a battle against Harold his brother in England, in the which both the king of Norway and Tosti shall be slain, and all their host save a few that shall escape. And the same Harold shall give himself to penance for the death of his brother and so escape, or else he shall be put out of his kingdom and die wretchedly. The king was many time moved and displeased with Godwin, for he misused the king’s power, and attempted the king in many things that were unlawful. And in all that he might, he laboured to bring out of conceit, the king’s cousins and friends that came to him out of Normandy, to the intent that he might have all the rule about the king as well secretly as outward. And the king, understanding his falseness, said but little. But in a time, as the king sat at his dinner with divers lords and gentles about him, one of his servants was almost overthrown as he smote that one foot with that other, and yet the sadder foot saved all, and kept him on his feet; which thing gave occasion to the king to talk to his lords, and the two feet were likened to two brethren, that if one were overcharged that other should help and succour him. Then said the king: So might my brother have been a help to me, and a supporter in time of need, if he had not been betrayed of Godwin. Then Godwin, hearing these words of the king’s mouth, was sore afeard, and said: Sire, ye deem that I should betray your brother? I pray God that this morsel of bread may choke me if I consented to his death. Then the king blessed the bread, and bade him eat it, and the morsel abode in his throat and choked him, so that his breath was stopped, and so died wretchedly. Then the king said: Draw the traitor out of my presence, for now his treason and falsehood appeareth.

On Easter-day when he had received our Lord, and was set at his dinner, in the middle of it, when all was silence, he fell into a smiling, and after into a sadness, wherefore all that were there marvelled greatly, but none durst ask of him what he meant. But after dinner duke Harold followed him into his chamber with a bishop and an abbot that were of his privy council, and demanded of him the cause of that thing. Then the king said: When I remembered at my dinner the great benefits of worship and dignity of meats, of drinks, of servants, of array, and of all riches and royalty that I stood in at that time, and I referred all that worship to Almighty God, as my custom is, then our Lord opened mine eyes, and I saw the seven sleepers Iying in a cave in the Mount Celion beside the city of Ephesus, in the same form and manner as though I had been by them. And I smiled when I saw them turn them from the right side to the left side, but when I understood what is signified by the said turning, I had no cause to laugh but rather to mourn. The turning signifieth that the prophecy be fulfilled that saith: Surget gens contra gentem, that is to say, people shall arise against people, and a kingdom against another. They have lain many years upon their right side, and they shall lie yet on their left side seventy years, in which times will be great battles, great pestilence, and great murrain, great earthquaves, great hunger and great dearth through all the world. Of which saying of the king they greatly marvelled, and anon they sent to the emperor to know if there were any such city or hill in his land in which such seven men should sleep. Then the emperor, marvelling, sent to the same hill and there found the cave and the seven martyrs sleeping as they had been dead, Iying on the left side every one. And then the emperor was greatly abashed of that sight, and commended greatly the holiness of Saint Edward, the king of England, which had the spirit of prophecy. For after his death began great insurrections through all the world. For the paynims destroyed a great part of Syria, and threw down both monasteries and churches, and what by pestilence and stroke of sword, streets, fields, and towns lay full of dead men. The prince of Greece was slain, the emperor of Rome was slain, the king of England and the king of France were slain, and all the other realms of the world were greatly troubled with divers diseases.

When the blessed King Edward had lived many years, and was fallen into great age, it happed he came riding by a church in Essex called Havering which was at that time in hallowing and should be dedicated in the honour of our Lord and Saint John the Evangelist; wherefore the king for great devotion lighted down and tarried while the church was in hallowing. And in the time of procession, a fair old man came to the king and demanded of him alms in the worship of God and Saint John the Evangelist. Then the king found nothing ready to give, ne his almoner was not present, but he took off the ring from his finger and gave it to the poor man, whom the poor man thanked and departed. And within certain years after, two pilgrims of England went into the holy land to visit holy places there, and as they had lost their way and were gone from their fellowship, and the night approached, and they sorrowed greatly as they that wist not whither to go, and dreaded sore to be perished among wild beasts; at the last they saw a fair company of men arrayed in white clothing, with two lights borne afore them, and behind them there came a fair ancient man with white hair for age. Then these pilgrims thought to follow the light and drew nigh. Then the old man asked them what they were, and of what region, and they answered that they were pilgrims of England, and had lost their fellowship and way also. Then this old man comforted them goodly, and brought them into a fair city where was a fair cenacle honestly arrayed with all manner of dainties, and when they had well refreshed them and rested there all night, on the morn this fair old man went with them, and brought them in the right way again. And he was glad to hear them talk of the welfare and holiness of their king Saint Edward. And when he should depart from them, then he told them what he was, and said: I am John the Evangelist, and say ye unto Edward your king that I greet him right well, by the token that he gave to me this ring with his own hands at the hallowing of my church, which ring ye shall deliver to him again. And say ye to him that he dispose his goods, for within six months he shall be in the joy of heaven with me, where he shall have his reward for his chastity and for his good living. And dread ye not, for ye shall speed right well in your journey, and ye shall come home in short time safe and sound. And when he had delivered to them the ring he departed from them suddenly. And soon after they came home and did their message to the king, and delivered to him the ring, and said that Saint John Evangelist sent it to him.

And as soon as he heard that name he was full of joy, and for gladness let fall tears from his eyes, giving laud and thanksgiving to Almighty God, and to Saint John his avowry that he would vouchsafe to let him have knowledge of his departing out of this world. Also he had another token of Saint John, and that was that the two pilgrims should die tofore him, which thing was proved true, for they lived not long after. And at the feast of Christmas the king was sick, and on the day of the Innocents he heard mass in the new church of Westminster, which he had re-edified, and then he, giving thankings unto Almighty God, returned into his chamber sore sick, there abiding the mercy of our Lord. And all the lords, gentles, and commons were in great heaviness when they understood that the king might not live, remembering what wealth and prosperity the land had been in during his days, and what jeopardy it was like to stand in after his decease. Then all things were committed to the queen whom he loved specially, and she full diligently ministered to him all things necessary. And when he was so feeble by sickness that his natural heat was almost gone, he lay nigh two days in a trance, as a man that had been ravished, and when he came to himself again they that were about him marvelled greatly, for they weened verily that he should no more have spoken. Notwithstanding, after, he spake with a noble spirit these words: O thou merciful Lord God, that art infinite Almighty, in whose power all things be put, which changest realms and empires, if those things be true that thou hast showed to me, so grant me space and strength to declare them to my people, that if peradventure they give them to penance, they may have grace and forgiveness. Then Almighty God gave to him a new strength that passeth all man’s reason, and that might not be without miracle, for before that time he spake so soft that for feebleness he might not well be heard, and at that time he spake with a whole breast, these words following: When I was young and dwelled in Normandy, I loved well the fellowship of good men, for he that spake most religiously and goodly, with him was I most conversant. And among all others there were twain to whom I drew much for their honest conversation, and for the holiness of their life, sweetness of their manners and their comfortable words, whom I saw translated into heaven; for many years gone they died, and now they have appeared to me by the sufferance of God and have showed to me the state of my people, and what sins reign among them, and what vengeance shall be taken on them for their sins. priests have offended, for they minister the holy sacraments with unclean thoughts and polluted hands, and as an hired man and not as a very shepherd, defend not their sheep ne feed them. And as for princes and gentles, they be found false and untrue, and fellows to fiends, thieves, and robbers of the country, which have no dread of God ne honour him. And true law is a burden to them, and had in despite, and cruelness much used. And the prelates keep not righteousness, they correct not their subjects, ne teach ne inform them as they should do. And therefore our Lord hath now drawn out his sword of vengeance to smite his people. This punishment shall begin within this year both by sword and wasting this realm piteously. And then I began to sigh and mourn for the trouble that was coming to my people, and said: If they would be turned and do penance, shall not they have forgiveness and God shall bless them again ? And it was answered to me: The hearts of the people be so indurate and so blinded, and their ears so stopped, that they will not hear of no correction, ne they be not moved ne provoked by no benefits that our Lord giveth them. Then I asked if there were any remedy that might attemper the wrath of our Lord. To whom it was answered in these words: A green tree cut from his stock shall be divided from his proper root the space of three furlongs, and without man’s hand shall turn again to his old root, and take again his sap and flourisheth and bringeth forth fruit, and when this is done there may come remedy. And when this was said they were suddenly gone out of my sight.

There was about the king that time, the queen, duke Harold her brother, Robert, keeper of the palace, and Stigand, which had defiled his father’s bed. For whiles Robert, the archbishop of Canterbury lived, the said Stigand put him down and came in by simony, wherefore he was suspended by the pope. And afterward God took vengeance upon him, so that his belly brake and his bowels fell out, and so he died wretchedly. This Stigand gave no credence to the king’s words, but ascribed it to his age, and to the feebleness of the king, and made it but a fantasy, but others that were better advised, wept and sorrowed and wrung their hands, and sent to our holy father the pope, giving him information of the same vision. And our holy father wrote epistles to England exhorting the people to do penance, but his writing profited not. But when king Harold had broken the oath that he had made to duke William, therefor he was slain in battle, then they knew well that the prophecy af Saint Edward was come. For then the liberty of England made an end, and then came in bondship and thraldom. That time England was all changed, and I understand Saint Dunstan prophesied the same trouble coming, and after a certain time he promised comfort also. Wherefore this foresaid vision may be conveniently expounded as here followeth. The tree signifieth the realm of England, whose greatness and fairness betokeneth riches plenteous, and honour of England, of whom all worship proceedeth which worship hath proceeded of the true blood of the land, and of the true lineage which descended from Alfred, which our holy father the pope crowned and anointed king, as for the first king of the true line of England, unto this holy king Edward, by succession. The tree is cut down from the stock when the realm is divided and translated from one seed or lineage to another. The space of three furlongs is the time of three kings, that is to say Harold, William Conqueror, and William his son. The coming again of the tree to the stock without man’s help was when king Henry the first came into the realm, not by man’s strength but by the very true love of his commons. He took his sap and his very strength when he wedded Maud the daughter of the niece of Saint Edward, joining together the seed of England and of Normandy, and by the tree flourished, whom Maud the empress sprang of their seed, and it brought forth fruit when of her came Henry the second, and thus these two people were joined together. If this exposition displease any man, let him expound it better, or else let him abide a time till it be fulfilled, so that the prophecy of king Edward accord to the prophecy of Saint Dunstan.

This holy king Saint Edward, knowing that his hour drew nigh, spake to them that stood weeping about him and in comforting them said: Forsooth if ye loved me ye would pray that I should pass from this world to the father of heaven, there to receive the joy which is promised to all true christian men. Put ye away your weeping and speed forth my journey with prayers, with holy psalms and with almsdeeds. For though mine enemy the fiend may not overcome me in my faith, yet there is none found so perfect but he will assay and tempt to let or to fear him. And then he commended the queen to her brother in commending her virtues unto his lords, and declared to them their pure chastity. For she was to him in open places as his wife, and in secret places as his sister. And he commanded also that her dowry should be made sure to her, and they that came with him out of Normandy should be put to their choice, whether they should abide still in England and to be endowed with livelihood after their degree, or else to return again into Normandy with a sufficient reward. And he chose his place for his sepulture in the church of Saint Peter, which he had new builded, and said he should not long abide in this world. And when he beheld the queen and saw her weep and sigh among, he said to her ofttimes: My daughter, weep not, for I shall not die, but I shall live, and shall depart from the land of death, and believe to see the goodness of God in the land of life. And then he set his mind all in God, and gave himself wholly to the faith of the church, in the hope and promises of Christ under the sacraments of the church. And among these words of praising, he yielded up his spirit unto God, in the year of our Lord one thousand and sixty-six, when he had reigned in this land twenty-three years and six months and twenty-seven days, the fourth day of January. And as his cousins and his lovers stood about this holy body when the spirit was passed, they saw a marvellous beauty, and a heavenly sight in his face. And when they looked on his naked body, they saw it shine with a marvellous brightness for the clearness of his virginity. And then they wrapped the holy body in palls and buried it with great reverence and worship, and largely alms were given for him. And all the lords, spiritual and temporal, were present at the burying of him, thanking God of the great benefits that he showed in this land during the life of the holy saint and king, Saint Edward. Wherefore laud, glory and honour be given to Almighty God, world without end. Amen.

The eighth day after his burying there came a cripple to his tomb to be holpen of his great disease, which many times afore had received alms of the king’s hand, and he had been washen of the king’s hand on Cene-Thursday. Notwithstanding, the miracle of his curing was prolonged by the provision of God, and not showed in his lifetime, because that many miracles God showed for him, in like wise he would show after his death. This cripple was called Ralph, and was a Norman born, and the sinews of his arms were shrunken together, and his feet were drawn up to his buttocks that he might not go, neither on his feet ne on his knees, but sat on a hollow vessel in manner of a basin, drawing his body after him with his hands. And when he came to the tomb, he besought Almighty God and Saint Edward devoutly that he might be cured and healed of his disease, which in his lifetime had most lived by his alms. And when he had continued awhile in his prayers other people that had compassion of him, prayed for him also, and at the last he lifted himself up, and felt his sinews loosed, and then he arose up and stood on his feet, and felt himself made perfectly whole for to do what he should. We have read of the virtues that Saint Edward had in healing blind men in his living, which our Lord hath not withdrawn from him after his death. It happed that thirty days after his burying, there came to his tomb a man which had but one eye, leading after him six blind men, and each of them held other by the skirt. And all they devoutly prayed to God and to Saint Edward that they might have their sight, and to be delivered of the great misery that they stood in, and much people came thither for to see what should befall of this thing. And when they saw how heartily these blind men prayed, then all the people being moved with pity, kneeled down devoutly, and prayed for them to God, and to this holy saint. And anon as they had ended their prayers all they received perfectly their sight. And then each of them that had been blind looked fast on each other, and thought it a new world with them. And each enquired of other, if they might see, and they said yea. And all kneeled down, thanking God full heartily that, by the merits of Saint Edward he had restored to them their sight perfectly, and also to their leader, which had but one eye at his coming, and had sight of the blind eye also, and so all had their perfect sight. And after, they returned home each into his country, giving laud and thankings to God and to this holy king.

After this Harold Harfager, king of Norway, and Tosti, brother of king Harold of England, came with a great navy and a great host, and arrived in Humber, and there made war, intending to conquer this land. Howbeit, the people began to resist them, but they were not of power to overcome them. And when Harold understood this, he raised a great multitude of people to withstand them. Then Saint Edward on a night appeared to a holy monk, which was abbot of Rumsey, and bade him go and tell to Harold that he should overcome his enemies, the which intended to destroy and consume this realm of England, and say to him that he dread not, for I shall so conduct him and his host, that he shall have victory, for I may not see ne suffer this realm of England to be destroyed. And when thou hast told to him this, he will not believe thee, wherefore thou shalt prove thy vision in this manner. Let him think and set his mind on what thing he will, and thou shalt tell him what he thinketh, for God shall show that to thee, and then he shall give credence to thy words. On the morn the abbot of Rumsey, named Alexis, went to king Harold and told to him this vision, and how he should by the aid of Saint Edward overcome his enemies. And when he heard it first, he supposed it had been a fantasy, and when he showed to him his privy thought, then he gave faith thereto and went to the battle, howbeit that he was then sick in his groin of a pestilence botch, and slew Tosti, his brother, and Harold Harfager, and right few or none escaped alive, from the battle. Wherefore the Englishman thanked God and Saint Edward of their victory.

In the monastery of Westminster there was a fair young man which was blind, whom the monks had ordained to ring the bells, and he had a custom daily to visit the tomb of Saint Edward with certain prayers. And on a time as he prayed there, he fell asleep, and he heard a voice that bade him go and ring to the last hour. And when he awoke he saw Saint Edward going tofore him like a king with a crown on his head, and had marvellous light about him. And he beheld him till he came to the high altar, and then he saw him no more, ne the light, but he had his sight ever after till his life’s end, and then he told unto the monks how he was healed, and had his sight again by this miracle.

Of the Deposition of Saint Wulstan, and how he was restored again.

When William Conqueror had gotten all England, and had it under his power, then he began to meddle with the church, and by the advice of Lanfranc, the holy bishop Saint Wulstan, was challenged that he was not able of letters, ne of conning for to occupy the realm and office of a bishop, and was called tofore Lanfranc, and willed him to resign by the consent of the king to the said Lanfranc, archbishop, that a man of greater conning might occupy the dignity. To whom Wulstan said: Forsooth father, I know well that I am not worthy to have this dignity, ne am not sufficient to occupy so great a charge, for I knew well mine unconning at such time when I was elect thereto, but I was compelled by our holy father the pope, and by good king Edward, and sith it pleaseth the council that I shall resign, I shall gladly resign, but not to you, but to him that compelled me to take it. And he departed incontinent from the archbishop Lanfranc, and went straight to the tomb of Saint Edward with his cross in his hand, and he said to Saint Edward, as he had then been alive: O thou holy and blessed king, thou knowest well that I took this charge on me against my will, but by constraint of the pope and thee I obeyed to take it, and it now so is that we have a new king, new laws, and giveth new sentences, in reproving thee of thine error for so much as thou gavest it to me, simple and unconning man, and me, for the presumption that I would consent to take it. That time thou mightest well have been beguiled, for thou wert a frail man, but now thou art joined to God, whereas thou mayst not be deceived. Thou gavest to me the charge, and to thee I here resign it again. And with that he fixed his staff into the hard stone of his tomb, saying: Take this and give it to whom it pleaseth thee. And the hard stone that lay upon his tomb resolved by miracle, and received his cross or pastoral staff, and held it so fast that it might not be taken out by man’s hand. And anon he did off the habit of a bishop, and did on a cowl, and stood among the monks in such degree as he did tofore ere he was bishop. And when word came, and was reported to them that had consented to his resignation, they marvelled greatly and were all abashed, and some of them went to the tomb and would have pulled out the staff, but they could not move it. And when the archbishop Lanfranc heard thereof he commanded to Gundulf, bishop of Rochester, to go and fetch to him the pastoral staff, but when he came he set hand on it and pulled at it, but the stone held it so fast that he might not move it, wherefore he was sore abashed, and came to Lanfranc, and told to him of this miracle. Then the king and Lanfranc were abashed and came both in their persons to see this thing, and there made their prayers. And after, with great reverence Lanfranc assayed and set hand on the staff for to have pulled it out, but it would not move. Then the king and the archbishop were sore afraid, and repented them, and sent for to seek Wulstan, whom they found among the monks and brought him tofore the king and the archbishop, who anon kneeled down and asked forgiveness. And Wulstan meekly kneeled down and prayed them not so to do to him, and humbly and meekly pardoned them and prayed the archbishop humbly to bless him. Then Lanfranc went to this holy man Wulstan and said: Brother, thy rightful simplicity hath been but little set by among us, but our Lord hath made thy righteousness to shine like as a day-star. But, brother, we have trespassed and erred in judging the good to be evil and the evil good, but our Lord God hath araised the spirit of Saint Edward which hath made void all our sentences, and thy simpleness is allowed tofore God. Wherefore come hither to thy king and ours, Saint Edward, and receive again thy staff which he hath denied to us, for we suppose he will deliver it to you. Then Wulstan the servant of God meekly obeyed with great reverence unto the archbishop, and went unto the tomb whereas the staff stood fast fixed in the stone, and kneeling down saying: O blessed saint of God, I here meekly submit me to thy sentence to whom sometime thou gavest and chargedst me unworthy with this staff. If it so please thee that thine old sentence abide, then restore to me again this pastoral staff, and if it please to thee to change it, so show to us whom thou wilt shall take it. And this said he set his hand humbly and with great reverence on the staff, and anon the hard stone resolved, and let the staff to go out, as it had been soft earth or clay. And when they that stood about him saw this great miracle they wept for joy in giving out largely tears, and asked him forgiveness, giving laud and praising unto Almighty God and to this holy saint king Edward. And ever after, king William had great devotion to visit the tomb of his cousin, Saint Edward, and did great cost toward the making of his shrine.

How his holy body was found incorrupt many years after.

After this miracle was showed, there was much talking of his holiness, and the devotion of the people increased daily more and more, so there were many diverse worshipful persons that desired to see this holy body. For some said that it lay incorrupt, and some said nay; and in this meek strife they gat licence of the abbot Gilbert to see it. And when the day was set that this holy body should be showed, there came thither many worshipful men and women of religion, among whom came Gundulf, bishop of Rochester, and this was six-and-thirty years after his burying that they opened his tomb. And when the stone was removed they felt a marvellous sweet savour, that all the church was replete thereof as though an odour aromatic had flowed out of the tomb. And they found the pall that lay next his body as whole and as fair as it was when he was buried; and when the pall was taken off they drew forth his arms, they moved his fingers and his toes, and they were bowing and whole as they had been newly buried. And in his flesh was found no corruption, but it was fair and fresh of colour, pure, and brighter than glass, whiter than snow, and it seemed a body glorified. And they feared to discover his visage, but Gundulf which was hardier than another, with devotion unbound his head, and the first that appeared was the fair hoar hair of his head, and then he thought to take some thereof for a relic, and with reverence and dread plucked thereat, but he could none have out, for they were as fast as they were when he was alive. Then said the abbot: Father, suffer him to lie in rest, and attempt not to minish that our Lord hath so long preserved and kept whole. Then the pall in which the holy body was wrapt was taken away, and another of the same value was fetched, and the holy body laid therein, and covered again his tomb with full great reverence, abiding the great resurrection.

How vengeance was showed to a damoiselle that blasphemed Saint Edward.

In the city of London there was a noble woman which was right conning in silk work, which was desired to embroider certain garments to the countess of Gloucester, which then was young, Iusty, fresh, and newly wedded, and would have them made in short space. And when the festal day of Saint Edward approached, this noble woman was sore troubled in her mind for she dreaded the indignation of the great lady if her garments were not ready at time set, and also she dreaded to work on the day of Saint Edward, for it was both sinful and perilous. Then she said to a young damoiselle that was fellow with her, and wrought in the same work: What think ye best now, either to displease this lady or else this good Saint Edward? And she answered: Is this not that Edward whom the churls of the country worship as he were a god? And she said yet more: What have I to do with him? I will no more worship him than if he were a churl. Then this noble woman was sore abashed and moved with her, that she said such words of blasphemy to this holy saint, and she all to-beat her for to be in peace, and she of frowardness blasphemed him more and more, and then suddenly was smitten with a palsy, so that her mouth was drawn to her ear, and also she had lost her speech, and foamed at the mouth like a boar, and grinded her teeth together marvellously, and was sore punished in all her members. And when this noble woman saw this, she was full heavy that she had beaten her, because Almighty God had so punished her, and wept full bitterly. And when it was known in the city, her neighbours came, some for to comfort her and some to wonder upon her so Iying. And then there came a worshipful man to visit her, and counselled that she should be carried by water unto the shrine of Saint Edward, and to pray to God there, that by the merits of the holy Saint Edward he would show some miracle for her. And when she was so brought thither, much people prayed for her, but they had not their intent anon, but abode in their prayers till midnight that matins began, and then they prayed the monks to pray for her. And when they had done matins they came to the shrine also and prayed for this damoiselle which lay there in full great pain and torment. And when the holy monks had prayed for her a good while, then this damoiselle arose up all whole, and demanded why they wept and made so much sorrow. And when they saw her mouth in his right place and all her members restored again, they were full of joy, and gave laud and thankings unto Almighty God and to his holy king and confessor Saint Edward.

How a monk was healed of a fever quartan.

In the abbey of Westminster there was a virtuous monk and conning named Gilbert, which was sore vexed with a fever quartan from the month of July to Christmas, and consumed like a dry image, whereof he prayed God to release his pain or take him out of this world. And on Christmas night he took heart to him and went to matins with his brethren. And when he heard the gospel, how a little child was born and given to us from the father of heaven, whose mother was a pure virgin, he had so great devotion that his mind was ravished with so great joy that he felt no disease two days after. After those two days the fever came again, and vexed him continually unto the feast of Saint Edward which is always in the vigil of the Epiphany. And that day in the high mass time he came to the tomb of Saint Edward and fell down plat in great devotion, and weeping, and said thus: O thou, my lord and king, how long wilt thou forget me? How long shall I suffer this pain? How long shalt thou turn thy face from me? Where be all the great miracles that our fathers have told to us, done in their days? Thou hast holpen many strangers, but me that am in thine own church thou forgettest and closest to me the gate of thy pity. Would God that I might die, I am nourished in pain and may not die, my life is sorrow to me, but it can have none end, and I desire death and dare not have it. What shall I strive with thee? But I beseech thee, good king, laudable prince, and sweet patron, move thy bowels of mercy on me, if it please thee give me health, or else let me die anon. And among these words the tears brake out of his eyes, and sobbings from his heart, that he could not speak with his mouth but with his affection. And when mass was done, he arose up from prayer all whole, and felt all his members marvellously refreshed with a new strength and entered in and asked after meat and drink, and anon he felt himself that he had received again his strength. And ever after he was moved with great devotion unto the glorious Saint Edward, by whose merits he was delivered from his sickness and disease.

And in like wise a knight named Gerin was healed that same day, a year after, of the fever quartan, which came that day unto the shrine and heard the same monk that had so been healed, which then was prior, make a sermon in which he told of the miracle, how he was whole. And after the sermon this knight thought he would not cease. but devoutly prayed this holy saint till he were whole, and abode there praying all that day and night following till the monks came to matins, whom he prayed to pray for him. And when they had prayed a good while he felt himself made perfectly whole, and then he with all the people gave thankings to our Lord, Almighty God, and Saint Edward, for his deliverance.

Also a nun of Barking, that had been sick twelve months, and nigh consumed away, had a vision on a night by which she understood that she should go to Saint Edward and be whole; and she making her prayers to Saint Edward. And at such time as her sickness came, she entered into her oratory and said the seven Psalms and Litany, and when she did so twice all her pain was gone, and she was made perfectly whole, and thanked Almighty God, which by the merits of Saint Edward had healed her, and soon after came to Westminster in pilgrimage, and there did show this miracle, and told how she was made whole.

Also there was a monk of Westminster which was accustomed to say every day five Psalms in the worship of God and Saint Edward, which monk was grieved with three manner sicknesses. For he had on his arm a congelation of blood in manner of a posthume, he had also in his breast a straitness that unnethe he might draw his breath, also he had in his foot a marvellous swelling and a great, that he might not go but with great pain. And when the yearly feast was hallowed, he saw his brethren go to the church at midnight for to ring the bells, and he was right sorry that he might not do the same. Notwithstanding he pained himself and went thither, and said the seven psalms. And when he had done, and saw his brethren ring merrily, he said in his prayer to

Saint Edward: O thou my good king, I beseech thee to pray for me that I may have strength to do as I see my brethren do, for I commit me fully to thy might, and I believe verily that thou wilt suffer me no longer in this great disease. And when he had made an end of his prayers he arose up, and went to the bells for to ring them, and anon the posthume of his arm brake, and when the foul matter was out, he felt himself whole of that disease. Then his most pain was in his breast, and he went again to pray and to give thankings to God and to Saint Edward of the deliverance of his posthume. And there he prayed full devoutly that he might be delivered of the disease of his breast, and when he arose from prayer he felt his heart all whole from the sickness that he had in his breast. Then he felt no disease but on his foot, and when he came among his brethren in the fraitour, he told them how he was delivered from twain of his sicknesses, and when they saw him they marvelled greatly, and besought Almighty God and Saint Edward that he might be delivered of that disease in his foot. And at night, when he went to his bed, he put himself wholly in the merits of Saint Edward, and when he arose he felt no pain, but put down his hand to his foot to feel how it was, and he felt that the swelling was gone. He leapt out of his bed and told to his brethren, with full great joy, how he was made perfectly whole as ever he was. Then they were all full glad, and went with him to the church to give thankings and praisings to Almighty God, and to his holy confessor Saint Edward for these miracles, and for his deliverance from the three sicknesses, wherefore God be praised in his servant without end. Amen.

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/the-golden-legend-the-life-of-saint-edward-the-confessor/


A Saint Who Was A King – Saint Edward of England

Saint Edward was born almost at the beginning of a new century, in the year 1003. But although he lived so long ago, he is still remembered as one of the best kings that England has ever had, and many of the wise laws he made have remained to the present day. He was called Edward the Peacemaker, and if ever the world needed a true peacemaker, it needs one today. What, then, can this saint and hero teach us?

When Edward was a little boy, England was in a state of war and unrest, and the Danish King, Canute, who ruled the country at that time, sent Edward and his brother Alfred, the rightful heirs to the throne, to Normandy, in France. Edward grew up in Normandy, leading a quiet and peaceful life. He was very fond of sport, particularly hunting and hawking, but at the same time, he liked to spend much of his time at prayer, alone with God. Once during his prayer he made a vow, a very solemn promise, to make a pilgrimage to Saint Peter’s tomb in Rome if it should be God’s Will to restore him to the English throne.

In the year 1042, the people of England sent to Edward to ask him to be their King. He agreed to this, although he knew it would be no easy task to rule a country that had been torn by many wars and unjust laws. He said to one of his friends: “I would not accept the greatest of monarchies if it were to cost the blood of a single man.”

Edward came back to England, and was crowned King on Easter Sunday, 1042. He was now forty, very handsome to look at, and very gentle in manner. Many people thought he would be too easygoing, and after a few years, another Danish king, Magnus, declared he would like to be King of England, and prepared to send Edward away again.

King Edward very firmly replied: “I sit on the throne as the descendant of the English monarchs, and I have been called to it by the free choice of the English people. Let Magnus come! I will raise no army against him, but he will never mount the throne of England until he has taken the life of Edward.”

The people were delighted with such an answer, and England entered upon a period of peace and prosperity such as it had not known for a long time. King Edward was kind and charitable to his people, particularly the poor. He freed them from an unjust tax they had paid to the Danes, and no further taxes were imposed upon them. Someone has written this great praise about him: “Those in trouble were not afraid to ask his help. He always welcomed those who came to see him,” It is not always easy to be able to welcome visitors, but Edward managed to do it.

The King now remembered his vow to go to Rome, but the people were so afraid that if he left the country the peace of the land might be broken again, that they begged him not to go. Edward pointed out that he must keep his vow, but he was moved by the fear of his people and wrote to the Pope to ask him what he should do.

The Pope understood how matters were in England. He freed King Edward from his vow and told him instead to give to the poor anything that he had collected for his journey, and also to build a church dedicated to Saint Peter to make up for the wonderful Saint Peter’s in Rome that he was never to see.

There is one thing about the saints – they always obey.

Edward immediately set about putting aside money for the church he was to build, and finally it was completed. It is known today as Westminster Abbey, and it was here that, later on, the King was to be buried.

In the year 1065, Edward went to London to be present at the beautiful ceremony of the Dedication of the church he had built. But, as so often happens, he was not to witness the crowning glory to his work. On Christmas Eve, he became very ill, yet he practised his usual self-control by appearing as cheerful as ever and carrying on with his ordinary duties. He asked his wife, Queen Edith, to see to the proper decoration of the church for the Consecration ceremony, but despite all his efforts, Edward was too ill to be present himself on the great day. His work for God and his people was almost over, and on January 5th, 1066, he died. His feast is not kept on this day, but on October 13th, the day when Saint Thomas a’Becket removed Saint Edward’s body from its first burial place to the shrine in the Abbey where it still rests.

There are several lessons that we can learn from the life of Saint Edward, but perhaps two stand out above the rest. The first is his great love for peace, a peace that he always had within his own soul, and that he also won for his country. No wars, no arguments, no conferences were used to obtain this peace; his every-day good example and peaceful living among his own people were the weapons of victory.

The second lesson is his faithful fulfilling of God’s Will. King Edward knew that to be a saint he must do God’s Will, and for him this Will of God consisted in trying to do at all times what he knew to be right for his country, his people and himself.

Saint Edward, the Peacemaker, who always tried to do God’s Will, is a wonderful hero and patron for any boy.

– from the pamphlet Hero Stories especially for Boys. (Girls too!), by Eileen Taylor, Australian Catholic Truth Society, #1258, 1957

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/a-saint-who-was-a-king-saint-edward-of-england/


Pictorial Lives of the Saints – Saint Edward the Confessor

Edward was unexpectedly raised to the throne of England at the age of forty years, twenty-seven of which he had passed in exile. On the throne, the virtues of his earlier years, simplicity, gentleness, lowliness, but above all his angelic purity, shone with new brightness. By a rare inspiration of God, though he married to content his nobles and people, he preserved perfect chastity in the wedded state. So little did he set his heart on riches, that thrice when he saw a servant robbing his treasury he let him escape, saying the poor fellow needed the gold more than he. He loved to stand at his palace-gate, speaking kindly to the poor beggars and lepers who crowded about him, and many of whom he healed of their diseases. The long wars had brought the kingdom to a sad state, but Edward’s zeal and sanctity soon wrought a great change. His reign of twenty-four years was one of almost unbroken peace, the country grew prosperous, the ruined churches rose under his hand, the weak lived secure, and for ages afterwards men spoke with affection of the “laws of good Saint Edward.” The holy king had a great devotion to building and enriching churches. Westminster Abbey was his latest and noblest work. He died January 5th, 1066.

Reflection – David longed to build a temple for God’s service. Solomon reckoned it his glory to accomplish the work. But we, who have God made flesh dwelling in our tabernacles, I ought to think no time, no zeal, no treasures too much to devote to the splendor and beauty of a Christian church.

SOURCE : https://catholicsaints.info/pictorial-lives-of-the-saints-saint-edward-the-confessor/

Pietro Francavilla su dis. del Giambologna, Sant'Edoardo il Confessore, 1579, Cappella Salviati in Basilica di San Marco, Firenze

Saint Edward the Confessor by Giambologna and Pietro Francavilla (San Marco church, Florence)

Pietro Francavilla su dis. del Giambologna, Sant'Edoardo il Confessore, 1579, Cappella Salviati in Basilica di San Marco, Firenze

Saint Edward the Confessor by Giambologna and Pietro Francavilla (San Marco church, Florence)


Sant' Edoardo III il Confessore Re d'Inghilterra

5 gennaio

Oxford, Inghilterra, 1004/1005 - Londra, Inghilterra, 5 gennaio 1066

Normanno da parte di madre, nel primo periodo la sua vita, visse in esilio in Francia per sfuggire all'invasione danese. Incoronato re d'Inghilterra nel 1043, si trovò a far da mediatore, con grandi difficoltà ed insuccessi, fra i Normanni e i Sassoni. Per spirito di conciliazione, sposò Edith, la figlia colta e intelligente del suo principale avversario politico. Il matrimonio, nonostante inizialmente fosse stato dettato dalla ragion di Stato, fu caratterizzato da un profondo accordo. Mite e generoso, Edoardo lasciò una traccia indelebile nel popolo inglese che lo venerò non solo per alcuni saggi provvedimenti amministrativi ma, principalmente, per la sua bontà, per la carità verso coloro che avevano bisogno e per la santità della sua vita. A lui si deve la restaurazione del monastero di Westminster.

Patronato: Inghilterra

Etimologia: Edoardo = che si cura della proprietà, dal tedesco

Emblema: Corona, Anello

Martirologio Romano: A Londra in Inghilterra, sant’Edoardo, detto il Confessore: re degli Angli, amatissimo dal suo popolo per la sua grande carità, assicurò la pace al suo regno e promosse con tenacia la comunione con la sede di Roma.

In Inghilterra ci fu un re che lavorò costantemente per mantenere la pace nei suoi Stati e la comunione con la Chiesa cattolica. Sant’Edoardo, chiamato il Confessore, è stato il più popolare dei re inglesi dell’antichità.

Tre qualità gli fecero meritare la sua fama di santo: era molto pio, estremamente gentile e amava molto la pace.

Un autore vissuto all’epoca ci ha lasciato questi dati su di lui:

*    Era un vero uomo di Dio.

*    Viveva come un angelo tra tante occupazioni materiali, e si notava che Dio lo aiutava in tutto.

*    Era così buono che non ha mai umiliato con le sue parole neanche l’ultimo dei suoi servi.

*    Si mostrava particolarmente generoso con i poveri e con gli emigrati, e aiutava molto i monaci.

*    Anche quando era in vacanza o andava a caccia, non si perdeva neanche un giorno la Messa.

*    Era alto, maestoso, dal volto roseo e con i capelli bianchi.

*    La sua sola presenza ispirava affetto e apprezzamento.

La vita

Nacque verso il 1003, figlio del re anglosassone Etelredo “l’Indeciso”. Era figlio del terzo matrimonio di Etelredo con la principessa Emma di Normandia.

Quando nel 1015 il re danese Canuto invase l’Inghilterra, la madre Emma partì subito con Edoardo e suo fratello Alfredo verso la Normandia, dove svilupparono grande familiarità con i normanni e i loro leader.

Poco dopo la morte del marito Emma tornò in Inghilterra, sposando in seguito Canuto, durante il governo danese in Inghilterra.

Dopo la morte di Canuto e dei suoi figli, il diritto anglosassone e la nobiltà ecclesiastica invitarono Edoardo, figlio di Emma, a tornare in Inghilterra. Era il 1041. Nel 1042, a circa 40 anni, divenne re.

Un modello di re

Per evitare che si ravvivasse il risentimento della nobiltà anglosassone, nel 1045 Sant’Edoardo si unì in matrimonio con Edith, la figlia del conte Godwin, scontento per l’elezione di Edoardo al trono e che con il suo atteggiamento costituiva una minaccia per il suo regno.

La tradizione dice che Edoardo e la moglie erano persone così ascetiche e dedite a Dio che decisero di vivere insieme come fratello e sorella, per poter così raggiungere la santità. Sant’Edoardo conservò quindi la sua castità.

Edoardo ebbe dei modi d’agire che lo resero estremamente popolare tra i sudditi e lo trasformarono in un modello per i futuri re.

La prima cosa che fece assumendo il suo incarico fu sopprimere l’imposta di guerra, che rovinava molta gente.

Durante il suo lungo regno cercò di vivere nell’armonia più completa con le Camere legislative (che divise in due: Camera di Lord e Camera dei Comuni).

Si preoccupò sempre di far sì che gran parte delle imposte che venivano raccolte fosse ripartita tra i più bisognosi.

L’esilio e una promessa

Quando Edoardo era in esilio in Normandia, promise a Dio che se fosse riuscito a tornare in Inghilterra si sarebbe recato in pellegrinaggio a Roma per offrire una donazione al papa.

Quando divenne re, raccontò ai suoi collaboratori il giuramento che aveva fatto, ma questi gli dissero: “Il regno è in pace perché tutti vi obbediscono volentieri, ma se compirete un viaggio così lungo scoppierà la guerra civile e il Paese andrà in rovina”.

Sant’Edoardo decise allora di inviare alcuni ambasciatori a consultare papa San Leone IX, che gli mandò a dire che gli permetteva di cambiare la sua promessa con un’altra: dare ai poveri quello che avrebbe speso per il viaggio e costruire un convento per i religiosi.

Il re lo fece subito: ripartì tra i poveri tutto quello che aveva risparmiato per compiere il viaggio, e vendendo varie delle sue proprietà costruì un convento per 70 monaci, la famosa Abbazia di Westminster (nome che significa monastero d’Occidente: West = Ovest o Occidente e Minster = monastero). È nella cattedrale che si trova in questo luogo che vengono sepolti i re d’Inghilterra.

Morte e venerazione

L’inaugurazione solenne del famoso coro del Monastero di Westminster ebbe luogo il 28 dicembre 1065, ma il re era già gravemente malato e non poté assistere alla cerimonia.

Morì nel 1066 e venne seppellito nella chiesa dell’Abbazia, restaurata di recente. Non aveva figli, e la lotta per la successione diede origine all’invasione normanna dell’ottobre 1066 e alla battaglia di Hastings. Presto iniziarono i pellegrinaggi sulla sua tomba.

Nel 1102 il suo corpo venne trovato incorrotto, e il 17 febbraio 1161 papa Alessandro III lo incluse nel catalogo dei santi.

I resti del re santo vennero trasferiti nell’Abbazia di Westminster con una cerimonia solenne officiata dall’arcivescovo San Tommaso Becket nel 1163. La Chiesa lo ricorda con gioia ogni 13 ottobre.

Patrono di re, matrimoni difficili e coniugi separati

La Chiesa cattolica si riferisce a Edoardo il Confessore come al santo patrono dei re, dei matrimoni difficili e dei coniugi separati.

Dopo il regno di Enrico II, Edoardo venne considerato il santo patrono dell’Inghilterra finché nel 1348 San Giorgio, il cui culto come santo per i soldati arrivò in Inghilterra durante le Crociate, lo sostituì in questo ruolo. Edoardo, tuttavia, continua ad essere il santo patrono della famiglia reale inglese.

Autore: Roberta Scimplicotti

Fonte: Aleteia

Chiesa di Sant'Edoardo, Sant’Edoardo (Busto Arsizio) - Interior ; Edward the Confessor in statues


Edoardo III il Confessore, re d’Inghilterra, è il santo più celebre a portare tale nome, insieme con il suo avo, Sant’Edoardo II il Martire. Il futuro Edoardo III nacque nei pressi di Oxford tra il 1004 ed il 1005 da Etelredo II lo Sconsigliato e dalla sua seconda moglie, la principessa normanna Emma. A causa dello stato di agitazione che regnava nel paese, all’età di soli dieci anni fu mandato in esilio in Normandia, ove rimase sino al 1041. Richiamato poi in Inghilterra, l’anno seguente ascese al trono. Proprio durante l’esilio il futuro re aveva appreso molte delle qualità che gli tornarono più utili, come ricorda il suo biografo Barlow: “opportunismo e flessibilità, pazienza, cautela, capacità di evitare lo scontro frontale [...] sapienza terrena [...] disponibilità ad accettare qualunque sorte gli fosse riservata”. Regnò per un periodo abbastanza lungo, riuscendo a tenere sotto controllo i molteplici nemici, sia interni che esterni. Il suo successore Aroldo, ventidue anni dopo, si trovò a governare un paese ben più tranquillo, unito e stabile di quanto non lo fosse stato all’incoronazione di Edoardo.

La santità di Edoardo non è data esclusivamente da alcune azioni eroiche, bensì è frutto del suo comportametno complessivo quale sovrano. Resta tuttavia difficile conoscere con certezza molti aspetti del suo governo, del suo carattere e delle sue motivazioni. Con lo sviluppo del suo culto, la fama del suo regno si accrebbe tanto da giudicarlo quasi un’epoca d’oro e per sua la grande popolarità Sant’Edoardo divenne uno dei principali patroni d’Inghilterra. Le numerose “Vite” scritto in seguito sul suo conto misero in evidenza la santità di questo grande sovrano, i miracoli ottenuti per sua intercessione, la castità custodita integra per tutta la vita, la carità verso i poveri, verso la Chiesa ed in particolare verso i monaci.

Occorre però sottolineare come qualcuno nutrisse non pochi interessi dall’incentivare il culto di Sant’Edoardo: in primis i monaci dell’abbazia di Westminster, che ne conservavano la tomba e fecero proliferare i racconti circa la santità e la potenza taumaturgica del re, al fine di incrementare l’afflusso di pellegrini; in seguito la venerazione nei confronti di Edoardo, normanno per parte materna, risultò di aiuto agli invasori normanni per tentare di ottenere un’indiretta legittimazione al loro potere sull’isola. Parecchi leggendari elementi sulla sua esistenza terrena non sono certi, come la scelta fatta con la moglie Edith di condurre una vita di castità ed il matrimonio bianco, forse pure supposizione volte a giustificare il fatto che non lasciò discendenza. Anche la maggior parte dei racconti sui miracoli è assai dubbia: la “Vita” più anica, scritta pochissimi anni dopo la sua morte, narra di alcune guarigioni avvenute con l’acqua in cui il santo re si era lavato le mani. Fu allora invocato contro le malattie della pelle e l’epilessia e secondo la tradizione fu il primo sovrano inglese a contrarre la cosiddetta “malattia del re”, cioè la scrofola. Abolì la tassa dell’heregeld, destinata al mantenimento dell’esercito, per devolvere il ricavato ai poveri, ma forse si trattò solo di un provvedimento temporaneo.

Analizzando invece le qualità di Edoardo come sovrano, ci si può rifare a notizie più certe: difese il paese dagli attacchi stranieri e protesse la propria autorità dai sudditi troppo ambiziosi. Tentò sempre in ogni modo di evitare le guerre, ma fu sempre risoluto nel dispiegare un esercito o una flotta contro la minaccia di invasione. Per rafforzare la propria posizione non mancò di stringere numerose alleanze straniere. In patria la più seria minaccia al suo potere era costituita dal conte Godwin del Wessex: ne sposò allora la figlia, Edith, ma quando nel 1051 Godwin minacciò una rivolta, ad Edoardo non restò che esiliarlo insieme all’intera sua famiglia, facendo rinchiudere anche Edith in un convento. Già l’anno seguente il re permise a Godwin di fare ritorno in patria, evitando così il rischio di una guerra civile e nel regno continuò dunque a regnare la pace.

Indipendentemente dalla fama acquisita in seguito, pare che non fu un grande benefattore della Chiesa, ad eccezione di Westminster. Una saggia amministrazione delle nomine ecclesiastiche costituiva una parte essenziale per affermare l’autorità regio ed un buon governo. Il giudizio di Edoardo in queste questioni si rivelo sempre oculato, salvo il caso di Stigand, arcivescovo di Canterbury che si rivelò certo un abile amministratore, ma poco animato da spirito religioso. Edoardo nominò anche degli stranieri alle sedi episcopali inglesi, non per distruggere la matrice nazionale della Chiesa, quanto più per il desiderio di scegliere degli uomini di qualità. Durante il suo regno furono applicate importanti riforme locali, non vi furono scandali e vennero rafforzati i rapporti con Roma.

La decisione di rifondare l’abbazia di Westminster, monumento che perpetuò indefinitamente il suo ricordo, nacque da un voto che Edoardo aveva fatto quando in gioventù era esule in Normandia: se Dio avesse reintegrato nei suoi diritti la sua famiglia, si sarebbe recato a Roma in pellegrinaggio. Asceso poi al trono, si trovò impossibilitato a lasciare l’Inghilterra e chiese perciò al papa di essere dispensato dal voto. Il pontefice acconsentì, commutando l’obbligo nella fondazione di un monastero dedicato all’apostolo Pietro. Edoardo scelse allora un convento già esistente presso Thorney, ad ovest di Londra, al quale fece ingenti donazioni di terreni e in denaro, dando inizio all’edificazione di una magnifica chiesa romanica, che fu l’embrione dell’odierna abbazia di Westminster.

Le sue condizioni di salute, purtroppo, si aggravarono prima di poter partecipare all’innaugurazione del coro della basilica. Morì dopo pochi giorni, il 5 gennaio 1066, e venne sepolto proprio nell’abbazia. Nel 1102 il suo corpo, riesumato e trovato incorrotto, venne traslato in un nuovo sito. In seguito fu soggetto ad alcune traslazioni e le sacre reliquie sopravvissero alla Riforma ed ancora oggi sono oggetto di venerazione. Nel 1161 papa Alessandro III canonizzo Sant’Edoardo III, detto “il Confessore” per distinguerlo dal suo predecessore Edoardo II “il Martire”, dietro interessamento del re Enrico II. Nel 1689 la sua festa fu estesa alla Chiesa universale e fissata in data 13 ottobre, anniversario della prima traslazione. Oggi però il nuovo Martyrologium Romanum ha spostato la commemorazione alla data della morte.

Autore: Fabio Arduino

SOURCE : http://www.santiebeati.it/dettaglio/74150

Saint Édouard le Confesseur. Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Romain (vitrail) - Savennières (France)


Den hellige kong Edvard Bekjenneren (~1004-1066)

Minnedag:

13. oktober

Den hellige Edvard (eng: Edward) med tilnavnet «bekjenneren» (eng: Confessor) ble født rundt 1004 i Islip ved Oxford i England. Han var eldste sønn av den engelske kong Ethelred II den Rådville (978-1016) med hans andre, normanniske hustru Emma, datter av hertug Richard I og søster av hertug Richard II av Normandie. Ethelred var kommet på tronen etter at hans halvbror, den hellige Edvard martyren, ble myrdet i 978.

Ethelred hadde giftet seg første gang rundt 985 med Elgiva (Ælfgifu), datter av jarl Thored av Northumbria, og deres seks sønner var: 1) Ethelstan Atheling (d. 1014) 2) Egbert Atheling (d. ca 1005) 3) Edmund Ironside (ca 989-1016) 4) Edred Atheling (d. ca 1012) 5) Edwy Atheling (d. 1017) (henrettet av Knut) 6) Edgar Atheling (d. ca 1008). I tillegg hadde de minst fire døtre: 1) Edith (Eadgyth) 2) Elgiva (Ælfgifu) 3) Wulfhilda 4) en abbedisse av Wherwell Abbey.

Etter sin første hustrus død giftet Ethelred seg i 1002 med Emma av Normandie, søster av hertug Richard II av Normandie og grandtante til den senere kongen Vilhelm Erobreren. Deres barn var: 1) Edvard bekjenneren (ca 1004-66) 2) Alfred Atheling (d. 1036/37) 3) Goda av England. Alle Ethelreds sønner var oppkalt etter hans forgjengere på tronen. Den hellige Margareta av Skottland var datter av den engelske prins Edvard d’Outremer («landsforvist») Atheling («adelsmannen»), sønn av kong Edvards halvbror kong Edmund Ironside (apr-nov 1016).

Edvard hadde altså seks eldre halvbrødre, farens sønner med sin første hustru Elgiva, så sjansen for at han skulle arve den engelske tronen må ha vært ansett som små i hans barndom. Det ble enda mindre sannsynlig på grunn av den danske erobringen av England. I 1002 beordret Ethelred en massakre av danskene som levde i England den 13. november. Derfor startet den danske kongen Svein Tjugeskjegg (ca 986-1014) flere felttog for å erobre England. Han lyktes i desember 1013, men etter sin seier levde han bare i fem uker før han døde den 3. februar 1014. Da England ble tatt av Svein, flyktet Ethelred til Normandie sammen med hustruen Emma og den tiårige Edvard og hans yngre bror Alfred, og de søkte beskyttelse hos hertug Robert. Ethelred vendte tilbake til England i februar 1014, etter Sveins død.

Etter at kong Svein Tjugeskjegg døde i 1014, utropte hæren hans Sveins sønn Knut den mektige til konge av England, mens høvdingene i hjemlandet Danmark utropte den eldre broren Harald Sveinsson til konge av Danmark. Sannsynligvis hadde det vært kong Sveins intensjon at brødrene skulle arve hvert sitt rike. Da broren Harald døde fire år senere arvet Knut også Danmark. Ethelred klarte å beholde sin trone til han døde den 23. april 1016 i London, og han ble etterfulgt av sin sønn Edmund II Ironside (apr-nov 1016). Edmund ble valgt til konge av befolkningen i London, men hans rival Knut den mektige hadde større støtte enn ham i resten av landet.

Edmund ble slått av danskene, men fikk lov av Knut til å beholde Wessex på den betingelse at den av dem som overlevde den andre, skulle regjere over hele England. Kort tid etter at denne avtalen ble inngått, døde Edmund den 30. november 1016, og det antas at han ble myrdet. Ifølge tradisjonen ble han drept ved at en rødglødende ildraker ble stukket opp i endetarmen på ham mens han satt på toalettet. I henhold til deres avtale overtok Knut da hele riket. Hans tilnavn «den mektige» kom av at han ble konge over tre riker, England (1016-35), Danmark (1018-35) og Norge (1028-35). I 1017 giftet han seg strategisk med kong Ethelreds enke, Emma av Normandie, mens Knuts søster Estrid giftet seg med hertugens bror Richard. Emma ga sin nye ektemann en sønn, Hardeknut, og en datter, Gunhild (ca 1019-38), fra 1036 til sin død gift med den tyske kong Henrik III (den Svarte) (1039-56; keiser fra 1046) som dronning Kunigunde av Tyskland. I 1017 ble Edvards siste gjenlevende halvbror Edwy henrettet av Knut, noe som gjorde den unge prins Edvard til den ledende tronpretendenten. Dette gjorde det imidlertid mest tilrådelig for ham å bli værende ved onkelens hoff i Normandie.

Edvard hadde fått sin første utdannelse i Ely, og han fullførte utdannelsen ved hoffet til morens bror, hertug Richard den Gode. Edvard bodde siden i Normandie, selv etter at moren i 1017 dro tilbake til England for å gifte seg med Knut den Mektige. Etter kong Knuts død i 1035, var den engelske suksesjonen omstridt mellom den avdøde kongens to sønner med hans to hustruer, Harald Harefot, sønn av frillen Alfiva (Aelfgitha) av Northampton, og Hardeknut (Hardicanute), sønn av Emma. Edvard forsøkte å overta tronen selv og ledet et mislykket angrep mot Southampton, men han vendte tilbake til Normandie. Edvards yngre bror Alfred seilte fra Wissant eller Boulogne og kom til England i 1036. Alfred ble tatt av jarl Godwin av Wessex og overlevert til Harald Harefot, som fikk ham blindet for å ødelegge hans kongeverdighet, og han døde av den brutale behandlingen. En kortvarig kult for «martyren» blusset opp i Ely Abbey hvor han ble gravlagt.

Fra Bayeux-teppet og Edvards første biografi er det en kontinuerlig tradisjon om hans utseende: Han var en høy mann med langt ansikt, askeblondt hår og skjegg, rødlig ansiktsfarge og lange, tynne fingre. Edvards biografi tegner et overbevisende portrett av ham som gammel, men den har til gjengjeld formørket vitnesbyrdene om hans modne år. Hans regjeringstid var ytre sett fredelig, og han var en fredselskende mann, men han sto overfor alvorlige vanskeligheter.

Edvard hadde trengt støtte fra den ambisiøse og mektige jarl Godwin av Wessex for å sikre seg tronen, og hans strenge kontroll over England skyldtes hovedsakelig Godwins mektige familie. Flere av hans sønner ble jarler og Edvard giftet seg med hans datter Edith i 1045. Uansett hvor fordelaktig denne alliansen kan ha vært på den tiden, er det sannsynlig at Edvard faktisk næret et dyptfølt nag mot Godwin, som hadde vært innblandet i mordet på hans bror Alfred, og jarlens saksiske lojalitet kom da også senere i konflikt med Edvards egne normanniske preferanser.

Edward brakte med seg mange venner fra Normandie til England, blant dem baronen Robert av Jumièges, som han ga bispedømmet London. I 1050 foretrakk kongen Jumièges fremfor et annet medlem av Godwins klan som erkebiskop av Canterbury (1051-52), og deretter tillot han sine tilhengere å bygge borger i jarledømmene til Godwins sønner Svein og Harald (i henholdsvis Herefordshire og Essex). Året etter kom Edwards svoger Eustace av Boulogne til England og satte i gang med å organisere byggingen av enda en borg i Dover, en del av jarl Godwins eget område. Folket i Dover motsatte seg dette med vold og drepte nitten av Eustaces menn. Godwin nektet å reagere mot mennene fra Kent, og kongen fikk dermed den unnskyldningen han trengte for å sende Godwin i eksil. I 1051 forviste kongen Godwin og hans familie, og til og med dronningen, Godwins datter, måtte tilbringe en tid i et kloster. Edvard forviste også i 1065 en av Godwins sønner, Tostig, etter et opprør i hans jarledømme Northumbria. I 1051 besøkte også hertug Vilhelm av Normandie det engelske hoffet, og det kan neppe betviles at Edvard da tilbød sin fetter på morssiden å bli sin etterfølger på tronen.

Godwin hadde vært overbevist om at Edvard skulle bli så opptatt av sine bønner at han i praksis ville overlate styret av landet til ham. Kongens svigerfar Godwin vendte i 1052 tilbake fra Flandern med en flåte, og da møtte kongen ham personlig og sluttet akseptable betingelser med ham for å unngå opprør og borgerkrig. Godwin ble rehabilitert, og kongens råd «lyste alle franskmenn fredløse». Den normanniske erkebiskopen Robert av Canterbury og en annen biskop flyktet utenlands, og Stigand ble ny erkebiskop (1052-70).

Troen på at Edvard var en helgen startet mens han ennå levde, og den ble støttet av hans generelle ry for fromhet og religiøs hengivenhet, og for sjenerøsitet overfor de fattige og svake. Det ble også fortalt om flere mirakler, og han var den første hersker som ble rapportert å ha helbredet skrofulose eller kjertelsyke ved berøring, «touch for the King’s Evil». Det ble også påstått at han og hans hustru var så asketiske at de alltid hadde levd sammen som bror og søster. Edvard og Edith var ganske visst barnløse, men tatt i betraktning omstendighetene rundt deres bryllup er det usannsynlig at dette skyldtes livsvarig frivillig avholdenhet, og påstanden støttes ikke av noe håndgripelig bevis.

Edvard styrket de nære forbindelsene mellom den gamle engelske kirken og Roma, og han sendte biskoper til den hellige pave Leo IXs (1049-54) konsiler i 1049-50 og mottok pavelige legater i 1061. Han forfremmet sekularprester, noen ganger utenlandske, til bispeseter, og reduserte dermed de monastiske biskopenes tilnærmede monopol. Dette innebærer imidlertid ingen mangel på aktelse for klostervesenet. Mot slutten av sin regjeringstid var kong Edvard mest opptatt av jakt og byggearbeider. Det prosjektet som han huskes best for, er nygrunnleggelsen av Westminster Abbey.

Da Edvar bodde i Normandie, hadde han avlagt løfte om at han skulle dra på valfart til apostelen Peters grav i Roma om han fikk komme tilbake til England. Da han var kronet, holdt han et konsil hvor han kunngjorde sin forpliktelse. Forsamlingen roste hans hengivenhet, men spenningen mellom de angelsaksiske og normanniske partiene var så sterk at de fryktet at landet i kongens fravær ville ligge åpent for indre splittelse og utenlandske fiender. Kongen ble overbevist av deres argumentasjon, og han ba pave Leo IX om dispensasjon fra løftet. Det ble innvilget, under forutsetning av at kongen i stedet ga til de fattige den summen han ville ha brukt på reisen, samt bygde eller restaurerte et kloster for St. Peter.

Edvard valgte et eksisterende lite kloster like ved London, på et sted som het Thorney. Han ble dermed den faktiske grunnlegger av dette Petersklosteret, som han utstyrte med fyrstelig gavmildhet, og fikk fra pave Nikolas II store privilegier og eksempsjoner. En tid skal han ha brukt en tiendedel av sine inntekter på klosteret, og ga det mange eiendommer i mange land. Han bygde en enorm romansk kirke, 300 fot lang, med et skip på tolv fag. På grunn av beliggenheten ble den etter hvert kalt West Minster («den vestlige katedralen») for å skille den fra St. Pauls-kirken øst i byen. Denne kirken, Westminster Abbey, har gitt London ikke bare stedet for kroningen av konger og dronninger, men også Westminster Hall og Parlamentet som et sentrum for kongenes regjering og lov. Kirkens kor ble fullført like før Edvards død og konsekrert den 28. desember 1065, da han var for syk til å delta.

I mellomtiden hadde jarl Godwins andre sønn Harald etterfulgt sin far som kongens fremste rådgiver. I 1054 reiste hans allierte, biskop Aeldred av Worcester, til Sentral-Europa på jakt etter kongens nevø, Edvard Atheling. Han kom til England tre år senere, men døde nesten umiddelbart, åpenbart myrdet. Hans femårige sønn Edgar ble deretter oppdratt ved hoffet. Jarl Harald ble svært populær i landet gjennom sine suksessfulle militærkampanjer, særlig mot waliserne (1055-63) og opprørere i Northumbria (1065).

I slutten av 1065 falt kong Edvard bekjenneren i koma uten å ha klargjort sin preferanse for etterfølgelsen. Selv om Edvard kan ha sverget å støtte den normanniske hertug Vilhelms krav på tronen, skiftet han mening på dødsleiet. For like før sin død fikk han bevisstheten tilbake og overlot sin enke og kongeriket til jarl Haralds «beskyttelse». Deretter døde Edvard, den 5. januar 1066 ifølge Vita Ædwardi Regis. Han ble gravlagt i Westminster Abbey, som var blitt konsekrert bare ti dager tidligere.

Kong Harald forventet en invasjon og samlet sine tropper på Isle of Wight, men siden normannerne ikke kom og det begynte å bli slutt på proviant, oppløste han hæren og dro til London den 8. september. Men samme dag sluttet kong Harald III Hardråde av Norge (1046-66), som også gjorde krav på den engelske tronen, seg til Tostig Godvinsson og invaderte England med sin flåte ved munningen av Tyne. Invasjonstroppene til Hardråde og Tostig bekjempet de engelske jarlene Edwin av Mercia og Morcar av Northumbria i slaget ved Fulford nær York den 20. september. Men Harald ledet sin hær nordover i ilmarsj på fire dager, og han slo Hardråde og Tostig i slaget ved Stamford Bridge ved elven Derwent den 25. september. I det blodige slaget ble både Harald Hardråde og Tostig drept sammen med de fleste nordmennene.

Men selv om Harald Godvinsson slo tilbake de norske angriperne, var hans seier kortvarig, for han ble beseiret og drept av normannerne i slaget ved Hastings mindre enn tre uker senere, den 14. oktober 1066, og normannerne erobret England. Hertug Vilhelm ble dermed kong Vilhelm Erobreren av England. Riktignok ble den fjortenårige Edgar Atheling proklamert som konge etter slaget ved Hastings i 1066, men han styrte aldri og ble avsatt etter rundt åtte uker.

I 1065-67 skrev en anonym forfatter, trolig en munk fra Saint-Omer, en beretning om Edvards liv, Vita Ædwardi Regis, for hans enke, dronning Edith. Det synes som den hadde som formål å fremme hennes families krav på å sørge for en etterfølger til den barnløse kongen. Selv om denne biografien skulle bli basis for den hagiografiske legenden, er den i sin tidligste form nesten fullstendig fri for hagiografi og har en viss historisk verdi. Men dessverre var forfatterentrolig både uvitende om og uinteressert i sitt objekts «viking»-bakgrunn.

Under kong Stefan (1135-54) ble det i 1138 gjort et forsøk på å oppnå en formell pavelig helligkåring av Edvard, støttet av den nye biografien av Osbert av Clare, prior i Westminster. Pave Innocent II (1130-43) utsatte en avgjørelse, men oppfordret munkene i Westminster til å samle mer informasjon. Kong Henrik II av England (1154-89) var i slekt med Edvard gjennom sin oldemor, Margareta av Skottland. Henrik var sønn av keiserinne Matilda (1141), som var datter av kong Henrik I (1100-35) og Margaretas datter Edith, som ble dronning Matilda av England, kjent som Good Queen Maud.

I 1160 la kong Henrik II nytt press på Roma for helligkåring av sin fjerne slektning. Ved å støtte pave Alexander III (1159-81) mot motpave Viktor IV (1159-64), oppnådde han også at Edvard ble helligkåret i 1161. Den 13. oktober 1163 ble helgenens legeme, som fortsatt var like friskt, høytidelig skrinlagt og flyttet til en ny grav av den hellige erkebiskop Thomas Becket. Dette var en nasjonal begivenhet med kong Henrik til stede sammen med mange erkebiskoper og prelater, og prekenen ble holdt av den hellige Ailred av Rievaulx, som skrev en ny biografi om Edvard.

Edvards legeme hviler fortsatt i restene av hans skrin i Westminster Abbey. Skrinet ble plyndret ved reformasjonen, men relikviene fikk ligge i fred, for kong Henrik VIII (1509-47) var varsom med åpenlyse angrep på kongelige personer. Ved siden av det beskjedne skrinet til den ukjente hellige Wite (Whyte eller Candida) i landsbyen Whitchurch Canonicorum i Dorset er Edvard Bekjennerens skrin det eneste i hele England som er bevart intakt og med relikvier som overlevde reformasjonen.

Under dronning Maria Tudor den Katolske ble Westminster gjenskapt som kloster, og abbed Feckenham restaurerte også Edvards gravmæle. Den forgylte treskrinet som vanligvis tilskrives ham, kommer trolig fra Henrik VIIs tid og kan være et arbeid av Torrigiano. I 1685 ble Edvards kiste åpnet, og det ble da oppdaget at hans levninger da var redusert til et skjelett.

Edvard kalles bekjenneren (eng: Edward the Confessor; lat: Eduardus Confessor), det vil si en som bringer vitnesbyrd om Kristus ved sitt liv og ikke sin død, for å skjelne ham (Sanctus Eduardus Confessor rex Anglorum) fra kong Edvard Martyren, hans onkel (Sanctus Eduardus Martyr rex Anglorum). I middelalderen var Edvard en svært populær helgen, og sammen med den hellige Edmund av East Anglia ble han allment ansett for å være Englands skytshelgen, inntil han ble trengt til side av ridderen Georgs popularitet. Ved beleiringen av Calais i 1351 påkalte engelske tropper, ifølge William Worcestre (ca 1415-85), Edvard, selv om han ikke selv var noen soldat, og Georg sammen før de gjorde sitt siste angrep.

Den mest berømte avbildningen av Edvard er i Wilton-diptyket fra rundt 1395, som nå er i National Gallery i London. Der er Edvard Bekjenneren, Edmund og Johannes Døperen avbildet på venstre panel sammen med den unge kong Richard II av England (1377-99), som kneler foran Jomfruen og barnet på høyre panel. Men høyalteret i kapellet i Windsor Castle ble gjeninnviet til Georg rundt 1400. Ved slaget ved Agincourt i 1415, som det blir beskrevet av Shakespeare, ser Georg ut til å regnes som Englands viktigste forbeder, men uten å utelukke Edvard. Innen rundt 1450 ble Georg regnet som skytshelgen for England på samme måte som den hellige Dionysius (Denis) var det for Frankrike.

Edvard Bekjennerens emblem er en fingerring, som kommer fra hans legende.

Legenden forteller at kongen ga en ring til en tigger ved Westminster. To år senere møtte noen engelske pilegrimer i Det hellige Land (eller India) en gammel mann som sa at han var apostelen Johannes. Han ga dem ringen og ba dem returnere den til Edvard, som de skulle advare om hans forestående død om et halvt års tid. Edvard avbildes også ofte mens han bærer en mann, som henspeiler på historien om han at en gang helbredet en giktsyk mann ved å bære ham.

Nummereringen av engelske monarker starter på nytt etter den normanniske erobringen, noe som forklarer hvorfor nummereringen av engelske konger med navnet Edvard begynner med den senere kong Edvard I av England (1272-1307) og ikke inkluderer Edvard Bekjenneren (som var den tredje kong Edvard).

Kilder: Attwater (dk), Attwater/John, Attwater/Cumming, Farmer, Jones, Bentley, Butler, Butler (X), Benedictines, Delaney, Bunson, Cruz (1), Engelhart, Schauber/Schindler, Melchers, Gorys, ODNB, KIR, CE, CSO, Patron Saints SQPN, Infocatho, Bautz, Heiligenlexikon, santiebeati.it, en.wikipedia.org, britannia.com, earlybritishkingdoms.org, zeno.org - Kompilasjon og oversettelse: p. Per Einar Odden Opprettet: 1. februar 2000

Linken er kopiert til utklippstavlen!

SOURCE : https://www.katolsk.no/biografier/historisk/edward


Edward the Confessor, A portrait from the Welsh Portrait Collection at the National Library of Wales. Anglo-Saxon King of England from 1042 to 1066, National Library of WalesAberystwyth


Eduard der Bekenner

englischer Name: Edward Confessor

Gedenktag katholisch: 5. Januar

nicht gebotener Gedenktag in England: 13. Oktober (Übertragung der Gebeine)

Gedenktag III. Klasse: 13. Oktober (Übertragung der Gebeine), Todestag: 5. Januar

Gedenktag anglikanisch: 13. Oktober

Name bedeutet: Hüter des Besitzes (althochdt.)

König von England

* um 1003 in Islip bei Oxford in England

† 5. Januar 1066 in Westminster, heute Stadtteil von London in England

Eduard war der älteste Sohn von König Æthelred II. und dessen zweiter Frau Emma, die eine Schwester des Herzogs Richard II. von der Normandie war. Nach dem Tod seines Vaters 1016 flohen Eduard und sein Bruder vor den Dänen, die England besetzt hatten, zunächst nach Flandern und dann in die Normandie. Als seine Mutter 1017 durch ihre Heirat mit Dänenkönig Knut dem Großen ihre Machtstellung zurückgewann, blieb er im Exil. Ein Versuch, mit Unterstützung der Normannen 1036 den englischen Thron zurückzuerlangen, endete bei Southampton mit einer Niederlage. 1041 konnte er nach der Verdrängung der Dänen aber zurückkehren und 1042 den Königsthron besteigen; 1043 wurde er von Eadsigus von Canterbury und dem Erzbischof von York gekrönt. Er war der letzte in der Reihe der westsächsischen Könige. Er war ein schwacher, von normannischen Günstlingen beeinflusster Regent, ohne große eigene Besitztümer, auch abhängig von den lokalen Fürsten, das Kommando über die Land- und Seestreitkräfte überließ er dem Adel.

Eduard förderte kirchliche Einrichtungen, berief Bischöfe aus Lothringen und der Normandie und stärkte damit die Bindung der englischen Kirche an den Kontinent. Er ließ die Benediktinerabtei St. Peter in Westminster - die heutige Westminster Abbey in London - neu als Steinhaus bauen und beschenkte sie reich.

Eduard lebte sehr bescheiden, um Arme unterstützen zu können; mit seiner 1045 geheirateten Frau Editha, der Tochter des Fürsten von Wessex, habe er keusch gelebt; das Ehepaar blieb kinderlos, die Nachfolge wurde erst mit der Unterwerfung Englands durch Wilhelm den Eroberer entschieden. Eduards tiefe Religiosität und seine vorbildliche Wohltätigkeit hatte großen Einfluss auf die Verbreitung des Christentums in England. Die Legende erzählt, wie er einen Gichtkranken heilte.

Eduard wurde bald schon als Heiliger und Wundertäter verehrt; die Verehrung wurde v. a. durch Ælred von Rievaulx gefördert und diente auch der Legitimierung des englischen Königtums. Sein Grab in der Westminster Abbey in London wurde zum Nationalheiligtum.

Kanonisation: Edward wurde am 7. Februar 1161 durch Papst Alexander II. heiliggesprochen.

Attribute: einen Kranken tragend

Patron von England, der englischen Könige, gegen Skrofeln (angeschwollene Lymphknoten am Hals)

Catholic Encyclopedia

Acta Sanctorum

 Schriften von Eduard gibt es online zu lesen in den Documenta Catholica Omnia.

 Seite zum Ausdruck optimiertUnser Reise-Blog:
 
Reisen zu den Orten, an denen die
Heiligen lebten und verehrt werden.


 Empfehlung an Freunde senden

 Artikel kommentieren / Fehler melden

 Fragen? - unsere FAQs antworten!

 Im Heiligenlexikon suchen

 Impressum - Datenschutzerklärung

Schauen Sie sich zufällige Biografien an:

Johannes Calabria
Jakob Strepa
Ämilianus von Valence

Autor: Joachim Schäfer - zuletzt aktualisiert am 08.12.2023

Quellen:

• Vera Schauber, Hanns Michael Schindler: Heilige und Patrone im Jahreslauf. Pattloch, München 2001

• P. Ezechiel Britschgi: Name verpflichtet. Christiana, Stein am Rhein, 1985

• http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/Newsletters/nl08/

• http://www.battle1066.com/confess.shtml

• Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, begr. von Michael Buchberger. Hrsg. von Walter Kasper, 3., völlig neu bearb. Aufl., Bd. 3. Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau 1995

• Charlotte Bretscher-Gisinger, Thomas Meier (Hg.): Lexikon des Mittelalters. CD-ROM-Ausgabe J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart / Weimar 2000

korrekt zitieren: Joachim Schäfer: Artikel Eduard „der Bekenner”, aus dem Ökumenischen Heiligenlexikon - https://www.heiligenlexikon.de/BiographienE/Eduard_der_Bekenner.htm, abgerufen am 3. 12. 2025

Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet das Ökumenische Heiligenlexikon in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über https://d-nb.info/1175439177 und https://d-nb.info/969828497 abrufbar.

SOURCE : https://www.heiligenlexikon.de/BiographienE/Eduard_der_Bekenner.htm


Edward de Belijder, Londen, Engeland; koning; † 1066.

Feest 5 januari & 13 oktober (overbrenging relieken naar Westminster-Abbey: 1163).

Hij werd geboren in 1003 en was de zoon van Emma, dochter van graaf Richard van Normandië en van koning Ethelred II, die de bijnaam kreeg van 'de onberadene' omdat hij alle Noormannen in zijn rijk liet vermoorden. Daarop kwamen achtereenvolgens de Deense koningen Sven en Knut wraak nemen en maakten zich meester van de Engelse troon. Met als gevolg dat de jonge Edward naar Normandië moest vluchten. Desondanks werd hij toch in 1042 uitgeroepen tot koning over Engeland.

Zijn regeringsperiode wordt zeer verschillend beoordeeld. Volgens sommigen zou hij door zijn zwakte een eind hebben gemaakt aan het aloude Engelse koningshuis. Anderen wijzen erop dat hij zijn vijanden, Schotland en Wales, versloeg, ernst maakte met de vrede binnen zijn land en wijze wetten uitvaardigde. Bovendien hield hij er een heilige levenswijze op na. Gewone mensen hadden gemakkelijk toegang tot hem, hij gaf zijn zorg en aalmoezen aan de armen; in zijn persoonlijk leven leidde hij met Godwina, de dochter van de graaf van Wessex, een huwelijksleven als broer en zus. Hij startte de bouw van wat eens de beroemde Westminster Abbey zou worden.

Afgebeeld

In de kunst wordt hij afgebeeld als gekroonde koning met een ring in de hand. Dit attribuut heeft te maken met de volgende legende.

Legende

Edward zou die ring aan een bedelaar hebben gegeven in de buurt van zijn geliefde Westminster Abbey. Twee jaar later ontmoetten enkele Engelse pelgrims in het Heilige Land (volgens sommigen betreft het India) een oude grijsaard die zich uitgaf voor Johannes de Evangelist. Hij gaf hun de ring en droeg hun op ze aan koning Edward te brengen met de mededeling, dat hij binnen een half jaar zou sterven. Dat gebeurde.

Hij is de koning Edward over wie verteld wordt op de beroemde Tel de Conquest, het tapisserie dat bewaard wordt in de Normandische stad Bayeux.

Patronaten

Edward is patroon van de Engelse koningen en één van de patroons van Engeland.

Bronnen

[011; Dries van den Akker s.j./2010.02.21]

© A. van den Akker s.j. / A.W. Gerritsen

SOURCE : https://heiligen-3s.nl/heiligen/01/05/01-05-1066-edward.php




 Jean-Guy Gouttebroze, « Deux modèles de sainteté royale. Edouard le Confesseur et saint Louis », Cahiers de Civilisation Médiévale  Année 1999  42-167  pp. 243-258 : https://www.persee.fr/doc/ccmed_0007-9731_1999_num_42_167_2758

 Franco Morenzoni, « La Vie d'Edouard le Confesseur d’Alexandre d’Ashby », Civilisation Médiévale  Année 2003  14  pp. 241-252. Fait partie d’un numéro thématique : Culture politique des Plantagenêt (1154-1224). [Actes du Colloque tenu à Poitiers du 2 au 5 mai 2002] : https://www.persee.fr/doc/civme_1281-704x_2003_act_14_1_1117

Maïté Billoré, “Les lettres dans les Vies d’Édouard le Confesseur”Cahiers de civilisation médiévale [Online], 241 | 2018, Online since 01 January 2021, connection on 04 December 2025. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ccm/1799; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ccm.1799 : https://journals.openedition.org/ccm/1799?lang=en